A: bidding and tendering activities should follow the principles of openness, fairness, justice and honesty and credit. The principle of openness is to require bidding and tendering activities have a high degree of transparency, including public information, public bid opening, public evaluation criteria and public results. The principle of fairness requires that all bidders be given an equal opportunity to participate in the competition, and that no party be intentionally excluded or discriminated against, and that fair competition not be restricted. The principle of fairness requires that the bid evaluation standards and methods are fair, and the results of the winning bid are fair; members of the bid evaluation committee should use the standards and methods determined in the bidding documents when evaluating the bids, and perform their duties objectively and impartially, and shall not accept bribes. The principle of honesty and good faith requires participation in bidding activities in good faith and honesty, and shall not obtain unlawful benefits at the expense of others, the state and the interests of society.
Q: the work should be completed before bidding
A: Article 9 of the Bidding Law stipulates: "Bidding projects in accordance with the relevant provisions of the state need to fulfill the project approval procedures, shall first fulfill the approval procedures and obtain approval. The bidder shall have to carry out the bidding project of the corresponding funds or sources of funds have been realized, and shall be truthfully set out in the bidding documents.
Therefore, the approval procedures and the implementation of the source of funds is to propose the bidding project must be completed before the two work. Approval procedures are: project approval, approval of the investment scale, approval of the source of funds, security approval, environmental protection approval. Project funds from financial resources, own funds, loans, etc., the implementation of funds related to the project performance status and the contractor's interests, must be truthfully set out in the bidding documents.
Q: common bidding
A: "Bidding Law," Article 10 provides that: bidding is divided into open bidding and invitational bidding. Open tendering, means the bidder to invite the bidding notice of the way to invite no specific legal person or other organization; Invitation to tender, means the bidder to invite specific legal persons or other organizations to bid by way of invitation to tender.
Q: whether the bidder must entrust the agency to bidding
A: agency bidding is the bidder will bidding affairs entrusted to the lawfully established agency specializing in the bidding agency business, by the agency agent bidding behavior. Article 12 of the bidding law provides: "the bidder has the right to choose its own bidding agency, entrusted to handle the bidding. No unit or individual may appoint a bidding agent for the bidder in any way. If a bidder has the ability to prepare bidding documents and organize bid evaluation, it may handle bidding matters on its own. No unit or individual shall force it to entrust the bidding agent to handle the bidding. Projects that are required by law to conduct bidding, the bidder to handle the bidding matters on its own, shall be filed with the relevant administrative supervision department."
Q: self-tendering, the conditions that the bidder should have
A: "Bidding Law," Article 12 provides that: the bidder has the preparation of bidding documents and the organization of the bid evaluation capacity, you can handle the bidding.
"Trial Measures for Tendering of Construction Projects" (State Planning Commission Order No. 5) Article 4 provides that - the bidder to handle the bidding, should have the preparation of tender documents and organization of bid evaluation capacity, including:
(a) with the project legal person qualification (or legal person qualification);
(ii) with the scale and complexity of the bidding project scale and complexity of the engineering technology, budget, property and project management and other aspects of professional and technical force;
(iii) have engaged in the same type of engineering and construction project bidding experience;
(iv) have more than three full-time bidding professional qualification bidding business personnel;
(v) familiar with and master the bidding Bidding Law and relevant regulations and rules.
Q: the preparation of bidding documents, including the content
A: the bidding documents is the bidder to provide potential bidders to introduce the project and bidding conditions for bidders to know the rules of bidding and preparation of bidding documents.
The bidding law, article 19 states: "the bidder shall prepare the bidding documents according to the characteristics and needs of the bidding project. The bidding documents shall include all substantive requirements and conditions such as the technical requirements of the bidding project, the criteria for qualification examination of bidders, the requirements for bidding offers and the criteria for evaluating bids, as well as the main terms of the contract to be signed. If the state has regulations on the technology and standards of the bidding project, the bidder shall put forward corresponding requirements in the bidding documents in accordance with its regulations. Where the tendered project requires the division of bidding sections and the determination of the duration of the work, the bidder shall reasonably divide the bidding sections and determine the duration of the work, and set them out in the bidding documents."
Q: Conditions to be met by bidders
A: After a tender notice or invitation to tender is issued, there may be people who are interested and ready to bid. However, not everyone can compete for a bid.
According to Article 25 of the Bidding and Tendering Law: a bidder is a legal person or other organization that responds to a tender and participates in the bidding competition. Scientific research projects bidding in accordance with the law allows individuals to participate in the bidding, bidding for individuals to apply the provisions of this law on the bidder.
According to Article 26 of the Bidding and Tendering Law: the bidder shall have the ability to undertake the bidding project; where the relevant provisions of the State stipulate the qualification conditions for bidders or the bidding documents stipulate the qualification conditions for bidders, the bidders shall have the stipulated qualification conditions.
Q: Delivery and Signing of Bidding Documents
A: After the preparation of the bidding documents, the bidder shall deliver the bidding documents sealed to the place of bidding before the deadline for submission of bidding documents as required by the bidding documents. The bidder receives the bidding documents, should check its sealing and signature is intact, no error after the issuance of a signature and properly stored. Signature receipt voucher should record the time, place, specific signatory, sign the number of packages and sealing status, etc., the document delivery person should also sign. No unit or individual shall open the tender documents before the opening of the tender. The bidder shall reject the bidding documents delivered after the deadline for submission of bidding documents as required by the bidding documents. In the case of joint bidding, each party to the consortium shall sign *** the same bidding agreement, clearly agreeing on the work and responsibilities to be undertaken by each party, and submit the *** the same bidding agreement together with the bidding documents to the bidder.
Q: Bid evaluation criteria and procedures of the bid evaluation committee
A: The bid evaluation committee shall work under the principles of confidentiality and independence. The bidder shall take necessary measures to ensure that bid evaluation is conducted in strict confidentiality. Members of the bid evaluation committee shall not disclose the evaluation and comparison of bidding documents, the recommendation of the winning candidate and other information related to bid evaluation. No unit or individual shall unlawfully interfere with or influence the process and results of bid evaluation. The bid evaluation committee shall evaluate and compare the bidding documents in accordance with the bid evaluation standards and methods determined in the bidding documents. If there is a bidding base, it shall refer to the bidding base. Bid evaluation methods include the lowest bid method, comprehensive assessment method or other bid evaluation methods permitted by laws and administrative regulations. Bid evaluation is divided into preliminary evaluation and detailed evaluation.
Q: the determination of the winning bidder
A: After the bid evaluation committee to complete the evaluation of bids, it shall submit a written report on the evaluation of bids to the bidders, and recommend qualified candidates for the winning bid. Using the lowest bid method of bid evaluation, can meet the substantive requirements of the bidding documents, and the lowest evaluated bid shall be recommended as the winning candidate. Where the comprehensive evaluation method is used, the bid that maximizes the satisfaction of all the comprehensive evaluation criteria specified in the bidding documents shall be recommended as the successful candidate. The successful candidate recommended by the bid evaluation committee shall be limited to one to three persons, with the order of ranking indicated. The bidder determines the successful bidder on the basis of the written bid evaluation report and the recommended successful candidate submitted by the bid evaluation committee. The bidder may also authorize the bid evaluation committee to determine the successful bidder directly.
Q: What should be done in case of inconsistency between the contractual duration and the number of time days from the contractual commencement date to the contractual completion date?
A: The Contract Law provides for the performance of the contract before and after the contract documents inconsistent with the interpretation of the agreement, as well as dispute resolution. The contract duration and start date are the substantive content of the contract, when there is inconsistency, the completion date is projected by the duration and start date in the contract agreement, and then determine whether the contractor performs on time.
Q: In the contract documents, the amount expressed in figures is inconsistent with the amount expressed in words, how should be dealt with?
A: In the case of inconsistency between a numerical and a literal amount in the Contract Documents, the interpretive convention that the literal amount prevails should be followed.
Q: engineering design, supervision and other consulting bidding why it is not appropriate to use the evaluation of the lowest evaluated bid method?
A: engineering design, supervision and other consulting bidding is not the lowest evaluated bidding method, which has two main reasons:
(1) engineering design, supervision and other consulting industry is based on the wisdom of the professionals, experience in providing consulting advice, and then create economic benefits for the client's industry. Here, the person's own quality directly determines the quality of the consulting results, thus determining the size of the contribution of its consulting results to the client.
(2) engineering design, supervision, especially the national price authorities have introduced consulting services fees industry, it is not appropriate to determine the price of consultants. The Price Law provides that the price of fees is divided into three forms of government pricing, government-guided price and market price adjustment. For projects that must be supervised in accordance with the law, the charges are government-guided prices, i.e., the charges are allowed to fluctuate up and down by 20%, but are absolutely not allowed to go beyond that, or else they are considered to be competing in bad faith and in violation of the "Price Law". Therefore, the bidding of consulting projects, it is not appropriate to use the lowest evaluated bid method to determine the winning bidder.
Q: Enterprises A and B are first and second in the overall score. Since the bidding price of enterprise A is higher than that of enterprise B, is it legal for the bidder to issue a notice of award to enterprise B?
A: Not legal. In accordance with the comprehensive scoring method of bid evaluation, because the tender price has been considered as the evaluation of content in the score, and then re-single tender price as the basis for winning the bid is obviously unreasonable. Bidders should be determined in accordance with the comprehensive score in order to determine the winning bidder, should not arbitrarily change the order recommended by the Bid Evaluation Committee.
Q: an electromechanical products imported international bidding project, bidding documents formally submitted to the Ministry of Commerce Department of mechanical and electrical and scientific and technological industries for the record, in order to shorten the procurement time, the bidder first in a provincial daily newspaper issued a tender notice. Is the bidder's practice reasonable?
A: According to the "State Planning Commission on the designation of the medium for the release of bidding announcements for projects that must be tendered according to law", the bidding announcement of the international bidding projects of electromechanical products should be published in the "China Daily", so the bidder in addition to some of the media required to publish the bidding announcement should be published in the "China Daily".
Q: A legal representative of the same natural person, A, B two bidding companies have participated in the procurement of elevator equipment in a package, A, B two companies can pass the qualification examination?
A: no. Two or more legal persons whose legal representatives are the same person, parent companies, wholly-owned subsidiaries and their holding companies, are not allowed to bid for the same goods at the same time.
Q: a company quoted for a sub-project quotes have omitted, whether the bid is judged to be invalid?
A: should not be awarded for the abolition of the bid. The omission of an item in the quotation for a sub-project does not affect the validity of the bid, and can be regarded as included in the quotation for other items.
Q: The bid price and the bid price difference is large, can be invalid bid processing?
A: No, it can not. Bidding price and bidding price is a large difference can not be used as a basis for determining whether the bid is invalid. Only the bidder can not reasonably explain or provide relevant supporting materials, can be recognized as invalid bid.
Q: a bidder provided by the legal representative of the enterprise's power of attorney is a copy, can be invalid bid processing?
A: It should be treated as an invalid bid, and the power of attorney of the enterprise's legal representative must be the original.
Q: After determining the successful bidder, the bidder, upon examination, found that the subcontracting unit selected by the successful bidder did not meet the requirements and appointed another company as the subcontracting unit of Unit A. Is this practice reasonable? Is the practice reasonable?
A: Unreasonable. According to the Measures for Bidding and Tendering for Construction Projects, the bidder shall not directly designate subcontractors.
Q: a bidding documents: if the form of consortium bidding, must be clear in the bidding documents, the lead and submit a joint bidding agreement; if a consortium won the bid, the bidder will enter into a contract with the lead of the consortium. Is this provision correct?
Answer: the error: the consortium won the bid, the bidder and the consortium's lead person to enter into a contract.
Rationale: If the consortium is awarded the contract, the parties to the consortium shall **** with the bidder to enter into a contract.
Q: A bidder's bidding documents are not sealed as required by the bidding documents, the bidder resealed and submitted before the deadline for bidding, can the bidder accept?
A: It should be accepted. As long as the bidder re-submitted before the bidding deadline for the bidding documents packaging and labeling in line with the requirements of the bidding documents, the bidder should be accepted.
Q: a project bid opening, by the notary office of the relevant personnel of the qualification of the bidding unit for examination, and all the bidding documents for examination, to confirm that all the bidding documents are valid, the formal opening of the bidding. Is this practice correct?
Answer: No. It is not correct. The notary public is not authorized to review the contractor's qualifications and bid documents, and his presence there serves only to confirm the fairness and legality of the bid opening.
Q: After the summary results of bid evaluation, one member of the bid evaluation committee did not agree with the summary conclusions, the bid evaluation committee by a show of hands, more than 2/3 of the members of the bid evaluation committee agreed to reissue the blank form, in accordance with the principle of majority rule, the bidding agent to each member of the bid evaluation committee to re-provide a copy of the blank form, in order to reevaluate the bidding documents. The bidding agent gave each member of the bid evaluation committee a new blank form to re-evaluate the bid documents. Is this practice correct?
A: No, it is not. After the summary results of the bid evaluation are available, whether all the members of the bid evaluation committee or a certain, a certain number of members of the bid evaluation committee to reevaluate, are in violation of the law to give their independent evaluation of the duty, violating the principle of fairness and impartiality.
Q: A city is required by law to carry out supervision of construction projects, its construction supervision bidding in the national and local designated media issued a tender notice. Its bidding documents include a provision on "the central, military supervision units in the province and supervision units in foreign provinces and cities into the province should also hold the registration or approval procedures of the provincial construction department". Is this provision against the law?
A: violation. The project must be bidding by law, its bidding activities are not subject to regional or departmental restrictions. No unit or individual shall unlawfully restrict or exclude legal persons or other organizations outside the region or system to participate in the bidding, and shall not unlawfully interfere with the bidding activities in any way.
Q: a government procurement project using the request for quotations to organize the procurement of two high-speed copiers, in order to facilitate the choice of the purchaser, the request for quotations documents in accordance with the general copier standards put forward the technical standard requirements. In the organization of the evaluation of the inquiry, five suppliers to provide copier quality, performance are to meet the requirements of the inquiry document on the general copier, but the price difference between the ordinary copier and high-speed copier, the purchaser decided to high-speed copier according to the unified technical parameters, requiring suppliers to quote again. Is this practice correct?
A: It is not correct.
(1) it is not appropriate to prepare the RFQ document according to the general copier standard, because the copier in this procurement is a high-speed copier;
(2) it is not appropriate to organize a second quotation from the supplier, because the RFQ procurement supplier quotes are one-time.
Q: 100 million total investment in the supervision of the tender B bidding agency qualification can act?
A: Grade B bidding agency can only act as an agent for the project investment of 100 million yuan below the project, that is, it can act as an agent for the investment of 100 million yuan below the project involves investigation, design, construction, supervision and procurement of important materials and equipment bidding. Those above this limit are not qualified to act.
Q: There is an underground human defense channel bidding project: construction area: 19,800 square meters, span of 24 meters, height 7.8 meters, how to determine the qualifications of construction companies?
A: If the construction of large excavation process, it is recommended that the selection of housing construction, municipal utilities construction general contracting level 2 and above; if the use of concealed excavation, shield construction process, it is recommended that the selection of municipal utilities construction general contracting level 2 and above, or tunneling engineering contracting level 1 qualification.
Q: Ministry of Construction 154 documents mentioned in the performance, the bidding company agent supervision bidding is not counted as performance?
A: counting the performance of the bidding agent, but the Ministry of Construction Order No. 154 of the bidding agency qualification in the amount of performance, refers to the amount of the winning bid, such as supervision of the bidding of the winning amount of 3 million yuan, can only be counted as 3 million of the winning performance.
Q: the tender notice, tender documents, bidding documents, notice of award of these links, which belongs to the invitation to offer, offer, re-offer and commitment?
A: The tender notice, tender documents belong to the invitation to offer, tender documents belong to the offer, the notice of award belongs to the promise.
Q: In practice, the competitive negotiations and request for quotations in the procurement of the difference?
A: Competitive negotiation allows for a second quotation, while request for quotation procurement only allows for a single unchangeable price.
Q: During the contract negotiation process, it is found that the performance reported by the successful bidder is false, can it be disqualified from bidding?
A: Yes, and it can be penalized.
Q: What if it is found that individual members of the bid evaluation committee scored the objectivity evaluation index incorrectly?
A: Can be based on the bid evaluation criteria, through the director of the bid evaluation committee or supervisor to urge them to correct; if they do not rectify should be recorded.
Q: The bid evaluation committee before the dissolution of the bidder should also do what work?
A: The bidder should complete the following tasks:
(1) check whether the bid evaluation report is complete, arithmetic calculations are correct, whether the signatures are complete, and whether there are small signatures at the modifications, etc.;
(2) collect all kinds of information, papers, forms, etc., involved in the process of bid evaluation;
(3) make further requests for the matters of confidentiality of the bid evaluation, and return the communication tools, announce the dissolution of the bid evaluation committee, etc..
Q: If the number of bidders passing the preliminary examination is less than three, can the bid evaluation be continued?
A: Yes. Whether to continue the evaluation of bids is decided by the bid evaluation committee, are required to make a conclusive opinion and complete the bid evaluation report. If there is no restriction on competition in the bidding documents or the bidding process or practices resulting in few or even only one bid, as long as the offer is reasonable and meets the requirements should also be evaluated and awarded the contract.
Q: What role does the bid opening record play in the bid evaluation process?
A: According to domestic regulations, the record of bid opening can not be used as a basis for bid evaluation, the bid evaluation committee only need to open the record of the problems recorded in the record as a reminder, based on the bidding documents stipulated in the bidding evaluation criteria and methods and bidding documents for comparison, and processing.
Q: the bid evaluation process, the bid evaluation committee issued a need for clarification of the bidder's unclear meaning of some of the questions need to be signed?
A: The bid evaluation committee to the bidder to issue the need for clarification of the question can not be signed, otherwise revealed the members of the bid evaluation committee. Bidder's clarifications, instructions, corrections need to be stamped with its corporate seal, legal representative or his authorized representative to sign to confirm.
Q: whether the bid evaluation committee can negate the bidding documents in a few evaluation criteria and re-formulate, add evaluation criteria?
A: The bid evaluation committee's authority is based on the bid evaluation criteria and methods in the bidding documents for bid evaluation, no power to modify and develop evaluation criteria. If all the members of the bid evaluation committee that the evaluation criteria and methods are not in accordance with the regulations, you can submit a written report to determine the bidding is invalid, the bidder to re-tender in accordance with the law.
Q: the bid opening site can be directly invalidated a bid without referring it to the bid evaluation committee?
A: No. The opening of bids is not only the bidder. No one, not only the bid opener, has the authority to judge whether a bid is valid or not at the time of bid opening.
Q: A bidder in a project bid quoted two quotes, how to sing the bid?
A: The bid will be sung in accordance with the bidding letter (original) and the two offers will be sung directly.
Q: a construction project issued two tender notices, the first time only two companies to register. The second time there are 4 enterprises registered, but before the deadline for bidding, only 2 bidders submitted tender documents, the bidder can directly determine the contractor or supplier?
A: If the project belongs to the construction project must be approved, need to be reported to the original approval department for approval can be directly determine the contractor or supplier; other projects bidders can decide on their own.
Q: Is it acceptable for bidders to submit tender documents by fax?
A: No. Because it does not meet the legal requirements for bidding documents. Because it does not satisfy the legal requirements for sealing the bidding documents.
Q: Can the bill of quantities be sent to the bidders 7 days before the bid opening?
A: No. The bill of quantities is part of the bidding documents and shall be issued to the bidders together with the bidding documents, at the latest 15 days before the deadline for submission of bids.
Q: Can a sole proprietor registered in China participate in the bidding of a domestic tender?
A: According to the Chinese regulations, a sole proprietorship registered in China can participate in the bidding of domestic tendering projects, but not if it has only set up an office in China.
Q: When bidding for the general contracting for the construction of a project, four elevators in the form of tentative estimates were included in the scope of contracting for the general contracting for a total of 1.64 million yuan, can they be procured directly?
A: can not be directly procured, it has reached the size of the standard must be tendered, according to the regulations, should be by the general contracting of the winning bidder and the bidder *** with the organization of the tender.
Q: foreign design enterprises to participate in the construction project design bidding, whether it is allowed to independently carry out the conceptual design, program design, preliminary design and construction drawing design?
A: only allowed to engage in independent conceptual design. Other design content must be joint with domestic design enterprises can only carry out the work
Q: building construction bidding, according to the qualification standards of the third level of enterprises can undertake the project, whether the bidding documents can be directly stipulated in the first level of enterprises?
A: house building or municipal infrastructure projects construction bidding, according to the qualification standards of the third level of enterprises can undertake the project, not directly in the bidding documents to provide for a first-class enterprises. Can not put forward to the potential bidders and bidding for the actual requirements of the project is inconsistent with the excessive qualification level requirements and other requirements.
Q: What types of projects can be exempted from the provisions of the "from the date of issuance of documents to the deadline for bidding not less than 20 days"?
A: The provisions of "not less than 20 days from the date of issuance of documents to the deadline for submission of tenders" and "clarifications and modifications of the solicitation documents to be issued 15 days prior to the deadline for submission of tenders" may be dispensed with in the following two cases:
(1) The project itself is not one of the projects that are legally required to be submitted to the bidding authority. (1) the project itself does not belong to the type of project that must be tendered according to law;
(2) the project belongs to the type of project that must be tendered according to law but does not meet the scale standard that must be tendered according to law.
Q: After the completion of pre-qualification, the bidder would like to add two enterprises outside the registered enterprises to participate directly in the bidding is possible?
A: Not allowed. However, if the invitation to tender, the bidder can add two more bidders after the sale of tender documents. Because the invitation to tender, the invitation is determined by the bidder, as long as the bidding deadline has not arrived, the bidder can increase the invitation list.
Q: Is it possible to determine the pre-qualification list or the list of bidders by drawing lots or shaking the number?
A: Not allowed. The National Development and Reform Commission and other eight ministries and commissions in Order No. 2 clearly stipulates that the drawing of lots, shaking the number and other methods are unreasonable.
Q: What is the basis for the bidder to qualify?
A: Based on the bidder's pre-qualification documents and the applicant's application documents, other conditions shall not be used as a basis for qualification examination.
Q: Is it permissible to modify the qualification conditions of the applicant or bidder in the pre-qualification documents or bidding documents?
A: The qualification conditions in the bidding notice and the pre-qualification documents or bidding documents shall meet the minimum requirements of the bidding project. The qualification conditions in the pre-qualification documents shall be exactly the same as those in the solicitation notice, and modification of the qualification conditions in the pre-qualification documents or the solicitation documents is not allowed. If the bidder requests to change the qualification conditions after the bidding notice has been issued, the bidding notice must be reissued.
Q: Is it permissible to terminate the bidding for the project after the bidding notice has been issued?
A: It is not permitted. Domestic regulations provide that, except for justifiable reasons, the bidder terminates the bidding after the issuance of the bidding notice, invitation to tender or the sale of pre-qualification documents, bidding documents, the relevant administrative supervisory authorities to give a warning, may be subject to a fine of up to RMB 30,000 yuan; to the bidders caused losses, the bidders shall be compensated for the losses.
Q: What are the types of bidding procedures?
A: Bidding procedures in accordance with the nature of the project is divided into general procedures, simple procedures and special procedures.
General procedures, refers to the bidding and tendering procedures without pre-qualification, through the opening of bids and then directly determined (applicable to the lowest price method) or through the evaluation of bids to determine the winning bidder. The bidding and tendering cycle in this type of procedure generally takes 15 to 25 days.
Simplified procedures, refers to no pre-qualification, through the drawing of lots to determine the winning bidder bidding procedures. Simplified procedures are applicable to simple works outside the project can draw lots to determine the bidding. The bidding and tendering cycle in this type of procedure usually takes 5 to 10 days.
Special procedures, refers to the prequalification, bidding and tendering procedures to determine the winning bidder through bid evaluation. Special procedures are applicable to the approval of the project can be pre-qualification bidding. The bidding and tendering cycle in such procedures generally takes 25 to 35 days.
The above procedures need to go to the construction administrative department for the record are ready to go.
Q: less than three bidders bidding failed, can be directly converted to competitive negotiations?
A: the need for re-tendering depends on whether the bidding project is required by law. State-owned funds in a controlling position in the procurement of goods does not ipso facto belong to the project must be tendered by law, such as state-owned enterprises in the procurement of operational materials does not belong to the project must be tendered by law. Therefore, first of all should determine whether the procurement of goods belongs to the law must be bidding projects.
If the project is required by law to bidding, submit bidding documents less than three bidders, the bidder in the analysis of the reasons for the failure of the bidding and take corresponding measures, should be re-bidding. Re-tendering after the bidders are still less than three, according to the relevant provisions of the state need to fulfill the examination and approval procedures for the project must be tendered, reported to the project examination and approval department for examination and approval can no longer be tendered, and other procurement methods; and according to the relevant provisions of the state only need to fulfill the filing procedures for the project must be tendered, you can decide not to be tendered, and other procurement methods.
If the project does not belong to the items that must be tendered according to law, and there are less than three bidders submitting bidding documents, the bidder may decide not to re-tender, and directly switch to other procurement methods.
When other procurement methods are used, it should be noted that competitive negotiation is one of the government procurement methods stipulated in the Government Procurement Law, which means inviting not less than three suppliers to participate in the negotiations; the procurement of goods by state-owned enterprises does not belong to the government procurement, but if the initiative is applied to the competitive negotiation procedure, it is recommended that at least three suppliers should be invited to participate in the negotiations
More about Engineering/ service/procurement category of tender writing production, enhance the winning rate, you can click on the bottom of the official website customer service free consultation:/#/?source=bdzd