57-year-old man died in Sanya hospital after doing prostate electrocision, what is the hospital's response to this

Recently, in a hospital in Sanya, a heartbreaking medical malpractice occurred, a 57-year-old man in Sanya hospital to do prostatectomy after death, how regrettable, what is the reason for this tragedy occurred in the hospital and what kind of response? How did things finally work out?

The occurrence of such a tragedy is something we are not willing to see, after the incident, the man's wife explained the situation, the operation was more than ten o'clock in the evening, they are still with the family video, then her husband's mental state is very good until 12:30 pm, her wife also cleaned up the urinary catheter, and then he slept, halfway through the nurses came to change the saline, almost a little bit, and the infusion continued. The infusion continued until about two o'clock the next day when his wife found that her husband's face was abnormal, and then how could not wake up, and then called the doctor, ready to resuscitate, but the funny thing is that the hospital's cardiac defibrillator was not even electrified, and then the patient did not work.

This happened, first Sanya Medical Commission to intervene in the investigation and will seal the medical records, they mean to determine the hospital's instruments are broken and the nurses did not do their due diligence and the patient's death whether there is a direct relationship, whether there is a direct causality leading to the death of the patient, they have also access to the monitoring of forensic evidence, and the medical records are sealed. Sealed. The patient's medical records were also sealed. Later, a reporter interviewed the hospital, the hospital refused to be interviewed, but only promised to accept the investigation of the Medical Board of Adjustment. I think in not sure whether there is a direct relationship with the hospital, depending on the results of the specific investigation,should be rational, should not just look at the surface, to give the families of the deceased an explanation, but also should respect the facts, this time to refuse the interview is the right choice, because public opinion will only make things worse.

Professionals believe that hospital medical rescue equipment should be managed by a person? , a hospital in Sanya City, a medical rescue personnel said, multi-parameter monitor can provide important patient information for medical clinical diagnosis, through a variety of functional modules, real-time detection of the human body's ECG signal, heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, body temperature and blood oxygen saturation and other important parameters. Like such an important equipment must have a professional regular maintenance, theoretically will not happen to break down such a thing.

Things have come to this, our focus is not to dwell on why the instrument will fail, an objective fact is that the patient is indeed in the hospital died, the hospital has an unshirkable responsibility, no matter from which point of view, the hospital should be given to the deceased's family compensation, hospitals should also be used as a warning to put an end to the occurrence of such deplorable medical malpractice

Then in our hearts the hospital is still a sacred place.