Ans:
Here, I have to remind the majority of consumers, today's media is no longer in the past *** "mouthpiece", institutions, but enterprises! The media itself is a business, is to be operated, some media in order to pursue benefits is unscrupulous. Here I would also like to ask some of the media, if the Ministry of Health that "ionized water" exaggerated propaganda, then some irresponsible media is exaggerated reports, is pure "fake news", "false reports! It is pure "fake news" and "false reporting". China's beer formaldehyde storm of the impact should not cause the media to think y?
Therefore, in the news industry to carry out rectification is particularly necessary.
Third, ionized water does have better medical and health care functions.
Ionized water in the end there is no health care or medical function is the key to the problem.
Ionized water originated in Japan in the 30s of the last century, and in the early 60s, water electrolysis machines were used in clinical practice in Japan, and on October 8, 1965, the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (equivalent to the Ministry of Health of China) issued the "Pharmaceutical Drugs No. 763," which recognized water electrolysis as a "medical device" for use. Medical appliances" use, electrolyzed water began to be used in Japan's major hospitals in clinical applications, to assist in the treatment of various diseases; 1974, electrolyzed water machine manufacturing technology into the United States, and in 1978 into South Korea.
With the development of the Japanese economy, all kinds of social problems are more and more prominent, due to the pollution of drinking water sources, especially tap water sources of pollution is becoming increasingly serious, people's health awareness has gradually increased, the folk of the health of the water, clean water calls for more and more, it is due to the community of electrolysis of water this expectation, in 1978 Japan *** recognized the manufacture of In 1978, Japan *** recognized the manufacture of "continuous water electrolysis machines", which are also known as home-use water electrolysis machines. Various brands of water electrolyzers began to formally enter the market, entering thousands of homes in Japan. At present, there are nearly one hundred manufacturers of water electrolyzers in Japan, such as Panasonic, Sanyo and other famous large companies have their own brands of water electrolyzers for production and sale. According to relevant information, in Japan, the popularity of water electrolyzer in the family has reached 33%.
At present, under the auspices of the Functional Water Council of the Chinese Health Care Association, the scientific research and evaluation of ionized water and human health are being carried out in an orderly manner. Among the health care and medical functions that have been confirmed are:
-- Improvement of abnormal fermentation in the stomach and intestines
-- Improvement of dysentery
-- Improvement of constipation
-- Improvement of the health care and medical functions of ionized water. Constipation
- -Regulate blood sugar
- -Regulate blood pressure
- -Regulate blood lipids
--Anti-fatigue
--Anti-oxidation
--Improve SOD activity
Therefore, we can say with certainty that the companies selling the Therefore, we can say with certainty that it is reasonable for companies to advertise health or medical functions when selling "water ionizers". Of course, may still be in the "illegal" state. This requires that on the one hand, enterprises to comply with the law, on the other hand, the community to give some tolerance and understanding, to "ionized water" this new thing a chance to grow.
Fourth, the legal position of ionized water
Ionized water machine publicity function is reasonable and illegal, but companies want to not legal business? Not also, "ionized water" and "water ionizer" legal identity of the confirmation of the encountered legal gaps. Its encounter as "electric bicycle" dispute, caught in the end is "motorized" or "non-motorized" vortex. Whether consumers buy or merchants sell "ionized water" health or medical functions. However, "ionized water" only meets the "drinking water" standard, because there is no "functional factors" and "compatibility", does not meet the health food or pharmaceutical products.
This is the first time I've seen an ionized water product in the world.
Therefore, "ionized water" can only be drinking water with health care or medical functions, and only "Chinese" can speak English, not "British" speak English. Therefore, the legal application of ionized water can only be "drinking water" regulations to manage, but not according to health food or pharmaceutical regulations to manage.
Of course, as a device, following the "water ionizer" recognized by the Ministry of Health as a "water-related products", the State Food and Drug Administration will be "water ionizer" The State Food and Drug Administration has listed the national class II medical device certification category, which gives the "water ionizer" production enterprises some comfort.
Second, the legal application of ionized water
Ionized water is drinking water with health care or medical functions. It is this short seventeen words, many people can not understand or
that can not be correctly understood, and therefore there are differences in the application of the law. I think, to correctly understand the ionized water, must accurately distinguish between three pairs of concepts:
First, the function of the water and the difference between functional water. Ionized water is a functional water. The so-called functional water is to speak: the water itself is functional, through a certain technology to deal with the water itself, the function of the water itself to enhance, this water is called functional water. In other words: functional water is still water, but the water itself has improved its function. The health care or medical function shown by functional water is originally the function of water, only the degree of performance is different. The analogy is: people, everyone is a human being, the ability of those who have been to school and those who have not been to school are not the same quality. But we can't say that people who have studied for a PhD are no longer human beings if their abilities have improved, and they have become gods.
Second, there is a difference between medical treatment and health care. Many people believe that: ionized water can cure is medicinal water, it must be in accordance with the "medicine" and medical regulations to manage. Do not know, medicine can cure, but the cure is not all medicine. For example, acupuncture, such as the Beijing Evening News on June 17, 2005, there is a message, "practicing Tai Chi to lower blood pressure," practicing Tai Chi is medicine? Does it need approval? Is it illegal to publicize it? Similarly, the ionized water can cure belongs to the health method rather than a medical method.
Third, health food and food health is different. I believe that ionized water can be health care, but does not belong to the category of health food, belongs to the category of food health care. This is like saying: jujube is food, but has health care functions, and the sale of its health care function is not illegal. Otherwise, every day to publicize its health newspapers, magazines and related news every day in the illegal.
Therefore, in a general sense, the ionized water publicity health and medical function is not illegal. The key to illegal or not is whether there is a "basis", and the difficulty is whether to direct basis.
The author believes that: due to the ionized water or water, although it has health care and medical effects, but ionized water is still water, that is, not to do health care products, but also not to do drugs. Therefore, the health care or medical function of ionized water can be indirectly based on, and do not need a direct basis. In other words, as in the case of food health care, the efficacy of its publicity need to be indirect basis can be, and do not need to be like health care products or medicines must be a direct basis.
Also, I think it's better to drink water from a water dispenser, I have friends who drink this.
Here, I have to remind the majority of consumers, today's media is not the past *** "mouthpiece", institutions, but enterprises! The media itself is a business, is to be operated, some media in order to pursue the benefits are unscrupulous. Here I would also like to ask some of the media, if the Ministry of Health that "ionized water" exaggerated propaganda, then some irresponsible media is exaggerated reports, is pure "fake news", "false reports! It's pure "fake news" and "false reporting". China's beer formaldehyde storm of the impact should not cause the media to think y?
Therefore, in the news industry to carry out rectification is particularly necessary.
Third, ionized water does have better medical and health care functions.
Ionized water in the end there is no health care or medical function is the key to the problem.
Ionized water originated in Japan in the 30s of the last century, and in the early 60s, water electrolysis machines were used in clinical practice in Japan, and on October 8, 1965, the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (equivalent to the Ministry of Health of China) issued the "Pharmaceutical Drugs No. 763", which recognized the use of electrolysis as a "medical appliance". Medical appliances" use, electrolyzed water began to be used in Japan's major hospitals in clinical applications, to assist in the treatment of various diseases; 1974, electrolyzed water machine manufacturing technology into the United States, and in 1978 into South Korea.
With the development of the Japanese economy, all kinds of social problems are more and more prominent, due to the pollution of drinking water sources, especially tap water sources of pollution is becoming increasingly serious, people's health awareness has gradually increased, the folk of the health of the water, clean water calls for more and more, it is due to the community of electrolysis of water this expectation, in 1978 Japan *** recognized the manufacture of In 1978, Japan *** recognized the manufacture of "continuous water electrolysis machines", which are also known as home-use water electrolysis machines. Various brands of water electrolyzers began to formally enter the market, entering thousands of homes in Japan. At present, there are nearly one hundred manufacturers of water electrolyzers in Japan, such as Panasonic, Sanyo and other famous large companies have their own brands of water electrolyzers for production and sale. According to relevant information, in Japan, the popularity of water electrolyzer in the family has reached 33%.
At present, under the auspices of the Functional Water Council of the Chinese Health Care Association, the scientific research and evaluation of ionized water and human health are being carried out in an orderly manner. Among the health care and medical functions that have been confirmed are:
-- Improvement of abnormal fermentation in the stomach and intestines
-- Improvement of dysentery
-- Improvement of constipation
-- Improvement of the quality of the water. Constipation
- -Regulate blood sugar
- -Regulate blood pressure
- -Regulate blood lipids
--Anti-fatigue
--Anti-oxidation
--Improve SOD activity
Therefore, we can say with certainty that the companies selling the Therefore, we can say with certainty that it is reasonable for companies to advertise health or medical functions when selling "water ionizers". Of course, may still be in the "illegal" state. This requires that on the one hand, enterprises to comply with the law, on the other hand, the community to give some tolerance and understanding, to "ionized water" this new thing a chance to grow.
Fourth, the legal position of the ionized water
Ionized water machine publicity function is reasonable and illegal, but companies want to not legal business? Not also, "ionized water" and "water ionizer" legal identity of the confirmation of the encountered legal gaps. Its encounter as "electric bicycle" dispute, caught in the end is "motorized" or "non-motorized" vortex. Whether consumers buy or merchants sell "ionized water" health or medical functions. However, "ionized water" only meets the "drinking water" standard, because there is no "functional factors" and "compatibility", does not meet the health food or pharmaceutical products.
This is the first time I've seen an ionized water product in the world.
Therefore, "ionized water" can only be drinking water with health care or medical functions, and only "Chinese" can speak English, not "British" speak English. Therefore, the legal application of ionized water can only be "drinking water" regulations to manage, but not according to health food or pharmaceutical regulations to manage.
Of course, as a device, following the "water ionizer" recognized by the Ministry of Health as a "water-related products", the State Food and Drug Administration will be "water ionizer" The State Food and Drug Administration has listed the national class II medical device certification category, which gives the "water ionizer" production enterprises some comfort.
Second, the legal application of ionized water
Ionized water is drinking water with health care or medical functions. It is this short seventeen words, many people can not understand or
that can not be correctly understood, and therefore there are differences in the application of the law. I think, to correctly understand the ionized water, must accurately distinguish between three pairs of concepts:
First, the function of the water and the difference between functional water. Ionized water is a functional water. The so-called functional water is to speak: the water itself is functional, through a certain technology to deal with the water itself, the function of the water itself to enhance, this water is called functional water. In other words: functional water is still water, but the water itself has improved its function. The health care or medical function shown by functional water is originally the function of water, only the degree of performance is different. The image of the analogy is: people, everyone is a human being, and the ability and quality of those who have been to school and those who have not been to school are not the same. But we can't say that people who have studied for a PhD are no longer human beings if their abilities have improved, and they have become gods.
Second, there is a difference between medical treatment and health care. Many people believe that: ionized water can cure is medicinal water, it must be in accordance with the "medicine" and medical regulations to manage. Do not know, medicine can cure, but the cure is not all medicine. For example, acupuncture, such as the Beijing Evening News on June 17, 2005, there is a message, "practicing Tai Chi to lower blood pressure," practicing Tai Chi is medicine? Does it need approval? Is it illegal to publicize it? Similarly, the ionized water can cure belongs to the health method and not a medical method.
Third, health food and food health is different. I believe that ionized water can be health care, but does not belong to the category of health food, belongs to the category of food health care. This is like saying: jujube is food, but has health care functions, and the sale of its health care function is not illegal. Otherwise, every day to publicize its health newspapers, magazines and related news every day in the illegal.
Therefore, in a general sense, the ionized water publicity health and medical function is not illegal. The key to illegal or not is whether there is a "basis", and the difficulty is whether to direct basis.
The author believes that: due to ionized water or water, despite its health and medical effects, but ionized water is still water, that is, not to do health care products, but also not to do drugs. Therefore, the health care or medical function of ionized water can be indirectly based on, and do not need a direct basis. In other words, as in the case of food health care, the efficacy of its publicity need to be indirect basis can be, and do not need to be like health care products or medicines must be a direct basis.
Also, I think it's better to drink water from a water dispenser, and I have friends who drink this.