There are many other countries that are in a similar situation as Nigeria.
Such as "Chad, Cameroon, Sudan, C?te d'Ivoire, Ethiopia, Tanzania, Kenya, Mozambique, Ivory Coast, Zambia, Uganda and other countries. Almost all countries are in the same situation as Nigeria, except those with less than 20% of arable land, such as Namibia, Niger,, Mauretania, and so on.
Agricultural inputs are too low, and with a deranged low standard of industry.
Modern agriculture is not just a matter of throwing seeds, it involves four major industries, namely, systematic breeding, agricultural products, agricultural machinery and agrochemicals, as well as dozens of secondary industries.
For example, in Nigeria, agricultural implements are almost impossible to manufacture. They don't have the quality of steel from the steel mills to make hoes
There are no chemical plants, so they can't make pesticides, fertilizers, etc.
Without the support of the "Agricultural Universities" that the Chinese don't even look up to, and therefore with almost zero agricultural scientists, it is almost impossible for them to set up a breeding company to do breeding for the huge amount of arable land they have.
No heavy industry to support, can't make farm vehicles to transport farm materials, can't make tractors, can't make irrigation pipe tools
No cement industry, so almost all the canals are mud canals, the disadvantage of mud canals is that when rainfall is heavy, the dam may be broken, and Nigeria and other countries have heavy rainfall, and when the rainy season is not sufficient, almost all the farmland will be destroyed by the mud canals, but it's not enough. almost all the farmland will be flooded.
They have no light industry, so even the sprayers for pesticides have to be imported.
They need not just agriculture, but a whole industrial system! But helplessly, African countries to develop industry, almost impossible ...... because the world's two open industrial powerhouse - China AD the United States, occupies about 80% of the world's industrial capacity, almost crushing the world's industry. High-end industrial bulk manufacturing is dominated by the U.S., and almost no country in the low-end and mid-range markets can last a round in front of China.
So the elites of African countries have a deep despair ...... because they can't even develop agriculture. Even just honestly being a farmer ...... can't get in the way...because of all the things they don't have.
Then some of you may say, isn't the world aiding Africa?
But we only see China's aid to Africa in the form of stadiums, schools, and the opening of mines to dig for resources. We only see the United States in Angola mining oil, Sinopec and PetroChina entrenched in North and South Sudan and Central Africa, China Metal entrenched in Nigeria, Tanzania, we only see the French industry entrenched in the Ivory Coast.
The U.S. is aiding animal sanctuaries, rainforest preservation, and providing medical aid to a number of countries. All we see is France aiding all kinds of medical supplies, weapons and ammunition, and the Brits aiding a bewildering array of universal values, min boiled theory.
When have the five hooligans ever assisted a smelter in Africa? A chemical plant? When have they ever aided a whole set of heavy factories? These are all about national capital, we even if we do not say ...... who has aided even a plastic factory?
Woody ...... everyone is crazy about mining resources. And manufacturing Africa's needs as they intend.
E.g. the British manufactured Africa's political needs while borrowing countless loans to earn money. The U.S. and France manufactured Africa's weapons needs and exported all kinds of weapons. China manufactured Africa's industrial needs and dumped them in Africa. The British and Americans jointly create Africa's food needs while dumping food.
In short, we use countless means to create demand.
So, in the words of the former President of Nigeria, "Africa's strength and rise can only be achieved by the hands of Africans" or as the Prime Minister of Tanzania put it, "Africa looks forward to the dawn in despair, and what we have to do is not to wait because our darkness is given to us by the world, what we What we should do is to move forward into the light, even if we are stumbling ...... never wait"
This is agriculture in Africa .......
After giving you an overview of the basic state of African agriculture earlier, I believe you should also understand why third world countries are sitting on so much good land but are unable to develop modern agriculture. The reason is that modern agriculture is linked to industry and has a relationship with each other that cannot be isolated, a relationship similar to that between a colorful flower and a hard-working bee. Flowers need bees to pollinate in order to reproduce, and bees need to suck nectar in order to survive, interdependent.
So, here to give you an introduction to the status of African industry, I try to write carefully, because there may be business people will touch the African business or interested in Africa, of course, there may be aspiring young people are willing to go to this wide range of market development, I write is not comprehensive, because, after all, involves dozens of countries, which has thousands of words on the word to say all the reason. May my shallow insights to you all the silk awareness, fortunately!
African industry-(1)
Africa used to have two industrial powerhouses, one of which is still a country with more industrial categories. One was Egypt, far away in North Africa (geopolitically,
Egypt should be a Mediterranean country, and has little to do with Africa), and the other was the southernmost South Africa.
And around the 1970s of the last century, countries led by the United States and Britain launched a famous movement - the global integration movement. The term must be very, very familiar to all of us, building a global village, global collaboration and division of labor among countries. So in the U.S. and Britain's efforts to hold out the ocean of countless writings, y global dignitaries, business and industry elites agree, although it could not convince the economists and militarists at the time, but the vast global integration in the seventies began to frantically movement.
Here it is necessary to introduce the basic core of global integration, global integration can be finished in one sentence, that is - countries division of labor, financial integration, trade liberalization, political transparency as the core of the three a work. In global integration, the United States and Britain took the lead to take their own knife, of course, they eat meat well ...... the United States serves as the global division of labor in the financial core of the dollar as the core of the world's economic flows to New York as the first U.S. East Coast as a global financing center as the goal of the U.S. as the core of global scientific and technological progress. And Britain as the European financial core, financing center. With the situation at that time, Britain and the United States simply take the knife to cut their own JJ rhythm.
They took the lead and started the famous de-industrialization movement, such as the U.S. Pittsburgh steel began to Europe, South America and other places to transfer (of course, later transferred to China). Because Britain and the US did this kind of thing, it was ...... very convincing for politicians in third world countries and newly emerging countries. The reason is simple, the third world countries at that time; such as Nigeria, Cameroon, Tanzania and a whole lot of other African countries, were all countries that had not long been independent of Congo, and even some of them, such as Central Africa, Congo, Uganda, etc. were still in an extremely chaotic political mode. Politicians with a globalized vision hardly exist in third world countries, let alone politicians. In the emerging countries, such as Egypt, Argentina, the Four Little Dragons of Asia, and so on, all the ruling parties are extremely inexperienced, and most of them have between twenty and thirty years of experience in power. Most of them have between twenty and thirty years of experience. They have virtually no experience in governing and have no vision of globalization.
So, in the vast global division of labor. Countries like Egypt and Greece in North Africa successfully de-industrialized and developed agriculture and tourism. And far away in the southern section of the then developed countries, South Africa has been holding firm ...... until the one who harmed South Africa, and even harmed all the blacks on the road to emergence of the famous blacks before the emergence of the blacks have been more industrial categories and many of them are the world's top-level industrial countries. But ...... South Africa's fated enemy, Mandela, came, and so at the end of the last century page ...... Africa's last country that had largely gone industrial, South Africa also industrialized in the hollowed out and successfully de-industrialized, resulting in the existence of virtually no industrial state in all of Africa.
Because of the absence of industrial countries in Africa, it has led to a truly global integration of agriculture in Africa, closely dependent and reliant on industrial countries. Because of the lack of industry, it was also almost like a godson in military and political terms. Having to trade with Europe and America.
Some might ask then. Were the evils of de-industrialization not clear to the countries of the time? Why go for such a *** thing? In fact, on the proposition of global integration, you do not know? To date, it is still very very marketable yo
Because everyone wants to be the top position in the world system of the country, I give you a description of a scenario, you do a multiple-choice question.
Which life would you rather choose?
1: Sitting in a clean and bright office, using a computer to handle all your work, only working no more than 30 hours a week. Vacation no less than 80 days a year and earn $50,000 or 300,000 RMB a month.
The family lives on the edge of a large lake, in a luxurious villa, the air is sweet, the city is in the forest, blue sky, white clouds, lush flowers and trees. The river was so clean you could see the fish swimming in the water and there was hardly any ambient noise.
2: Working in a factory, doing manual labor, working at least 60 hours a week or more. You get less than 20 days of vacation a year, and your monthly salary is just 500 US dollars or 3,000 RMB. The family lives in a crowded city where the air is so polluted that they don't see the sun for a year. Flowers and trees are being planted, but the bright green leaves are no longer visible; each leaf is covered with dust, causing the flowers and plants to be black. The river is simply ...... colorful because of industrial emissions, and everywhere there is the noise of factories starting up and big trucks for all kinds of transportation honking like crazy.
Which life would you rather choose? You know, anyone would choose the first life, so de-industrialization is a y popular behavior. Let's let other countries do the heavy manual labor. We engage in tourism ah, engage in culture ah, play financial ah will make money ...... is not beautiful.
This is the future that almost all de-industrialized countries described to their citizens back then. All the countries mouth - manual labor for other countries to do, but who the hell knows who this other really is?
So it wasn't just Egypt and South Africa that were affected by the frenzied de-industrialization campaign. There was also Nigeria, where industry was already taking off at the time, Zambia in the southern section of the East African Rift Valley, and Tanzania and Mozambique. Though they had more than their fair share of civil strife at the time, there were still many black elites who carved out land and desperately tried to develop industry at the time.
Maybe no one will remember that Lusaka back then was also lined with chimneys, Maputo back then had factories, and Malawi back then could talk the talk. Abuja back then even threw out the tone that they were going to be the new Berlin.
But the wave of de-industrialization swept almost the entire African continent, with South Africa and Egypt making acts that made all countries guilty of dilemmas. The result is the dilemma we have today. So for example, Nigeria, Africa's big oil producer, they have oil fields and their economy is growing at what was once the world's number one rate of growth at a furious pace. But there is no backbone, because any GDP generated from selling oil is just a pawn in the chariot that is the United States, and any fluctuation in the dollar leads to a huge jolt in Nigeria's income, and with every jolt, a cascading effect occurs, and so every dip and rise in oil and every depreciation of the dollar leaves countries like Nigeria in agonizing pains and in tears.
Angola, for example, and Central Africa, for example, and Mozambique, are all resource-based countries. There are rich mineral deposits, but ...... are just a pawn in the super chariot. Because of financial kidnapping, the biggest challenge on their industrial operations is actually the cost of debt.
Angola, for example, opened a metal mining industry. The cost of debt actually takes up the sum of all the costs. And all of those debt costs come from financial loans generated in the West. A copper mine, assuming a ton of $ 100 (just assuming haha), mining costs, equipment wear and tear, labor costs, logistics costs, land costs all together may be thirty dollars. But the interest on the loan will be as high as 50 dollars. The cost of both is 80 dollars. Profit is only $20. The slightest fluctuation in the international market for finished products ...... would be insolvent and lead to the mining industry being mortgaged to foreign companies.
Numerous examples have proved that the West plays African countries almost exactly the same way. The data given in "African Industry", shocked the rhythm of urine pants, almost 90% of Africa involved in the development of industrial companies (such as oil, minerals) founding companies are not Europe and the United States, actually 90% of Africans started. But this is 90% of the enterprise, almost all fell into the United States, Britain, France, China as the first four rogues in the hands. Africa is not the world of Africans, but the United States, Britain, France, China, the four countries competing in the hunt often the remaining 10%, 9 become foreign enterprises founded (such as Sudan PetroChina enterprises, such as Central Africa, China Metals opened the mines, etc.), less than 1 of every 100 enterprises belonging to Africans!
African Industry - (2)
In (1), the basic industrial situation of African countries was basically described.
Summarized as; to what no rhythm ...... So, the black uncle can only long sigh: "rich and powerful and I such as floating clouds, idle as sun dick go!"
The development of Africa, where the group of heroes is also very good. And the four big rogues (the five permanent except Russia can be) are almost all used all the means in the development of Africa.
Although we scum will not care about the future direction of the world's development, but the five rogues know ah
The U.S. market has reached saturation, the European market has no growth rate. Emerging markets, foreign companies are difficult to involve China, a huge consumer market, and the Indian market is an open market, not easy to compete with Indian companies in India. So the fastest growing market for world economic development after 2040 is definitely going to be in the vast Africa.
African consumer market has a faster circulation speed than the United States (mainly black uncle does not save money, Americans can save money than the black uncle), there is better than the European market inclusiveness, and absolute liberalization of the market, so the countries are bound to compete for the African market
And the competition for the market is the prelude to the "industrialization of localization The other company mines African iron ore, which is processed in Africa into steel just now and then manufactured into soup ladles.
Who, pray tell, will win between the two companies? As long as the IQ normal will categorically say that the latter will win, the reason is very simple ...... because the latter company took full advantage of the cheap manpower in developing countries, took advantage of the tax concessions in developing countries, took advantage of the cheap minerals in developing countries, and eliminated the cost of shipping. How can they not win?
The manifestation of this in the marketplace would be that the former's spoons might be ten dollars a piece and the latter's might be three for ten dollars, a buy ten get one free rhythm.
So the localization of industry is the most critical part of the competitiveness of enterprises (so General Motors will "sell the country" to move the Detroit production line to China)
Some people may say, since everyone judges that Africa will become the fastest-growing and the most robust market in 2040, then the African countries in the What? Why don't you follow the example of Deng Xiaoping? I'd like to take advantage of this opportunity," he said.
Not to mention, African black uncles aren't all about the big dicks. They also have very insightful people, one of them almost succeeded in the rhythm of the ...... this person is the French got killed Gaddafi.
Libya is far away in North Africa, but after all it is a part of Africa. So Libya's Gaddafi united more than a dozen countries in Africa to prepare for the formation of the African Development Bank and the African Central Bank, finance is prior to industrial action, because the financial sector is the blood of industry.
So the elites of African countries all kinds of support, said will be resolute around the central collective under the leadership of Gaddafi, resolutely support the correct decision of the AU, and to the meeting of the Nigerian delegates pointed out that: "Comrade Gaddafi's proposal is in line with the laws of historical development, is the only way for the people of Africa to run to the road of well-being, and also the people of Africa stand up to the It is also the only scientific guideline for the African people to stand up". During the meeting, Comrade Gaddafi's statement was y embraced by African leaders, and the scene erupted with snapping sounds.
Gaddafi's formation of the AfDB, almost simultaneously offended the four major rogues (Russia has fewer interests in Africa), in order of the degree of injury, if the AU financial integration is established, France damaged first. The reason is that the banks of the French colonial countries are almost all controlled by France, such as the countries along the Ivory Coast, almost all of them are French puppets. If finance is once detached from France, industry will be detached, so infrastructure and mining exploitation will be detached, which will ultimately lead to France being unprofitable. Then it's the Americans who are more severely damaged, after that it's the British, and finally China.
So, if this Gaddafi operation had been successful, factories should have started to spring up in Africa today. But ...... Sarkozy directly raped Gaddafi ......PS (I personally am very skeptical that Gaddafi is not too high on drugs to dare to mess with the five hooligans at the same time)
So, today's Africa... ...is not the world of Africans, but rather the madness of the Chinese in Africa ...... In Western terms it's literally a three-day, three-day story.
African industry has nothing to do with Africa ......After a key link is out of control, African countries are nothing more than playthings in the hands of the four rogues. Africa's in the four great shadows ...... dawn in the distance, rise in the future ...... but the future belongs to one of the four hooligans ...... never belong to Africans!
That year Gaddafi, who was also the rotating chairman of the AU ...... proposed the monetization of African currencies, the establishment of an African central bank, a massive injection of capital into the African Development Central Bank, and the expansion of the capital reserves of the central banks of various countries, including the stabilization of the financial markets in Africa, and so on... ...he took them all into account
But one thing Gaddafi didn't know was that the more he thought about it, the more he would offend the big rogues. ......
After he assumed the rotating chairmanship of the AU and convened the African Financial Conference... ...Gaddafi has pronounced a death sentence on himself, he has challenged all the big rogues.
The big hooligans may tolerate a Gaddafi who is all over the world, but they will never tolerate one who tries to unify Africa! Even a nuclear-armed Gaddafi can be tolerated, but not a Gaddafi with an African central bank and the African dollar (similar to the euro) in his hands. It is possible to tolerate him screaming all over the world and provoking the authority of the big rogues, but it is absolutely impossible to allow him to have the slightest delusion of challenging the big rogues' interests in Africa.
So ...... his death is inevitable, just need to find an excuse. All the hooligans will acquiesce ...... to take out Gaddafi!
African Politics-(1)
The last section talked about African industry and covered a lot of political stuff, probably some of which has been skewed all over the place under the influence of modern media whores. So in this section we talk about the politics of black uncles having fun!
Africa has a very long history, but there aren't many accomplished empires in African history, except for Ethiopia, the one-time Sultan's empire, and the Songhai empire, Africa has almost no history to hold. Africa's history is a history of colonization, starting thousands of years ago.
The Sudanese Empire, for example, once thousands of years ago, was tragic. The Egyptian king's ruler's title for; "the king of Upper and Lower Egypt, after the Sudan's ruler" Upper Egypt is said to be close to the line of today's Ethiopia to the middle of the Nile River Basin, Lower Egypt is the plains part of the estuary, and after the Sudan is the history of the famous gold-producing empire, the Sudanese empire. The Songhai Empire, for example, was a tragedy.
So, because of these reasons, Africa has hardly developed any local politics of its own, much less outstanding politicians. Because Africa's great powers were too rare, Africa's culture was almost primitive. Anything plus the word primitive, almost is the three no products, many countries in Africa no text, no pass language, no pass measurement, etc. ......
So, we understand the history of Africa, in fact, only need to look at the last few hundred years can be before the good tragedy of said.
Why do you need to know their culture, their history? Because the soil of politics is culture and history ...... And politics in Africa started at the beginning of the first world war.
African countries have several factions in terms of politics, all of which are related to the former sovereigns ...... One is the **** and system, the second is the constitutional monarchy system, and the third is the pan-democracy system. But unfortunately all three have a strong monarchical ideology.
The history of independence of African countries, the part south of Hazara, almost all of them except Ethiopia were enslaved countries, and the independence frenzy appeared after the end of the Second World War. The independence frenzy began mainly with the British colonies, led by South Africa in the south, and the French colonies, led by Nigeria in the Ivory Coast.
Global politics are almost always the same, with the various tribes, groups of people, and classes having different demands during the independence process, so mishandling it can lead to chaos. After the independence frenzy passed, Africa went on a wild ride of civil wars.
And most of the African countries, the basic end of civil wars is in the 90s to 2005 this fifteen years to do the basic end of civil wars (the reason everyone guessed)
And because of these various reasons, coupled with the reasons mentioned earlier, led to the African politics is extremely naive and short-sighted.
In my personal experience, Africa's politics is almost naive to what point it ...... For example, one of their presidents, the level of governance is the level of a town mayor in our country, the more excellent and outstanding is also our deputy county commissioner or director of the level of the tease.
Africa's several small powerful countries, such as Tanzania, South Africa (pseudo BRICS), Nigeria and so on ...... its national ministerial level people, hold up is a deputy governor, the president hold up is a county commissioner level.
And down to the governor of the province, the level of rotten is simply insane, and the national army chief is a spell. And their grassroots governors (e.g. county heads) are not even as good as a keyboard warrior in a political powerhouse such as China/Russia, a country with universal politics.
The reason for this odd situation is that during the independence process, these illiterate families, tribes picked the fruits of victory and formed a unique political grouping, resulting in the real black elite class not being able to enter the black African countries.
Their politics have sucked to the point where, for example, one of the former presidents of C?te d'Ivoire, a black American ~ returned to C?te d'Ivoire, and within a few years had successfully revolted and become president. Such examples are no longer news in the great land of Africa.
The political level of the Americans, such as Bush and Obama, say he has the level of a Chinese mayor's administration are considered to lift them up. You say they there black Americans, a human mongrel actually went to Africa to become president, the level of how ...... everyone is also clear.
Of course, not for the sake of black them and black ...... because after all, a lot of times we have to black them, because Africa really do not have to take the means to come.
I'll give you an example!
Angola used to be the United States of America's staunch lackey, because Angola has a relatively rich oil, so the United States empire is all kinds of coaxing his godson to follow them, because after a few coups, Angola has also undergone some changes, coupled with the United States of America's President Bush Lord blind to the United States of America's global strategic deployments after 2000, resulting in shrinking funding. So African affairs the US empire went focused, which means it was mainly against France and the UK, and reduced funding in areas that were already ripe for the picking.
So Angola was a pace the US empire didn't piss on for quite some time. And the biggest opportunity arose because Chinese industry started to rise like crazy after 2000 and started to compete violently with US industry. The United States for a variety of reasons, industry continues to shrink, and Angola, a weak country, no matter who the daddy is ...... life always have to dress and eat ...... so, began to trade with China.
Switching trade objects is one way for a country to break away from the economic control of another big country, so Angola's black politicians are very excited. Because Angola has oil, but regional development is uneven, black Angolan politicians thought they should now have as little contact as possible with the U.S. empire and not buy U.S. goods if they could ......
At the time, they were advised by their Chinese handlers (all mainly Angolan Chinese merchant guilds) to still buy U.S. products, which meant that Angola should buy U.S. products, and that they should buy U.S. products. That is, Angola should keep the incremental part under their control (that is, the consumption growth part and trade with China), but try not to reduce the US trade. This move is actually quietly into the village, shotguns do not want to well ...... good simple to say
But black politicians are very radical, either do not do, to do to do absolutely. Because they do not know that the mainstay of international confrontation in the years of peace is trade rather than military, so trade has to be done as a military operation. At that time they had a simple brain ...... a soup ladle, the American Empire's five dollars a hand, the Chinese repair five dollars five hand. Why the hell should we trade with the American Empire? So they adopted an equalization strategy on tariffs, which caused the American Empire's products to begin to experience serious stagnation.
And they further opened up the list of Chinese products, leading to a rhythm of almost total siege of Chinese goods against American Empire products. Why is the godson not listening?
It is okay, Angola's trade is not very large, the United States empire just talked about the trade balance and trade equality a few times, and did not Angola what to do. Angola then at least hit the chicken blood, because at that time Mozambique began to contact China, and their neighbors Zambia ...... when they learned of the mineral development conditions offered by China, instantly feel that they should cooperate with China.
So Angola began to use the American Empire's trade liberalization as the reason, the oil, minerals gradually began to sell to China ...... results by the U.S. empire counterattack ...... Angolan politicians dead and wounded a large number of and the U.S. empire began to support the opposition forces. Angola all kinds of suffer no bird ...... and the U.S. empire directly locked Angola's loan and the expiration of the loan of a slightest not concessions as a means of forcing Angola ...... that is, a few strokes down, Angola can not stand it, can only kneel down to sing "Conquest" rhythm! ......
The low level of politics has led to the economic pattern of African countries is almost the East Indian Ocean ...... is simply a big storm all the time. For example, Cameroon and other ...... are like this, do not know what is biding their time and progressing step by step ...... they are very much like to play the big news, again, often pressed to fuck. For example, the French, and even go out of their way to use forceful means against small African countries, directly stormed the ...... simply cutlery.
For example, the British, moving to support a large number of opposition out
Their political fragility is simply deranged degree, and I can responsibly say a word ...... most of the leadership of African countries, do not even know what the constitution, according to my statistics, at least nine countries constitutions are directly copied from the four rogue constitutions.
For example, South Africa's "statesman" Nelson Mandela, whose glorious deeds have been glorified by the four hooligans to the extent ...... that he personally castrated South Africa as a developed country and turned it into a third-world country.... ...really special yards of funny
Speechless ......
While Mandela is now being celebrated by the global media, the reason for being celebrated is simple ......he personally pinched a can dominate sub-Saharan Africa and successfully pressed South Africa from a developed to a developing country.
Comrade Mandela has accomplished a great task ...... is that the five hooligans dreamed of destroying South Africa in those years, but have not been able to get what they wanted ...... but the God gave Mandela, will not smile open face?
Do you remember? In the years after Mandela became active, China began to soar in southern Africa, and began to build deep "friendships" with Angola, Mozambique and other countries that had once not been our champions
Mandela ...... is being celebrated in our From our point of view, he was a good ****ing member of the Labor Party, a good **** and member of the Party, and a good French citizen ...... And what's even better is that he was a good Aussie! But if one takes the African position and the South African stand copy...this man can be pulled out and shot a thousand rounds!
Forever! Mandela!