Xiangjian Supervision [221] No.17
Hunan Provincial Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development
Notice on Printing and Distributing Measures for Bidding and Evaluation of Housing Construction and Municipal Infrastructure Construction in Hunan Province
Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureaus of various cities and states:
According to the People's Republic of China If there are any problems in the implementation, please give timely feedback to the Construction Supervision Office of our office.
Tel: 731-8895171
Hunan Provincial Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development
July 2, 221
Measures for Bidding and Evaluation of Housing Construction and Municipal Infrastructure Projects in Hunan Province
Article 1 In order to further standardize the bidding and evaluation activities of housing construction and municipal infrastructure projects in our province and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of bidding parties, According to the Construction Law of the People's Republic of China, the Bidding Law of the People's Republic of China and its implementation regulations, the Measures for the Administration of Bidding for Housing Construction and Municipal Infrastructure Projects (Order No.43 of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development), the Measures for the Administration of Bidding for Housing Construction and Municipal Infrastructure Projects in Hunan Province (No.31 of Hunan Zhengban [219]) and other laws, regulations and rules.
article 2 these measures shall apply to the bidding and bid evaluation activities of housing construction and municipal infrastructure projects that must be subject to bidding according to law within the administrative region of this province.
article 3 bid evaluation activities shall follow the principles of fairness, impartiality, scientificity, honesty and merit selection, and no unit or individual may illegally interfere with or influence the bid evaluation process and results.
article 4 bid evaluation methods include the lowest evaluated bid price method, comprehensive evaluation method and other bid evaluation methods permitted by laws and regulations.
article 5 qualification examination is divided into pre-qualification examination and post-qualification examination.
prequalification refers to the qualification examination of potential bidders before bidding. Post-qualification examination refers to the qualification examination of bidders after bid opening.
those who have conducted pre-qualification generally do not conduct post-qualification examination.
article 6 in principle, the bidding for government-invested housing construction and municipal infrastructure projects adopts post-qualification review.
article 7 the pre-qualification system shall be adopted.
article 8 after the prequalification, the tenderee shall promptly issue a prequalification result notice to the prequalification applicant, informing the prequalified applicant of the time, place and method of obtaining the tender documents.
the notification of prequalification results shall not disclose the names and numbers of applicants who have passed the prequalification.
if there are less than three applicants who have passed the prequalification, they should re-invite bids.
Article 9 The bid evaluation committee established according to law shall be responsible for bid evaluation. The bid evaluation committee is generally composed of more than 5 people in an odd number, and the professionalism and ability of the members of the bid evaluation committee shall meet the bid evaluation requirements of a project subject to tender.
the members of the bid evaluation Committee are composed of representatives of the tenderee and experts in technology and economy, among which the experts in technology and economy shall not be less than two thirds of the total number of members. The representative of the tenderer shall have the corresponding or similar qualifications and professional ability of the bid evaluation experts.
if the technology is complex and professional, or the country has special requirements, and the experts determined by random selection are not qualified for the actual needs of bid evaluation, they can be directly determined by the tenderer after being approved by the administrative supervision department.
article 1 the bid evaluation Committee shall establish a chairman. The chairman is elected by the members of the bid evaluation committee, and the bid evaluation work is presided over by him.
the tenderer's representative shall not be the chairman of the bid evaluation Committee.
Article 11 The members of the bid evaluation committee shall carefully study the tender documents, and at least know and be familiar with the following contents:
(1) the objectives of the tender;
(2) the scope and nature of the project subject to tender;
(3) the main technical requirements, standards and commercial terms, quality standards and time limit for a project specified in the tender documents;
(4) the evaluation criteria, evaluation methods and relevant factors that should be considered in the evaluation process specified in the tender documents;
(5) important information and data required for bid evaluation provided by the tenderer or its entrusted bidding agency.
article 12 in the process of bid evaluation, the members of the bid evaluation Committee should ask the administrative supervision department for explanation on the spot if they have different understandings or are unfamiliar with laws, regulations and relevant policy documents. Other problems existing in the tender documents shall be submitted to the tenderer for clarification.
issues other than those mentioned above shall be decided by the bid evaluation Committee through collective discussion. If no agreement can be reached, the voting shall be conducted in accordance with the principle that the minority is subordinate to the majority and recorded.
article 13 preliminary review includes formal review, qualification review and responsiveness review. During the evaluation process, the bid evaluation committee may require bidders to make necessary clarifications, explanations or corrections to the contents of the bid documents.
Article 14 During the formal evaluation, the bid shall be rejected under any of the following circumstances:
(1) The bid documents are not stamped with the official seal of the bidder and the seal of the legal representative;
(2) The same bidder submits two or more bid documents or bid quotations with different contents, except that alternative bids are submitted according to the requirements of the tender documents;
(3) The bidding consortium fails to submit the bidding agreement;
(4) other non-compliance with laws, regulations, rules, pre-qualification documents and relevant formal requirements of bidding documents.
Article 15 During the qualification evaluation, the bid shall be rejected under any of the following circumstances:
(1) During the evaluation process, the bid evaluation committee finds that the bidder bids in the name of others, colludes in bidding, wins the bid by bribery or bids by other fraudulent means;
(2) The bidder's qualifications do not meet the relevant provisions of the state or the requirements of the tender documents, or he refuses to clarify, explain or correct the tender documents as required, or the clarification, explanation and correction provided cannot prove that he is a qualified bidder;
(3) The equipment of the project manager and technical director is lower than the relevant national or provincial regulations and the requirements of the tender documents.
Article 16 During the responsive evaluation, the bid shall be rejected under any of the following circumstances:
(1) The bid scope specified in the bid documents is less than that specified in the tender documents;
(2) The bidder's quotation exceeds the maximum bid price limit stipulated in the tender documents;
(3) If the project fees for green construction safety protection measures, safety liability insurance and environmental protection tax in the tender offer are not calculated according to the provisions of the provincial housing and urban-rural construction department, and the value-added tax is not calculated according to the provisions of the relevant government departments;
(4) the completion period of the project subject to tender specified in the tender documents exceeds the time limit required in the tender documents;
(5) The quality standard or warranty commitment specified in the tender documents is lower than the requirements of the tender documents;
(6) failing to provide bid guarantee according to the requirements of the tender documents;
(7) Others fail to respond to the substantive requirements and conditions set forth in the tender documents.
article 17 the bidders who have passed the preliminary evaluation shall be determined by the bid evaluation Committee according to the evaluation factors and evaluation criteria determined in the tender documents in the following ways.
(1) If the bid is evaluated by the lowest evaluated bid price method:
1. If there are less than 25 qualified bidders, all of them will enter the detailed evaluation;
2. If there are more than 25 qualified bidders, 25 bidders shall be determined to enter the detailed review according to the order of bidding quotation from low to high, and the last bidder whose quotation is the same shall be determined by random selection.
(2) If there are more than 15 bidders who have passed the preliminary evaluation, the bidding documents submitted by all the bidders who have passed the preliminary evaluation can be further evaluated and compared, or 15 bidders can be selected according to the following methods:
1. Determine the evaluation scores from high to low according to the enterprise's credit standing and performance ability;
2. according to the evaluation scores of enterprise credit and performance ability, 1 are determined in the order from high to low, and the remaining 5 are determined by random sampling.
when the number of bidders shortlisted according to the evaluation scores of enterprise credit standing and performance ability from high to low exceeds the specified number, the bidders with the same scores shall be determined in the order of credit evaluation scores and on-site safety and quality management evaluation scores.
article 18 detailed evaluation factors include construction organization design, enterprise credit and performance ability (performance and credit) and tender offer.
with the approval of the housing and urban-rural construction department, the tenderee can adjust the corresponding award setting and increase the financial status evaluation in the evaluation of enterprise credit and performance ability according to the actual situation of the project, and can adjust the β value in the evaluation of tender offer and the weight of construction organization design in the evaluation factors.
article 19 the review of construction organization design includes the construction scheme, safety, quality and environmental protection management system, project schedule planning measures, resource allocation, etc.
if the tenderer requests to adopt the building information model technology, it can include the building information model technology management system and measures in the review.
Article 2 The evaluation of an enterprise's credit standing and performance ability includes bidders' awards, standardized construction sites, performance of similar projects, credit evaluation, on-site safety and quality management evaluation, project manager, etc.
article 21 a tenderer may, according to the requirements of the project subject to tender itself, require bidders to provide similar project performance in the tender announcement. The performance of similar projects required by the tenderee shall meet the following requirements:
(1) The performance of similar projects used for qualification requirements shall not exceed 5% of the relevant indicators of the project subject to tender in principle (rounded to the nearest whole number, the same below); A project that adopts the evaluated lowest bid price method shall not take similar project performance as a qualification condition.
(2) The performance of similar projects used for judging bonus points shall, in principle, be 7% of the relevant indicators of the project subject to tender.
Relevant indicators of the project subject to tender shall be set according to the following requirements:
(1) The project subject to tender for housing construction projects adopts 1-2 indicators such as number of floors, height, building area, structure, span and single contract amount;
(2) The bidding project of municipal infrastructure projects adopts 1-2 indicators such as road length or area, bridge length or area or span or structure, pipeline diameter or pressure, cross-sectional area of tunnels and underground traffic projects, water supply capacity, gas supply capacity, heating capacity, sewage treatment capacity, garbage treatment capacity, landscaping scale and single contract amount.
article 22 a tenderer may, according to the characteristics of a project subject to tender, require the proposed project manager to give an on-site reply to the questions raised by the bid evaluation Committee on construction organization design, safety and quality management and cost control measures. If the project manager is required to reply, it shall be made clear in the prequalification documents and bidding documents.
article 23 a tenderer shall, in accordance with the bidding scope, technical requirements and national standards and norms, and follow the pricing basis and pricing methods issued by the state and the province to prepare the bill of quantities and the maximum bid price limit.
article 24 the tender documents shall set a warning line for quotation evaluation. The warning line of quotation review is 95% of the arithmetic average of the bidding quotation of qualified bidders who enter the detailed review.
article 25 the bid evaluation Committee shall evaluate the bid quotation below the warning line of quotation evaluation. In any of the following circumstances, it shall be judged that the price is lower than the cost.
(1) After evaluation and demonstration, it is determined that the bidder's quotation is lower than the cost;
(2) If the tender offer is obviously lower than other tender offers and may be lower than the cost, the bidder shall be required to make a written explanation and provide relevant materials. If a bidder cannot reasonably explain or provide relevant certification materials, it shall be deemed that the bidder's offer is lower than the cost.
article 26 the bid evaluation Committee shall make a detailed explanation and record on the situation that bidders are determined to bid below the cost in the process of cost evaluation. If the price is lower than the cost, its price is invalid and its bid shall be rejected.
Article 27 In case of any of the following conditions in the bid documents, the bid evaluation committee may require the bidder to make clarification, explanation or correction before the end of bid evaluation. Clarification, explanation or correction shall be made in writing and signed by the legal representative of the bidder or its authorized agent, and the substantive contents of the bidding documents shall not be changed.
(1) The contents in the bidding documents are ambiguous, inconsistent with similar issues, or have obvious text or calculation errors;
(2) If the amount in words and the amount in figures in the bidding documents are inconsistent, amount in words shall prevail; Where the total amount is inconsistent with the unit price amount, the unit price amount shall prevail, except that the decimal point of the unit price amount is obviously wrong; In case of any objection to the interpretation of bidding documents in different languages, the Chinese version shall prevail.
article 28 the bid evaluation Committee shall not accept the clarification, explanation or correction offered by the bidder.
the construction organization design adopts the dark mark, and the bid assessment committee shall not require the bidder to clarify, explain or correct the construction organization design.
Article 29 The information and data required for bid evaluation activities shall be the information published by official website, Hunan Provincial Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development.
Article 3 After the bid evaluation is completed, the bid evaluation committee shall submit a written bid evaluation report to the tenderer, and recommend no more than three ranked bid-winning candidates or no more than three non-ranked bid-winning candidates according to the requirements of the tender documents, and the tenderer shall determine the bid winner. When the total scores of bidders are the same, they shall be ranked according to their bid quotations from low to high.
before the bid evaluation experts sign the bid evaluation report, the chief judge of the bid evaluation committee shall organize the bid evaluation experts and invite the tenderee and the tendering agency to review.
article 31 bidding and evaluation activities for housing construction and municipal infrastructure projects that can be exempted from bidding according to law can be implemented with reference to these measures.
article 32 these measures shall come into force as of October 1, 221 and shall be valid until September 3, 226.
for more information about the engineering/service/procurement bidding, and to improve the winning rate, you can click on the bottom of official website Customer Service for free consultation:/#/? source=bdzd