Lowest bid evaluation method
The lowest bid evaluation method is not the "lowest bid price", but all technical and economic indicators that meet the requirements of the tender documents or have deviations are converted into amounts in advance according to the provisions of the tender documents, and accumulated in the tender offer, which can be referred to as "bid evaluation price" for short. If the "lowest bid evaluation price" is taken as the winning bidder and the requirements of the bidding documents can be met, the bid with the lowest bid price can be regarded as the winning bidder.
0 1
Scope of application:
It is applicable to the bidding of materials and equipment with general technical and performance standards, or the tenderee has no special requirements for technology and performance, or the project bidding project with simple requirements for project management, and the project quality, construction period, technology and cost are less affected by the construction technical management plan.
The lowest bid evaluation method is usually used to evaluate the projects loaned by international financial organizations such as the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank.
02
Advantages:
● It can save funds to a great extent, which is conducive to cost control and improve the efficiency of capital use.
● Curb corruption and standardize market behavior.
● It is beneficial for enterprises to enter the international market.
03
Disadvantages:
The lowest price does not guarantee the best service and quality.
● Bidding suppliers have a sense of crisis. The risk is too great, and suppliers will be worried.
● The requirements for the judges are relatively high, which is time-consuming and laborious.
Comprehensive evaluation method
Convert the various qualifications, technology, business, service and other terms of the tenderer into a certain score, with a total score of 100. The bid evaluation committee determines the relative weight (i.e. "score") of each bid document according to the bid evaluation criteria, and the top three candidates with the highest comprehensive score are the winning bidders, which are recommended to the tenderee after being audited by the bid evaluation committee.
0 1
Scope of application:
It is suitable for information projects with high technical requirements, design, exploration and supervision bidding projects with high implementation scheme requirements, key equipment bidding projects with high equipment parameters, and engineering bidding projects with large construction scale, long performance period, complex technology and high engineering management requirements.
02
Advantages:
● By introducing the concept of weight, the bid evaluation results are more scientific and convincing.
● It is beneficial to play the role of bid evaluation experts, and the judges can easily "score" against the standards.
● Effectively prevent unfair competition at low prices.
03
Disadvantages:
● It is difficult to define the bid evaluation factors and weights reasonably, and the bidding methods and standards may be varied and difficult to unify and standardize.
● There may be such a phenomenon. The scores of several bidders are very close, maybe a few points, but the rankings are different in several places.
● Giving the judges more power, the "discretion" of the members of the bid evaluation committee is easy to be too large, which may lead to "people-oriented".
In addition, there are various bid evaluation methods, such as cost-effective method, lowest bid evaluation method, double envelope bid evaluation method, two-stage bid evaluation method, cost-effective method, close to pre-tender estimate method and so on.
For more information about project/service/procurement bidding, and to improve the winning rate, please click on the bottom of official website Customer Service for free consultation:/#/? source=bdzd