If the light quantum therapy instrument is honest as the conscience of the doctor said, the oxygen directly into the infusion bottle, pressurized through ultraviolet radiation to patients, such a practice, I asked the hospital personnel, are that direct input into the vein does exist in the operation of unscientific, not only should be immediately stopped, but also should be compensated for the resulting injury, for the The responsible person should also be punished according to the relevant regulations. I think not only conscientious doctors will come forward, but also most of the medical staff will resist this practice. And I am proud of the conscientious doctor's dedication.
But another aspect, I think the conscience of the doctor should be necessary to explain to everyone:
1) How many homes in Shanghai are currently using the light quantum therapeutic instrument, is a specific number, rather than "much", not "quite a few ", how many medical units in Shanghai, how many investigated, how many in use and your hospital the same model of the same manufacturer's products.
2) How many manufacturers of light quantum therapeutic instrument? I think it is also necessary to know this aspect of the situation, because your hospital used to look at the photos you provided and the situation, perhaps may be substandard products. But we can't just dismiss all the manufacturers and say that all of them are unqualified. For example, the production unit in question has obtained a certification license for medical equipment (what are the specific documents, please inform any informed users, I only know that three certificates are required)
2 The problem with the photon therapy method
I'm not a professional but I'm willing to talk about my opinion, as we learned during the SARS As we learned during the SARS outbreak, a mature medical treatment requires product development, animal testing, and human volunteer testing, and after so many steps, if the efficacy can be determined, and the side effects are within the controllable range, then such medicines and products can be introduced into the clinic, and I don't know if you have any more informative information in this regard at hand? Because in your article only mentioned that your hospital used a "self-edited" animal experiments and clinical application of data compilation ", so in addition to this fake manufacturers, other manufacturers have this information? Because you then by your hospital and then to the whole treatment method, not only you say that said to a manufacturer, but also include nuclear this treatment method of other manufacturers.
So, I think we should be prudent to treat a treatment, both to it into the clinic and strict gatekeeper, but also not because of a factory's products and affect the treatment of a party hair, I think this aspect not only need to appeal to the relevant parties, but also need to the spirit of science. You have been a doctor in this area, I think more should be responsible, but not simply a little data, for example, you mentioned that "I have also in April 2002 to December 31, 2002, **** chose to accept the 230 "three high" symptoms of the case, to carry out the above treatment, the light drug separate treatment, only 37% of the cases were treated with the light drug. Separating the light medication, only 37 cases were effective, and all of the effective cases refused to discontinue lipid-lowering medication in conjunction with the treatment and had been advised to take other health care measures, so there was no therapeutic significance to the comparability." , I think it is very important to report this information to summarize it in a paper, such as what methods were used, criteria for validity, statistical methods, discussion of conclusions, etc., and I think if this is done, it is much more persuasive than a simple list.
As for the personal tendency of some of the views of medical workers, such as "deliberate" "kickbacks" (to add a point, you said that the list of open photon therapy instrument "kickbacks "Is it cash or in-hospital billing? A therapeutic instrument of more than 4000 yuan, ten units of rebate and large medical equipment is also minimal compared. (But you can take out your evidence, sue your hospital personnel) These people will have their own views, no longer discussed. Once again, I am a non-professional, and not the right place, please the author himself and everyone to teach, but also pro-conscience doctors, take care of your health.