Ukraine's degree of bowing down to the United States has reached a new high, according to the media on December 23, not long after the U.S. demanded the removal of Huawei equipment, Ukraine began to formally issue an order plan to implement the U.S. directive.
It is understood that several other office buildings in Ukraine will also remove all Huawei equipment. At the same time, U.S. officials also said that the Ukrainian government favors U.S. telecom operators and prefers to work with the U.S. on related projects. Earlier in the day, the Ukrainian prime minister said on social media that Ukraine had chosen to cooperate with the U.S. on the network program. He posted something along the lines of saying that Ukraine will strongly support the new U.S. cyber program, strengthen cooperation with the U.S. on privacy and sensitive information, and will be a trusted partner for countries in the international community.
It is reported that Ukraine chose to cooperate with the U.S. cyber program, launched in early August 2020, the U.S. intention is not its proposal to make the network more secure, reliable, but rather to use this program to form a barrier to Chinese technology, to maintain its international status. The U.S. has long lobbied countries with this program to refuse to use Chinese communications equipment to develop 5G networks.
August 2019, Huawei opened a branch in Ukraine has announced news, has won the bid in a subway project in Ukraine, the news also pointed out that the project in Ukraine can not be communicated, Huawei won the bid for the project to refresh the scale of the previous project, in the Central and Eastern Europe and other regions are the largest communications project.
June 30, 2020, China's Huawei and ZTE were blacklisted by the U.S. Federal Communications Agency, and telecom carriers are prohibited from making purchases from the two U.S.-listed Chinese companies. In other words, the U.S. carriers in question are not allowed to purchase network equipment from Huawei and ZTE through government-subsidized funds.
The reason is that the two companies pose a threat to US national security. In response to this matter, China's foreign ministry has repeatedly expressed its opposition to this kind of groundless speculation, the United States to non-existent evidence to sanction a particular company and a particular country, the United States so obsessed with the practice of the United States is also contrary to their own advocacy of the principle of China here once again to the United States to oppose, put down on China's intentional suppression of Chinese companies can be in the United States to have a non-discriminatory market environment.