First, if the vehicle has an accident with the permission of the owner, the vehicle mainly bears certain responsibilities.
When a vehicle needs maintenance, it is sometimes a big problem, such as changing the engine and changing the gearbox. These problems require the vehicle to go out for a test drive, and the owner also agrees psychologically. The relevant agreement may not be signed (if it is a 4S shop, some maintenance agreements should be signed), and the vehicle may be driven out.
The staff of the ordinary repair shop may not pay attention when they go out for a test run, and a traffic accident occurs, causing death. In this case, the owner is responsible. This responsibility is entrusted responsibility, and the owner's responsibility is very small, but he still has to bear certain responsibilities.
According to the relevant provisions of the law, if the manager and the user are not the same person and a traffic accident causes damage, the driver of the motor vehicle shall be liable for compensation, and if the owner of the motor vehicle is at fault, he shall bear certain responsibilities.
In this process, the owner acquiesced that the vehicle can be driven out, so in this process, the owner has certain responsibilities. Of course, this responsibility is very small. Some netizens think that car owners have certain responsibilities? Sure! As an adult, you will naturally know that driving outside may cause an accident.
Car owners may feel wronged, and they may learn from this incident. You'd better be careful when repairing the car in the future. Otherwise, you may get into a lawsuit because of your negligence, and you may lose some property and lose a little money.
Second, if the owner does not allow it, there is no need to bear the responsibility.
If the vehicle is not overhauled, such as touch-up painting and bumper replacement, there is no reason for the owner to agree to the garage staff to drive the vehicle out, because these jobs do not need to go out for a test drive. The staff member drove out without permission, and if something happened, the staff member was naturally responsible.
If the responsible party is a pedestrian, then the staff of the repair shop also needs to bear certain liability for compensation, and the owner does not know about it, so there will be no joint liability. Some people question that this responsibility should be borne by the repair shop, and the repair shop should claim compensation from the employees. The determination of this legal liability has nothing to do with the owner and is beyond our discussion.
The employee of the garage drives out without permission. If there is an accident, the responsibility is naturally his, not the garage's. If he drives improperly, he needs to bear the responsibility, not only for compensation (compensation for the maintenance cost of the victim's family and the owner's car), but also for losing his job.
Because of him, the owner and the garage may still have lawsuits, because the garage needs to compensate for the loss of the vehicle. If the used car is sold and recorded in the maintenance record, it will depreciate greatly. The cost must be paid by the repair shop. After the repair shop pays, it will claim compensation from the employees.
Sometimes, you have to watch the car repair, otherwise, the car may be driven out. If something goes wrong, many people will feel uncomfortable. The car is your own, not someone else taking it out and driving it casually. In this case, the owner may sell the car.
Third, the employees of the repair shop drive out privately. Although the nature remains to be investigated, the owner has the right to sue.
It is unacceptable for the owner to drive the vehicle out by the employees of the repair shop without permission, especially if there is a car accident. The question here is whether the employee stole it or not. Some people think this car is good. Although there is no big car, it is still possible to sell it at a good price. This possibility is still there!
If so, the car was driven out by an employee of the repair shop, and an accident happened, then this person should not only bear the liability for compensation, but also bear the legal liability. It is also the responsibility of the repair shop that the owner does not have to pay compensation. His cooperation with the repair shop should be over.
Another possibility is that it was stolen. If there is a car accident, the responsibility is the employee's, but the owner has the right to keep the lawsuit. Because this mistake was caused by poor supervision of the repair shop. You can't blame anyone else! If the owner and the repair shop go to court, the repair shop needs to compensate the owner for the loss. There will be no cooperation between the owner and the repair shop.
The repair shop should not have thought that a little negligence in supervision would lead to such a big problem. After the lawsuit between the repair shop and the owner is finished, it's time to clean up the employees. As for whether he should get labor compensation or labor punishment, it is a matter for the repair shop and employees to negotiate, and it has nothing to do with the owner.
As a car owner, what you need to do is to keep the relevant evidence and use it when suing the repair shop. Although the car was hit and angry, anger could not solve the problem. Preserving the evidence is the key. It's not good to meet such a repair shop.
It is normal for the owner to go to the garage to repair the car. Unusually, the employee drove out and hit someone. If there is a problem, solve it. There is no need to make trouble with yourself because of the fault of the employees in the repair shop. Because Plato said that being angry is to punish yourself for the mistakes of others. what do you think?