This is the first time I've used an OPPO wearable, and I'm currently using the Huawei Watch 3 as my main wearable, and there are almost no detailed comparative reviews of the two on the web.
The so-called I don't go to hell who goes to hell?
The OPPO Watch 2 ECG Edition is a new device for the OPPO Watch 2, and it is a great way to compare the OPPO Watch 2 ECG Edition with the Huawei Watch 3, at the risk of being besieged by the two iron fans!
(Probably the most detailed comparison review on the net!)
This review is in a semi-question-and-answer format
It involves a lot of personal opinions, supplemented by objective data. Therefore, the content of the evaluation is highly subjective and represents only personal opinions. If you have different opinions, please feel free to discuss them in the comments section.
OPPO Watch 2 ECG
Description of the content
For the convenience of calling the following:
"OPPO Watch 2 ECG version" is referred to as "OW2"
"Huawei Watch 3" is referred to as "HW3"
The content of the experience is limited to the following conditions:
The content is limited to the following conditions. p> OW2 firmware version: OW20W3 11 A.51 d784fa8b
OPPO Health app version: 3.9.8 c02f8db 211109
HW3 firmware version: 2.0.0.198
Huawei Sports Health version: 12.0.10.310
Test date: November 2021
Super long article, if you want to read it selectively, eat your own table of contents:
① Preface
② Thoughts on the appearance of OW2?
③ What does OW2 do better than HW3?
④ What does OW2 do less well than HW3?
⑤ What affects the experience?
⑤ What affects the experience? (and suggestions)
⑥ Overall evaluation of OW2 and suggestions for purchase?
⑦ What are Light Rock's thoughts on the smart wearable industry?
First of all, the conclusion: compared to the appearance of the HW3, the OW2 is a complete failure
If you want to see the unboxing and the actual pictures, you can poke this: check out the link
Let's talk about why the OW2 is a complete failure?
Instead of the appearance of HW3 and OW2, it is more like the square and circle of smartwatch, in fact, it is a matter of each flower into each eye, very subjective, like the salty and sweet of bean curd brain, there is no standard answer.
As for my personal opinion, I'm going to use my previous review of the HW3
(check the link) to output my viewpoints:
Huawei HW3
I personally agree with the circular dial for the following reasons:
Although the rectangular dial has a greater amount of access to information, I don't believe that the watch side of the device needs to have access to a large amount of information, it needs to have access to key information.
Although the rectangular dial has more information access, I don't think the watch side is a device that needs a lot of information access, what it needs is access to key information, so I personally don't think that this advantage is enough to support its shape;
I think the round dial is better looking, closer to the traditional wristwatch, with more decorative attributes, while also diminishing the excessive technological sense of the square watch and sense of dissonance, and a more non-intrusive design that can be adapted to more formal and informal occasions;
As Apple Watch is really too successful, the market recognition is very high, one branch.
Because Apple Watch is so successful, the market recognition is very high, and it has become a dominant brand. Although "square" and "round" are both basic graphics, smartwatches that are made in a square shape, objectively more or less give people the feeling of "imitating" Apple, including OW2;
To sum up, in terms of the two different dial shapes of the watch, I personally prefer the round dial design of HW3. Appearance was also one of the biggest factors that led me to buy the HW3. After all, as a wearable product, decoration is still an important dimension to consider.
Of course, the fact that I'm going to get the OW2 proves that while I prefer round dials on both, I certainly don't dislike square dials.
Among all the square dial products, OW2 is relatively "unique" in its design and details, such as the hyperbolic design, which improves the feel of the operation, but also enhances the overall sophistication, and reduces the sense of clashing with the AW.
(PS: Those of you familiar with Light Rock should know that I personally have always been a big fan of hyperbolic surfaces, including cell phones.)
Especially the ECG cardio version of the OW2, the overall texture will be a few levels higher than the ordinary version, for the entire product line is the only version of the "316L stainless steel" body, "ceramic" back shell and "sapphire glass" photoelectricity sensing element cover, the overall texture is still very outstanding, the use of this point of the material and the HW3 and the HW3 is the same, the two can be bye bye, the good or bad, depending on the person who is familiar with the light rock students should know that I personally always advocate dual surface, including AW. The texture of the watch is one of the best smartwatches on the market.
OW2 Showcase
First, the interaction experience
This is the most obvious perception of the switch from HW3 to OW2.
To describe the difference in perception, assuming a 10 out of 10 AW experience, OW2 would be a 7-8 out of 10, while HW3 would be in the mid to low 5's.
First of all, the overall experience of OW2 is a bit different than that of HW3.
First of all the overall smoothness on is very good, almost comparable to Apple!
Of course, it can also be said to imitate Apple. With Apple as a good teacher, OW2 this student to do a lot easier to do the subject (according to gossip that OPPO also poached AW's engineers?).
In terms of results, it's very good.
Secondly, on the dynamic effects and visual effects, HW3 for some reason, in the subsequent system update, canceled a lot of dynamic effects and visual effects, such as notification animation, background blurring and excessive animation, etc., may be in order to renew the life, it is surprising.
And on the OW2 can be said to be the amount of pipe! Objectively speaking is currently non-Apple smartwatch, do the best product (perhaps not one).
Apple watch said a face question mark
Second, the ecological construction
Again, the ecological construction, this is the current non-Apple system of all smart watches, a "bottleneck" and eternal pain. More than anything else, all hardware manufacturers can't get around the topic, and this is something that the two companies can't do satisfactorily.
At this stage, OW2 has a total of 64 apps on the shelf, but of course this figure is somewhat watered down, as the thieving OPPO puts some of its system apps on the app market as well. The third-party apps are around 50 or so.
All the apps currently on the OW store
You might ask: Huh? Not right ah, so see there is no advantage over the HW3 experience ah, the light of the number of words say not as much as Huawei is still more it?
The reason why the OW2 ecosystem is better is mainly reflected in 2 aspects:
The first aspect is that the OW2 apps "quality" and "independence" is higher.
Take Baidu Maps for example:
The storage size of Baidu Maps downloaded from HW3 store is less than 1M, while the one downloaded from OPPO watch store reaches 44M! The difference in functionality is reflected in the fact that most of the apps, including Baidu Maps, on HW3 are still unable to detach themselves from the cell phone, and their functions are also relatively simple. The HW3 is more of a "applet" than an app, and is more suited to RTOS systems like the GT 2PRO, such as the recent Amzfit RTOS device, which does not reflect the hardware advantage of the HW3.
And Huawei's proud Hongmeng distributed capability, which is supported by the fact that OW and AW are equally supported, supports the casting of key information from the phone to the watch screen, such as navigation, taxi and flights, and other key information.
Not to mention 'national apps' like QQ, WeChat and music, which Huawei doesn't have at the moment (though it's reportedly already in talks, wait for HW4).
But it should be noted that, in fact, I don't think it's wise to do the work on the watch that can be easily done on the phone, and its real significance may be to cover the occasional scene of independent use, even if the use of the scene only accounts for 1/10 of the total scene, such as the phone is out of battery, or go out to exercise, etc., so you can not bring the phone, and use the watch alone to maintain a basic connection with the outside world.
But the fact is, the watch is not the only one that can be used.
But the fact is that the AOSP-based Hongmeng Watch has the ability to do standalone apps (refer to third-party ADB app installations), and with the hardware base there, you can look forward to subsequent updates, with the only constraints being longevity and advancement (which I obviously can't afford to wait for).
The second aspect is that the OW2 is much more "third-party" extensible. Thanks to the credit of the magic change Android, do not have to like HW3 as the top of the Hongmeng hat to avoid (pollen do not spray me, this is the Huawei engineers microblogging their own words), coupled with the different from the HW3 for the round screen, the OW2 adaption to be much simpler. You can ADB install some apps that are not in the official app market, such as: Coolan, B station, Jieyin and so on.
For example, the third-party application market, Etralab
Third, the information display
This point does not need to be said, whether it is the density of the information display, layout, etc., the square dial of OW3 has a greater advantage.
Round dial, on the other hand, can almost only show key information in the drama.
But that doesn't matter much at the level of message notifications and so on - as I said earlier, watches don't need to receive and process complex information.
It's possible that in terms of app adaptation and user habits it will be relatively more continuous with the phone, and more universal. At the same time, the neat layout also helps to quickly access information.
Fourth, battery life and charging
"Full intelligence can be used for 4 days"
"Charge for 10 minutes, use for a whole day"
These two Slogans are the important publicity selling point of OW2.
I verified this, and the first thing is that the 4 days of battery life in Full Intelligence mode is! The first is that the full intelligent mode lasts for 4 days! It's basically 3.5-4 days
The HW3's previous launch was advertised as 4 days (later changed to 3 days on the promo page), but the actual usage was just over 2 days. I was expecting the OW2 to be 'false' as well, but the actual test results were 4 days according to my previous HW3 usage model!
This is mainly due to the OW2's larger 510mAh battery (60mAh more than the HW3) and its advertised "dual-engine battery life", which is described in detail in the manufacturer's launch video and review, so I won't go into that. In short, the result is the current top level of battery life of all smartwatches, and I'm responsible for that statement.
Fast charging
Then there's charging, and after being tormented by the HW3, the OW2's charging speed is like a "tortoise and hare race" in comparison.
The HW3 takes about 90 to 120 minutes to fully charge, depending on the room temperature, and the OW2 takes about 40 to 60 minutes, which is basically half the time of the HW3, if not less.
The reason for this, as I mentioned in my previous in-depth test of the HW3, is the trade-off between "wired" and "wireless" charging from different vendors. Due to the size constraints of the watch, the heat dissipation is poor, and wireless charging can't do much with the power, resulting in the charging time of all the products that use wireless charging including the HW3 being not short.
On the other hand, the contact wired charging similar to Omni is not as "high class", and not as universal as wireless, and may even have contact oxidation problems later, but it is able to do it "fast" and "very fast".
I personally agree with this trade-off, and the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
HW3
Overall, long battery life + fast charging is the best way to reduce battery life anxiety without a breakthrough in battery development, and I agree with OPPO's pragmatic thinking.
V. Cost-effective
This point should not have been put into the said, after all, different people have different definitions of "cost-effective". Even HW3, I do not think he is like many people say, how expensive, how to cut leeks, demand definition of value, which is the result of natural competition in the market, no good or bad.
It's just that in comparison, OW2's price/performance ratio is really quite high, even for the ECG version, the third-party platform only requires 2K out of the box. Comprehensive product power, this price is relatively speaking still relatively conscientious, I can see that the green factory still want to share a piece of the wearable market cake.
Six, the device open
Although generally the same brand within the product ecological combination of the best adaptation.
But Huawei is still doing a little too much, artificial manufacturing equipment barriers quite a lot, used Huawei wear products should know, Huawei wear for non-Huawei phone support is very unfriendly! Especially iPhone users, not only the general function can not be used, the range is also directly reduced by half.
A lot of core features and selling points will be missing, including but not limited to: cross-screen delivery of information, heart health research, sleep and breathing screening, and one-touch transmission, etc. See the table below for details.
HW3's limitations on non-Huawei phones
The OW2 side of the equation is much better, although there are still some features that rely on Color OS, such as Gaming Mode and Remote Photo. But in general, they are all irrelevant non-core features that don't affect the core experience.
In fact, I don't see the point of Huawei's semi-closed policy based on only having a stockpile of devices and not too many new ones.
VII. Maintenance Outlook
This point should start from my journey of HW3, from the first purchase to now want to sell, HW3 let me from the beginning of the "understanding" into "do not understand", there is a saying that is: "the courage to admit the wrong, the death of the heart does not change"
In the use of the HW3 during my Huawei engineers on-line, phone communication countless times, I can feel that they want to do a good job, the attitude of sincerity. I can feel that they want to do a good job and have a sincere attitude, but one week, two weeks, one month, two months, I just can't wait any longer. Even in the communication, the internal staff also revealed the contradictions and lack of confidence in this product.
Face value is really high
In contrast, OW3 has a good product base, and in general, unlike Huawei's "defending party" in the wearable market, OPPO belongs to the "attacking party" will be relatively speaking more proactive, and the pressure on profitability in the short term should not be so great.
For example, @Lubia, a product manager at Coolan, is always available to communicate with and listen to users, and Huawei lacks a more direct vertical feedback channel, which is a bit arrogant overall.
But here's the thing: non-OPPO users don't seem to be able to use the OPPO Community app, so how can they give feedback?
Eight, other details
Automatic exercise records, pause to do a lot more sensitive than Huawei, Huawei in addition to the time threshold and heart rate parameter threshold, it is difficult to trigger.
There are also non-family brand link stability than the HW3. Because Huawei needs to install HMS, while maintaining two background stability to be a little worse. Including the power consumption of HMS should not be underestimated.
Furthermore, most of the advanced operations on the HW3 need to be done on the phone, such as sleep result viewing, probably due to the screen form factor. That's not a huge impact overall, but for some people it's objectively one less step to interact with.
OW2's voice assistant is also much stronger than HW3's Xiaoyi, mainly in terms of being easier to wake up, and more powerful, basically close to Boo on the phone.
The front said so much of the OW2 "good", naturally, there are also do not do enough places, as once the king of the wearable market Huawei, HW3 in the following levels are still better than OW2 at present.
First, the big health
"Health" as a smart wearable product "unique skills", is not close to the phone can not do, so the performance of health in the smartwatch has become very important. At this point, thanks to Huawei's many years of data and ecological accumulation, it can be said that the domestic manufacturers are riding high.
In fact, the hardware level is not bad at all, after all this is PPG, ECG, blood oxygen and some gravity sensing acceleration sensors. The accuracy of the test can also be achieved long ago more than 95%, the difference of 1%, 2% is not very meaningful, such as ECG ECG hardware and software everyone is good Lowe's offer. HW3 on more "Schr?dinger" temperature monitoring.
OW2 is mainly missing or for the processing and analysis of the collected information is not as good as Huawei, in the smart wear "software and hardware integration" is very important.
So how does Huawei differentiate itself from its friends?
The answer is that Huawei provides a sign-reading service as if you went to the temple and shook a sign, as for this sign is a sign or a sign needs to be asked to interpret the sign, if the interpretation of the sign is the next need to be someone to give you guidance, and Huawei provides a "sign-reading" program:
Scientific sleep analysis, apnea screening;
Heart health research and analysis of the heart, the heart, the heart, the heart.
Heart Health Study;
Vascular Health Study;
Respiratory Disease Screening (OTA pending);
and soon to be released:
Coronary Heart Disease Screening Study;
Hypertension Screening Study.
These health research projects with top medical institutions or colleges in China are very relevant, providing a "reading" of the test results, and even offering one-stop services such as medical appointments and return visits. It is very helpful in screening specific high-risk groups.
Taking heart health research as an example, according to data released by Huawei: since the launch of the heart health research program, there have been more than 2.47 million users participating in the program as of March, and more than 10,000 people have been screened for high risk of arrhythmia through the program, with the accuracy of the screening reaching more than 90%. The accuracy rate is more than 90%. You don't say, I really have friends around me who have received a call back from 301 hospital customer service because of "apnea".
And OPPO side, although there are efforts in this regard, such as the introduction of the "snoring monitoring" and "heart rate warning" but the overall is still poorer meaning, such as sleep monitoring algorithm accuracy than Huawei is still not enough to accurate, oxygen monitoring trigger threshold is also too high, the interpretation of the ECG ECG and PPG rate is not as comprehensive as Huawei, etc.
The OPPO side, although there are efforts, such as the launch of the "snoring monitoring" and "heart rate warning" but overall is still poorer meaning.
Not only that, OPPO in the "big health hardware ecological" construction is far less rich than Huawei, ecological hardware only a few. Huawei after years of development, relatively already very rich, can choose a very large margin: for example, the recently released ECG strap, convenient blood glucose meter, etc.
Huawei's hardware ecosystem is far less rich than that of OPPO.
Huawei's big health eco-hardware has an overwhelming advantage
Lastly, the ECG on the OW2 doesn't seem to be certified as a Class 2 medical device like the first generation, and it's not clear whether that's because it's in the process of being certified yet, or because it's not certified at all. Ask @Lubia.
Second, the motion experience
It's not that the OW2's motion monitoring isn't allowed, on the contrary, the OW2's automatic motion recognition and pause is much better than Huawei's. You can see that the underlying algorithms aren't bad. You can see that the underlying algorithm is not bad. What I'm saying here is mainly about the 'experience'.
Overall, there is still a certain lack of functionality and details:
For example, Huawei watch can do when the watch is connected to the phone, the two work together The cell phone starts to exercise automatically synchronized to the watch to start recording heart rate, and vice versa, the watch starts to exercise automatically synchronized to the phone routes and other information in real time to see, which is not possible with OPPO.
Secondly, the data recorded by the movement, relative to Huawei will be more detailed and intuitive. And more data is provided on the watch, which will be mentioned again in the client experience later.
Huawei also has a real-time dynamic line record on the watch side, as well as a dynamic track video on the cell phone side, and most importantly, there are a lot of sports and fitness courses accumulated over the years.
Third, the hardware performance
Overall,
OW2's 4100 + Apollo4s + 1GRAM + 8GROM hardware configuration and HW3's Kirin 710L + Kirin A1 + 2GRAM + 16GROM, half a catty at the processor level, there is not much difference. It's about equal to the performance level of flagships from seven or eight years ago.
But OW2 is still not sincere enough in terms of memory and RAM, for example, 1G of RAM, when opening apps in the foreground, it often leads to a situation where the background is killed, including the background of instant messaging software.
Furthermore, the 8G storage is not generous for practical use, and for such a feature-rich watch, this storage is more or less stretched. This memory and storage limitation may affect the subsequent upgrades and use of this watch during its lifecycle.
This is where Huawei and Apple have been quite generous, bumping up the specs to near-phone levels. But although Huawei is generous, but the shortcomings in the ecological, more or less empty a skill nowhere to show the flavor.
Fourth, the client app experience
It should be noted that this part is more subjective, only as a reference. OPPO's recent update of the health app client in general is still a significant improvement, but comprehensively speaking, and Huawei's client there is still a certain experience gap.
From the interface
Let's start with the home page. The layout of the two is largely the same. But the focus and direct access to the functions of the OPPO health app is not as good as Huawei.
The sports interface, OPPO Health is too simple, and can even be said to be simple. Huawei Sports Health app has numerous courses, and all of them are of good quality, fully comparable to third-party professional apps, most of which are free courses in the early stages, and most recently seem to have opened up a membership system, but the fees are not too high.
In terms of user experience
OPPO lacks 'user incentives'
In the case of dynamic video tracks, for example, it's not just about recording, it's also about social sharing. I often see those who run a few kilometers a day on the circle of friends of the sportsman race dynamic video, because the nature of the movement is "anti-human nature", need to "show off" and "vanity" to motivate.
Huawei has done a great job of incentivizing users, for example, the "medals" are richer and more textured than OPPO. And it also organizes regular monthly sports activities to achieve certain achievements through sports. From time to time, small words will pop up to encourage you or spur you on, so that you feel a sense of communication with the device.
Huawei's Dynamic Tracks video
Looking at the data.
Viewing data and charts within the interface, the OW2 is basically only a rough view, not even dragging the time slider, while Huawei not only allows you to view charts in full screen, but also overlay charts, as well as dragging the time node slider.
Huawei's is relatively more intuitive in terms of how it displays data like heart rate, oxygen, sleep, etc. OPPO "borrows" from AW, but in a somewhat abstract way.
Finally, as mentioned earlier, because OPPO's health ecological hardware circle is just beginning, it also lacks Huawei's ability to access a variety of ecological hardware.
Fifth, IOT ecological framework
In fact, the smart watch as a personal device, was very suitable as a control terminal, but helpless OPPO's smart home appliance ecological do not do as well as expected, intelligent curve save the country through the Tmall Genie to control, but this does bring integration and experience depth is seriously inadequate.
Give a scenario example: when I look at the TV in bed, inadvertently fall asleep, this time the smart watch monitor I fall asleep after a certain period of time will automatically help me to turn off the lights, turn off the TV, after all, the light noise affects sleep. This is the smart wearable personalized attributes to bring control of the smart home combined case.
Six, other details
AOD needless to say, want to make the table look more like a table, this point is essential, although it will affect the range, but in some occasions a dark screen watch still looks stupid, but I heard that it has been done.
The sedentary reminder is not as sensitive as the HW3, which often doesn't remind me when I've been sitting for hours. There also doesn't seem to be a hand washing reminder. The sleep monitor will occasionally lose data.
Furthermore, there is a lack of peripheral products for the watch, as the OW2 is a customized interface, the third-party accessory straps are far inferior to the HW3, which has a 22mm universal strap, and even a reliable adapter for 22mm straps is hard to come by.
Finally the dial market this piece, OW2 lacks, basically the official dial, the benefit is naturally free, and there is a basic guarantee of quality.
But the lack of third-party developers, the number of dials and creativity is still poor. I hope to open up third-party development tools to create a dial market ecosystem.
First, Children WeChat experience
The logic of this Children WeChat to accept messages is a bit BUG, for example, we disconnect our phone and watch, but my phone is still in use and can see the messages, wait until I go to the watch to open the WeChat, it will push all the messages of WeChat after the disconnection on the one side again, and the header image is separate and horizontal jump ... ...
Another one is that in some scenarios, there will be notes from children's WeChat, and the shame is overwhelming, right?
The last one is that after logging into WeChat on a computer, if you turn on the phone mute and wait for the computer to go offline, it will naturally remain mute BUG, and here again we have to kindly greet Mr. Zhang Xiaolong.
Children's WeChat can only be an excessive program in the end, see when Zhang Xiao got the hang of it and came out with a proper watch version.
Second, OPPO health details
This point is still the problem mentioned earlier, to create a "sports health closed loop", will be "courses", "user incentives" and so on to improve.
Third, the interface interaction level details
This application list interface, how do I feel it HW3 and OW2 interface swap will be more perfect?
One is a square list tucked inside a round table!
One is a round list stuffed into a square list!
Don't you think it's a waste to waste four corners like that on a smartwatch inch screen? Besides, the OW2 doesn't have the rotating crown of the HW3, which doesn't make it pleasant to use.
When it comes to the app interface, everything else borrows from the logic of the phone, but only the uninstallation of apps, you need to tap into the list of apps, struggle to find the app market, and then find the sub-menu and then uninstall.
Why can't we borrow the logic of the phone, long press the icon, in addition to moving the location, in the four empty corners show a trash can label, directly drag to the corner to confirm the uninstallation.
It is recommended to refer to Samsung and Huawei to add "gesture operation" to the watch, such as rubbing the finger to open the payment code, shaking the fist to answer the phone and so on.
The reason is that in the use of smartwatch scenarios, there is no guarantee that it can be operated with both hands. If you need to adjust the hand posture to achieve, it would be better to open the hand directly to let go of the convenience. (For example, I'm eating crayfish.)
Yup, that's a whole lot of talk, so for me personally,
How is the OPPO Watch 2 ECG version?
Overall, my overall experience with OW2 is still mostly positive, and in comparison with HW3, I can't simply say who's better and who's worse, but overall, in terms of ecological construction, health and algorithmic resources that need to be invested in the long term, the OW2 is still slightly inferior.
In terms of the basic experience of the watch, user understanding and ecological construction, the degree of completion is higher compared to HW3.
My personal opinion is: OW2 can cover more user groups and needs, but also more intelligent, for this product is still more satisfied, can give 8/10.
It is said that the Android world's "fully intelligent watch" is a pit,
so much so that Huawei released the second generation of Watch after four years,
so much so that even with a strong fan appeal, Xiaomi Watch has also suffered a sales setback.
So much so that major manufacturers have repeatedly and painfully jumped between Wear OS, Magic Android, and homegrown systems, and even the app ecosystem needs to be talked about one by one.
I have only one expectation for OPPO Watch, including other manufacturers: hold on, the road is dangerous and long. I believe that now is the darkness before the dawn, and with the growing importance of healthy living, the explosion will always come.
As for buying advice
I think OW2 may not be particularly suitable for those professional sports users and those who have certain expectations for smart ecology.
If you are particularly demanding about the value of the watch, and don't like the square watch form at all, then you don't have to consider it at all.
It should be more suitable for geeks, white-collar workers and students who are young people who like to make a fuss, want to get rid of battery life anxiety to a certain extent, and want a smart terminal to share some of the anxiety of the phone. In this, OW2 has a very strong competitiveness, I personally recommend.
Has the wearable industry entered a bottleneck?
Some people say yes, because the homogenization of the hardware and software on the market is becoming more and more serious, and all of them are making up for their shortcomings and learning from each other.
And for the user, it seems that smart wearable products have become dispensable, there is no strong demand to stimulate the purchase, even even if it is as strong as AW, daily use of 80% of the needs of a small bracelet can also do.
But I personally remain optimistic that the bottleneck of smart wearable is still far from being reached, and may even still be at the bottom of the bottle, the depth and breadth that can be excavated are still very much there. Not because of weak demand and lack of investment, it is precisely not enough to do, which leads to weak demand, do not reverse cause and effect.
In terms of depth
Take the smartwatch as an example, notification, sports, health and intelligence, these 4 carriages, have not yet ridden.
Health level of the use of existing sensors and algorithm optimization are not enough, for different scenes, different user groups under the coverage is not complete. The monitoring of stability and diverse customization is also not enough. As for new sensors, even as strong as Huawei, the "respiratory health research" based on body temperature sensors has been postponed and shelved again and again. Smart wearable want to really become a personal health assistant center, there is still a way to go.
Not to mention the sports level, the accuracy of the recognition of complex sports is still a problem, don't look at OPPO Huawei claimed to have over a hundred sports, but the vast majority of them belong to the record of the heart rate of the "soy sauce project", there is absolutely no guidance and reference. Especially ball sports.
The smart level is even worse, except for Apple, the ecology of the smartwatch side is still a chicken feather. Can you imagine a series of products in the release of a year after the iteration of the product, the application ecology covers just increased a few dozen apps? Android (including Hongmeng) smartwatches are in dire need of a manufacturer alliance ecology!
From the breadth of smart wear
The current system is not yet systematic, very primary, smart wear smart watches / bracelets accounted for most of the shipments, but limited by the uniqueness of the watch category, destined for health monitoring and comfort is not a great advantage.
In the future, we can expand the breadth of smart wear, such as smart clothing, smart glasses, smart headphones, and even smart underwear. The full range of health monitoring, intelligent linkage and sports assistance.
Therefore, I am optimistic about the prospects of the smart wearable market. Mobile phones may not disappear, but the combination of human and smart needs will not only be through the cell phone, but also the need to include cell phones, smart wearable and smart home of the perfect systematic combination.
#oppowatch2#
#Huawei Watch3#
#Huawei Hongmeng#
#OPPO#
#smartwatch#
Kwangan
2021.11.14
All of the above are original.
Reproduction without permission is prohibited.
All of the above is original.
Reproduction without permission is prohibited.