Update 1:
I'd like you all to help me analyze this in detail! Because I really don't get it!!!! I'd like to thank you for your help.
UPDATE 2:
Actually, when I see my answer being voted on, I feel bad because I'm really trying to answer it! (Even if they don't choose me, it's still better than throwing it out for a vote.) I wonder what the netizens think of my opinion?
Update 3:
First of all, thank you, "tkkwan5", for answering my question. Although I don't agree with you, I do have a new perspective on "Delivered Voting", and I do realize that "Delivered Voting" does have its own significance! Thank you very much!
Update 4:
As for why I don't agree with you? It's because you seem to be looking at 'voters' too positively (you seem to think that every voter is cautious) and 'self-determined' too negatively. (You also seem to be talking about the attitude of the "self-determined best answerers") (not cheating by making fake votes, but just deciding on the basis of personal preference) In your expression, I think you seem to be ignoring the communication between the questioner and the answerer...
Updated 5:
I think you're ignoring the communication between the questioner and the answerer... It's as if I'm trying to give the answerer as much feedback as possible on every question I ask, especially when commenting, because I'm very serious about it, and I think it's important for me to be able to answer the questions I ask! Also when I answer a question, I am very happy to see the owner's affirmation in the comments! The reason I took the trouble to explain is that I wanted to let you know that "Decide for yourself the best answer" has its positive value, not the negative one you think it has! If I'm wrong, I'd appreciate it if you, "tkkwan5", could tell me more about it!
Update 6:
Re "tkkwan5": Thanks again for taking the time to explain what I was thinking! After everyone's input, I've been able to reflect more y on the topic of "Delivering the Vote" and "Deciding the Best Answer for Yourself". Thank you very much to everyone who participated! As for "tkkwan5"'s comment about "communication and response under the same heading", this is purely a matter of personal preference, habit, and need. If you think it's "unnecessary" or "burdensome", I respect your opinion! However, as far as my question is concerned, after such an "exchange and response", is it not a more in-depth and thorough discussion of the issue?
Update 7:
Again, "tkkwan5", you said: "If you think that people who are willing to take the time to communicate with you are providing good answers," then I can only say: "tkkwan5, you've wronged me, and it's too subjective. In fact I've never done what you say!
Update 8:
Finally, I would like to bless all the visitors who participated in this thread, and may the Lord Himself reward you for your faithfulness and labor in answering this thread!
Toto A/C's sub-holders Why do so many questioners who have gotten so many good answers are unwilling to pick the "best answer" for themselves, and instead throw it out for a second vote? 1) It's a matter of mindset. The questioner wants the respondent to choose the best answer in a fair manner. The questioner wants the person being asked to choose the best answer in a fair situation. This is not my answer, nor my question .knowledge.yahoo/question/question?qid=7008122702018 You will see that the best answer is chosen by the questioner himself Answererer: easyearning2000 (PhD level 5), but personally I think Answererer: Liar (MA level 2) is the best. But personally, I think the answer by Liar (M.S. level 2) is the best. If the questioner chooses an answer that not everyone agrees with, then it will be called out. It's like opening up a poll and saying that the majority of users chose the answer, not the questioner. This is one of the reasons. (It eliminates the chance of being yelled at after the best answer) 2) You should know that Knowledge+ now has a KnowledgeFriends thing. It's not wrong if you're a KnowledgeFriend and you answer your question. However, if the person who asked the question chooses the best answer, they will be criticized for transferring benefits. It's like a friend's answer, you choose it. If you are not a friend, you don't choose it as the best answer. My main account, too, has posted questions where I know the answer is the best, but I open it up for a vote. One of the reasons is that many people know that I'm FRIENDLY with the big favorites (Masters level 1), 癈事D人話，系朋友，先选择佢. I'd love to have someone agree with my answer. 3) Sometimes it's not the questioner himself who delivers the votes. You know, YAHOO Knowledge+, after the question expires, the questioner does not deal with the question, it will automatically deliver the vote. For one answer, 002 will be No Satisfactory Answer. With 2 answers or more, there will be no unsatisfactory answers. If this is the case, it's not the questioner who rolls an answer, it's the system that automatically delivers the vote. Can you tell me what criteria you usually use to vote for the "best answer"? Personally, I would choose the answer that fits the question if it is not a knowledgeable answer. If the answer is not to the point, even if it is a long-winded answer, I will try not to choose it. Unless, of course, every answer is the same. In addition, we will use the Knowledge Circle to vote. I have 50 votes at the doctoral level, but I use it a few times a day (sometimes I use it). To vote, when you use your mouse, move to it and vote for it, there will be a link below (HA....) (AF....) So easy to know who is the knowledge of friends, that I see the knowledge of friends, look at the answer OK, OK to vote. The other answers are less likely to be looked at. Just because a lot of people are so voting, I have an answer [Internet Service] M S N's mail time question Image reference: l.yimg/us.js.yimg/lib/ks/akp/i9/ico_qregion_ 2008-12-30100 %00NiNi Fundamentally, even the sender itself to vote for me NiNi ( Elementary School Level 5 ) 2008 -12-26 14:23:18 Vote No. 001 will lose the best answer. The first thing I can do is to send a letter to someone to vote, but I didn't do it, ANYWAY
Help the questioner and it's OK. If not, I won't even bother answering a question! To be honest, the knowledge + voting is mostly based on the family type voting/knowledge circle voting/knowledge circle voting. This situation has already appeared in Hong Kong Knowledge+ and Chima Knowledge+. So, YAHOO knowledge + voting form, a system on the letter to find someone to vote, a system of family-style voting, a system on the knowledge of friends voting. Of course, there are a lot of votes in the voting area. Now, I personally vote on the question or less people vote GE LA, because the knowledge + less people have played. I don't even want to see Hong Kong, China's Knowledge+ change to this kind of knowledge-based voting. Taiwanese people are so wannabe. I try to answer as little as possible. Hong Kong, China Knowledge, so few of them are running the business. 2009-01-12 20:01:49 Supplement: Family voting, in fact, I have joined, (Chimo knowledge + graduate students) content is so, (due to the emergence of knowledge of friends and knowledge group, many families also disbanded) YAHOO! The comprehensive discussion of the various fields of the Institute. Letter from the Department of Investment and Evaluation Issued by the Chief Executive Officer LCR(lcr)? Date of Issue Monday, February 05, 2007 Issue Text No. Min (96) [Investment Evaluation] No. 0015 Received by all colleagues Frequency of issue is irregular and depends on the situation. 2009-01-12 20:01:53 Supplementary: "Voting Section" Maximum number of votes per person per day: 08. The maximum number of votes per person per day is 08. The The #a00X after the link stands for candidate number 00X, e.g. #a001 stands for candidate number 001, and so on... (When you vote, find the candidate number mentioned in the link and answer, then vote) ※Special Note: When you vote, check the number with the link and then vote ＃Straw Hat Rufus ( Master Level 2 ) Taiwan History | Historical Figures (01).knowledge.yahoo/question/question?qid=1507013008137#a001 Evaluation Section" Maximum amount per person per day: 08 times. The maximum number of comments per person per day is 08. The The most of the solved problems, please give a positive evaluation, thank you~ 2009-01-12 20:02:45 Supplement: M S N's mail time problem Article LINK .knowledge.yahoo/question/question?qid=1008122007803
In fact, a lot of new users to send a question
, this is not unusual at all. It's not hard to win in the polls
Voters like pictures and colors
So just add those to your correct answer. But when you work slow, you get good results
I only get 1 or 2 questions a day
and it's a lot of work. As for the question mentioned by 002
The questioner was obviously playing the field
I'm the one who accused him of it
But a few words from Rausu would have been fine
Knowledge+ There's a lot of these things out there! It's not worth it to be angry at them until the sun goes down
It's not worth it.
The knowledge+ is not to be taken too seriously!
It's not worth it to take it too seriously, it's a great way to pass the time!
Thank you for your comments, and I'll be looking forward to your more detailed advice! "wshing1000-kun: You said, "Frequent voters will vote if they see a picture
with a different colored word. This is a great reminder for me, I will be more careful when I vote in the future, so that I don't let my judgment be confused by the flowers! What I don't understand is why you, "Toto-kun" and "wshing1000-kun", don't express your opinion in the answer column, but have to give your opinion in the comment column! I really don't understand! 2009-01-13 09:34:31 Add: Re『tkkwan5』: Thank you again for taking the time to explain my question! After everyone's input, I've had a deeper reflection and understanding of the topic of "Delivering the Vote" and "Deciding the Best Answer on Your Own". Thank you very much to all the visitors who participated! 2009-01-13 09:34:56 Add: As for "tkkwan5's" mention of "communication and response under the same title", this is purely a matter of personal preference, habit, and need. You think it's "unnecessary" and "burdensome", I respect your opinion! However, as far as my "question" is concerned, after such "exchange and response", is it not more important to discuss the issue more y and thoroughly? 2009-01-13 09:35:27 ADDENDUM: In addition, you said "If you think that people who are willing to take the time to communicate with you are providing good answers," I can only say: "tkkwan5, you've wronged me, and it's too subjective." In fact I've never done what you say! Lastly, I wish all the visitors who have participated in this thread a blessing, and may the Lord Himself reward you for your faithfulness, zeal, and labor in answering this thread! 2009-01-14 14:28:41 Add: To『kenchow4566』 Thank you for reminding me that "taking things too seriously" is indeed my shortcoming, I will improve! I'll work on it!
Hello~ Thank you for voting for me
thx*9999999999 On question 2, how about using Mark Wild's criteria to vote for the 'best answer'? I used to have very high standards
I wouldn't vote for him if there was a slight error or omission. But after being criticized, I will only vote for questions with no satisfactory answer or satisfactory answer.
Also. Frequent voters will vote if they see a picture
of a word in a different color. I want you guys to look at the content before you vote. ^^
Answer to Question 1: I have a different viewpoint from you, and I think that it is more responsible and fair to the respondents if the questioner does not choose the best answer! The reason is as follows: If you have a question, the questioner will most likely not be able to determine whether the answer is correct or reasonable. Even if you feel that someone's answer is particularly detailed or matches the desired answer (some people already have an answer in mind, but they ask questions because they doubt the accuracy of the answer), I think that subjectively choosing an answer as the "best answer" will always lead to incorrect choices. In order to avoid mistakes, I think it is more responsible to open up the right to choose the 'best answer' to more people. Each respondent subjectively believes that his/her answer is more perfect, and if the questioner is subjectively eliminated without a popular vote, he/she will feel unfairly treated. Comparing the questioner's self-selected answers with those open to public voting, the voted answers are more objective, fairer to all respondents, and less likely to let down the left-handed respondents. Question 2: Most people vote for the best answer they have in mind, which is what I do. Of course, there are some cheaters who use controlled accounts to create votes, which is definitely a violation of the moderation rules. I think abandoning the ballot mechanism to avoid people cheating is definitely bowing to the forces of evil! A more positive way to confront cheaters should be to report or complain about them. Do you know how hard it is for those who have answered the question with all their heart and are satisfied that their answer is perfect to be deprived of the chance to be the "best answer" provider because the questioner has counted his own "nonsensical" answer? My observation so far is that there are far more people who cheat by using the self-calculated "best answer" mechanism and self-selecting their own questions and answers than by using vote-counting. My answer is obviously different from the questioner's point of view, subjective and strong and like to self-select the "best answer" questioner will certainly eliminate my answer, which is a little unfair to my heart answer? 2009-01-12 21:04:40 Supplementary: Supplementary answer is not available, I can only express my opinion! It's normal to have different opinions, and the self-selected "best answer" certainly serves a purpose, as close to 50% of my questions are self-selected as "best answer". For those who have only one answer, e.g. asking about the location of this year's fair, there can't be another answer. If there is no other answer, I will choose the first one as soon as possible, so that other people will not waste their time by repeating themselves or writing a lot of information that I don't need. However, if I were to ask another question, such as: *** Should huge resources be used to search for an aborted baby's body in eight tons of medical waste? The answer would be controversial, and if the questioner chooses his own answer, he's bound to choose something close to what he wants, which would be unobjective. 2009-01-12 21:05:04 Addendum: I have said that there are more forms of cheating in "self-answering" than in "using multiple sub-accounts or friendly accounts to vote for yourself", because this is true! As for the questioner's choice of the "best answer", he/she must choose what he/she thinks is "good", but isn't it based on a person's preference? This person's preference may not be objective, of course, subjective also has the opportunity to coincide with the objective. 2009-01-12 21:05:14 Add: As for the questioner and the answerer in the same title of the exchange, response, I personally believe that non-essential should be minimized! Because it's fairer for each person to answer a question once. If the questioner adds to the question, the respondents may not always be able to follow up with a timely response. I prefer to pay attention to new questions and seldom follow up to see if there is any need for additional answers, because I am still very confident that my first answer has fully responded to the original question, but whether it is correct or not is another matter, and whether it can satisfy the questioner is even another matter. Whether or not the questioner is satisfied with the answer is another matter. I think it is an extra burden to consider whether or not the questioner will add to the question. If you think that people who are willing to take the time to communicate with you (chat) are providing good answers, I'm speechless.
In fact, sometimes the questions go to the voting section automatically. The questioner doesn't care about the question. Also, sometimes it's trying to be fair, 癈事d人話系朋友, or it's a self-answer. If the question is not answered in a few days, I will answer in detail. 2009-01-12 19:19:50 Supplement: With my answer to 8,000 (even Chima knowledge answer) and Hong Kong, China knowledge file (HA00008293). Good sure, session me violation. Because of this question, discussion. I'm not sure I'm in violation of the rules for this question, but I'd like to discuss it. Please be happy to post your ge opinion! I don't know why LA is answering this question all the time, but I am the one who received the violation letter. The questioner will be fine. 2009-01-12 19:22:06 PM Added: If I have to answer, I will use my own account to answer your GE question (Secondary 4), but I don't want to use the main account. 2009-01-12 20:11:24 PM Added: Answered LA, it doesn't matter whether this one goes to the voting area or not. The person who answered this question should not be able to do the vote, Taiwan that D, a lot of masters/knowledge/experts, once go to the voting area, a day already dozens of votes. If the transfer of benefits is not in the picture, the answer will be chosen by a good ghost. Therefore, in Taiwan, we don't need to use the intellectual circle and family to WIN, the chances are very slim. But now there is no more Chima family to help me. Plus, many people in the Knowledge Circle don't play LA because Knowledge+ is too unfair. There is no one in Hong Kong, China to vote, and no one in Hong Kong to vote. However, I think it's best to get the best answer, but if you can't, it's OK to help the person who asked the question.