After the pandemic, it is hoped that private hospitals will be abolished. Hospitals are a special profession and cannot just consider economic interests. If most hospitals are gradually converted into private hospitals to adapt to the market economy, the consequences are unimaginable. Nowadays, there are many people in the lower middle class who cannot afford to see a doctor, and with the development of the times, people's normal demands for free medical care, health education, health care knowledge, medical protection, human rights protection, etc. will be increasingly high. If all of them are privatized, it will affect the reform of health care and even more so people's aspirations for a better future. In particular, the emergence of this new crown plague further demonstrates that only the public system can resist the spread of the epidemic.
In this epidemic prevention and control battle, public hospitals are the absolute main force, did not see the shadow of private hospitals. Many public hospitals, especially the grass-roots health centers, even the wages are not paid in full, but they still have no choice but to top, private hospitals in what, in the back door to receive masks. It's time to wake up, outlaw the private sector, protect the financial inputs of public hospitals, protect the financial salaries of grassroots medical and health personnel who undertake public **** health, the root cause of the problem is urgent.
The marketization of hospitals should be abolished. The reason is very simple, the so-called market is to buy and sell fair, open, voluntary, transparent. I'm not going to be able to do that, but I'm going to be able to do it," he said. However, in the medical treatment, the patient absolutely can not do the Lord, the patient does not know what he suffers from what disease, how to cure, to use what medicine, this is not the principle of reciprocity of the market, their own disease, they can not do the Lord, only the doctor to do the Lord, the patient only shell out the money of the share, not the Lord's share. So the hospital marketization is not reciprocal, not transparent, not fair. Patients can only choose to trade, which are the same.
Should medical treatment be marketized? This proposition is not a non-black and white issue, when the objective and rational face.
Medical care is related to basic livelihood protection of special industries, more public welfare qualities destined to maintain its public business mode, in order to give full play to the role of a reliable livelihood protection. In the special period, encourage private capital to participate in the medical industry to supplement the shortage of social resources is not excessive, but should be soberly recognized that the public hospital is the guarantee of medical public welfare this main line.
The private capital operation of the medical profit-seeking is its main purpose, as the seller of the purchased services market, under the premise of safeguarding their own interests, only to think about whether to implement the social obligations of the issue of public service lack of reliability.
An epidemic so that society as a whole recognizes the need for the existence of public hospitals, but it does not mean that private capital must be completely out of the medical market, the key is how to regulate the guide, the establishment of a strict grid of the access mechanism, cut down the small size, not standardized to deceive patients, transitional medical, in order to extract the health insurance fund as the main means of operation of the small black medical institutions is imperative, or to stop the use of its health insurance fund. The first thing you need to do is to get rid of all the bad news and the bad news.
The health insurance fund is one of the most basic livelihood protection, the deep-rooted harm does not lie in an epidemic out of the problem, 19 years of national arbitrage events, proved a long time a large number of health insurance fund is bad small black operators regularly arbitrage, seriously jeopardize the livelihood protection business operations and safety, and how to talk about public welfare undertakings.
Isn't it true that while adhering to the main line of public hospitals, private capital is encouraged to intervene in the medical treatment, to intensive, large-scale, specialized, cutting-edge and standardized direction, that is, to supplement the short board of insufficient social resources, but also to meet the personalized diagnosis and treatment needs of part of the population as well?
From this epidemic can be seen in the necessity and inevitability of public hospitals, with the same special industry, hospitals into the private system, although from a certain point of view can reflect the value of the individual, but more just hospitals use their own characteristics of the resources to infinitely improve their profit margins, and more so that the country's health care funds unlawful and unlimited outflow of funds to a large extent so that the people have lost confidence in a more Heavy medical burden. In recent years, the national health care reform, whether from the reform of drug prices or economic subsidies to doctors, are all built on the basis of national policy for the country for the people, the healthy development of China's medical career. Since the hospital restructuring, although the economic development has played a role, but at the same time let the country and the people pay a huge price, the luxury of medical treatment so that many people are deterred by the people because of poverty, the country to help the poor, the skyrocketing cost of medical care so that the people and the country is caught in a vicious circle, the more frightening is that the high cost of medical care will let the people can not afford to give up their lives, in the long term, will result in a common people on the In the long run, it will cause the people to have a misjudgment of life, and even affect the interpretation of the value of life. Therefore, I personally feel that medical care is not a commodity, life can not be duplicated, hospitals to change the public to a large extent or the benefits outweigh the disadvantages, but also more conducive to the national policy
Hospitals need to be controlled by the state program, otherwise the hospital has become a part of the excessive medical care, obscurantism to make money rather than treating the sick to save lives, aggravating the burden of the people, tearing the relationship between the doctor and the patient, and the same time, national program to control the hospital, you can be a country of health resources Reasonable distribution to the grassroots, now there are rural areas than in the past to see a doctor are difficult, farmers a little sick to go to the county to go to the city or to buy their own medicine to eat, no money to endure, can not endure is a serious illness, with a serious illness on the advanced stage of the damned, and the state must be tilted towards the policy, and vigorously cultivate the medical workers, in particular, to pay attention to the study of traditional Chinese medicine, traditional Chinese medicine inheritance, or else traditional Chinese medicine on the loss of the Chinese medicine, and now to the Chinese medicine hospitals seldom to see a pulse!
These are some of the most important things that you can do to improve your health and well-being.
Over the years, the policy has been to encourage personal capital to open hospitals, that is, private hospitals, to meet the needs of different groups, to make up for the existence of public hospitals in the market, but the public and private hospitals in various regions accounted for a different proportion of the public hospitals in Suqian City, Jiangsu Province, it is said that public hospitals have been converted to buy to the private sector, and then the government spent money on the construction of new hospitals, which can be said to be a lot of trouble. From the current situation public hospitals can only be strengthened, can not be weakened, whether it is the need to build a moderately prosperous society in all aspects, or the need for a healthy China, or the occurrence of major epidemics, are sufficient to prove that the public hospitals play a leading role in the private hospitals are difficult to be a heavy responsibility.
Reform is necessary and necessary, but there are still flaws in the system, to our city hospitals, for example, hospitals should be in the minds of the people is a trustworthy place. But now a lot of public hospitals do not save the lives of medical ethics and benevolence as their own faith, but the chain of interests in the first place. The essence of the doctor is to rely on technology to make a living without mixing. A lot of hospitals to take the hand of the doctor is almost no, as long as not see the death of even finished. Many hospital directors are not to think about how to improve the medical level of doctors, how to change the professionalism of medical staff, but keen to establish an ulterior chain of interests with drug dealers and suppliers of equipment and supplies. The essence of the change everything will change, lost the meaning of existence. A scold you that may not understand have revenge, then 250,000 people county-level city half of the people scolding, then this has to be worth thinking about. So I want to say that the advantages of the system is good reform is also the trend, but I hope that the essence of not lose mixed even a little bit of professionalism professional ethics have not, but also talk about what to save lives and heal healers.
Private hospitals = private enterprise = profit more good, epidemic prevention is to a large extent to serve the whole society, the two are fundamentally conflicting.
Private hospitals in order to make more profit, generally speaking, focusing on low-risk areas of low difficulty and high profits, such as beauty, plastic surgery, gynecology, men's health, health care and so on. Then there is the targeting of the rich in maternity and childbirth, the common small disease diagnosis and treatment.
As for infectious diseases, difficult and complicated diseases, especially the susceptible population = ordinary people's disease diagnosis and treatment, they are avoided, not to mention what pediatrics and other laborious and unappealing departments.
This feature is not only reflected in some of the newly established private hospitals, a city in northern Jiangsu Province, public to private hospitals, so that the city later had to spend another 2 billion to rebuild the First People's Hospital, but also other public hospitals in Jiangsu Province to support the excellent.
This time, the prevention and treatment of epidemics, support for serious illnesses in the region, mainly public hospitals, private hospitals, most of which are not useful, you usually give people double eyelid doctors to treat infectious diseases is also unrealistic.
The US is the only country with a fully private hospital, and Northern Europe is doing well with public hospitals.
U.S. healthcare spending in 2013 = $2.1 trillion, and in 2020 it's estimated it could rise to $3.2 trillion, equal to 18% of U.S. GDP.
Note that most of these expenditures are out of the pockets of ordinary Americans, not financial inputs, and it's incomprehensible that some people keep reading into it nonsense.
U.S. hospitals, even if they are touted as non-profit private hospitals such as the Mayo Clinic (more than 60,000 health care workers, belonging to the super hospital) and so on, a little more complex diagnosis and treatment program charges thousands of tens of thousands of U.S. dollars, not including the use of medication and other charges.
In 2017, the median income of full-time workers in the United States is only $3500 per month, so there is a small disease in the United States civilians, such as good, big disease, such as the death of the saying. After Chinese students arrive in the United States to understand the real situation of American health care, they realize that there are bad things about Chinese public hospitals, but the situation that American civilians have to face is even worse.
China's medical career, the attention may be not to slip into the kind of India's ridiculous "free health care", perhaps let the inputs spent more efficiently is a direction.