As far as treatment is concerned, foreign companies are of course the best. 1994, my salary in a listed company in Guangxi was about 12000 yuan per year. Later, in an electric power engineering company in Hubei, if you don't travel at the headquarters, the salary is about 18000 yuan per year, but the welfare is relatively high. My personal account for pension insurance, provident fund and medical treatment is about 5000 yuan per year. If it is on the construction site, it will probably double (3000 ~ 4000 yuan/month).
At present, the salary in foreign companies is about 800-65438+10,000 yuan per year. There are also endowment insurance and provident fund, commercial medical insurance and overall medical insurance. Overtime pay is three times as much as usual. "Four insurances and one gold" is about three times the average level in Wuhan.
When I was in Chutian Laser, my monthly salary was 1500, and after probation, it was 1800.
Only officials of state-owned enterprises can sleep in soft sleeper by plane, private enterprises can sleep in soft sleeper by plane as long as the boss agrees, and everyone in foreign enterprises can sleep in soft sleeper by plane. Officials of state-owned enterprises can be divided into big houses, ordinary people into small houses, and young people have no houses. Private enterprises and foreign companies don't have houses, but the leadership and some backbones of Chutian Laser are divided into houses. State-owned enterprises share fruit and oil on holidays (people who purchase these things will inevitably get kickbacks), while foreign enterprises rarely share them, but they have year-end awards (1-20,000).
Second, the intensity of work.
The most tiring is private enterprises, and the most relaxed is state-owned enterprises. I have held technical positions (technician, project specialist), secretary to the general manager and management positions in state-owned enterprises (by the way, I majored in mechanical manufacturing). However, working as a technical post in state-owned enterprises is very tiring, with the lowest income, many responsibilities and great pressure. But management positions are easy. Working in a private enterprise is the most tiring, uncomfortable and stressful job.
Working in a foreign company is not as tiring as I thought. Maybe European companies are more humane. It is said that Japanese-funded and Korean-funded foreign enterprises are all labor-intensive. I'm not very clear about it. I just heard about it. The nature of my job requires frequent business trips, with an average annual working time of 250 days. Almost all the rest can take vacations or arrange their own working hours. The difference between foreign companies is that everyone's position is given greater power and freedom. For example, I do after-sales service, and I want to contribute everything related to the equipment on the spot, including acceptance, equipment handling, on-site employment, equipment debugging and so on. When it comes to funding, you can generally make up your own mind and report it. This is different from most state-owned enterprises. It is difficult for state-owned enterprises to deal with funds. In state-owned enterprises and private enterprises, it is usually "a pen". There are 2000 people in my state-owned enterprise, and the boss has to sign a lot of words every day. It's really tiring. Unwilling to decentralize, this may be the biggest difference between foreign companies and private enterprises and state-owned enterprises in management.
Third, employee relations.
The relationship between employees in state-owned enterprises is the most complicated. I was recruited into the power engineering company, but most people in the power system rely on relationships or internal children, so people who are recruited into the company often do things, but if they have no relationships or are not good at dealing with interpersonal relationships, there is little chance of promotion. State-owned enterprises are too busy to play dead. When they first entered the company, they did almost everything, and workers, technicians and quality inspectors did almost everything. They are very tired. After a few years, you can ask people who come in later to do it and play by themselves, and call them apprentices. But state-owned enterprises have one advantage. No matter how bad you are, no one dares to fire you. Sometimes workers can break the leader's head in order to divide the house. The manager of our state-owned enterprise is broken because of the unfair distribution of housing.
The relationship between employees of private enterprises and foreign enterprises is simple and intrigued, but it is not as complicated as that of state-owned enterprises. The employee relationship in foreign companies is better and simpler. Organize employee family trips and parties every year. When encountering difficulties, everyone helps each other, unlike private enterprises, which take care of each other regardless of others. Private and foreign companies don't know how much their colleagues earn a month, at least they don't know the details.
Fourth, trade unions and workers' rights and interests.
Trade unions in state-owned enterprises have the strongest "strength", including trade union chairmen, office directors, women workers ministers, accounting and entertainment ministers. But they are all owners who only take money and don't do things. They all have connections to get to that position. It is impossible for such a trade union to safeguard workers' interests, and there will never be anything to negotiate with leaders to raise workers' wages. I found it funny to see that the Federation of Trade Unions asked Vuormaa to form a trade union. This is a typical state-owned enterprise thinking. Vuormaa said that we have never opposed the formation of trade unions by workers. If employees ask for it, they will definitely support it. This is the way of thinking of foreigners. In fact, the trade union law also stipulates that trade unions must be organized by workers and by bosses. Can such a trade union speak for workers? Vuormaa is actually not stupid anymore. When foreigners first arrived in China, they were not used to this China way of thinking. Later, the leaders gradually became "China experts" and adapted to China's thinking. They understand that the establishment of trade unions in China is actually to serve enterprises and coordinate the contradictions between enterprises and employees.
Most private enterprises have no trade unions. The foreign company where I work has a trade union, but there are no full-time staff. At present, trade union work is limited to going abroad once a year. It is difficult for employees of state-owned enterprises to be fired, because firing an employee has to go through a trade union congress, and even more important leaders of state-owned enterprises are afraid of getting into trouble. Private enterprises fire employees, and it is common for employees to fire private enterprises. Generally, foreign companies in Europe rarely fire employees unless they can't continue to operate or really can't adapt to the work. Most people who left our company were fired, and only one company fired him. Most employees who leave their jobs have three destinations: going abroad, starting a company and going to a better foreign company. An individual who is fired will generally notify him in advance to find a new unit and then leave.
Verb (abbreviation of verb) training.
Foreign companies with the most complete training system, but foreign companies generally do not hire a completely inexperienced graduate, and foreign companies are used to recruiting people through headhunting companies. Moreover, once you enter a foreign company, you will often enter the list of headhunting companies, especially well-known foreign companies, and almost everyone will receive a phone call from the headhunting company. For fresh graduates, state-owned enterprises are the best training bases. It is generally difficult for students without work experience to enter foreign companies. It is said that P&G employs fresh graduates, but such companies are rare.
Don't expect to send you to study in state-owned enterprises, it is difficult to give you such indicators, which will only be left to officials and related. When I was in the company, I really wanted to have training opportunities. I remember once training leaders and studying for a month. Give me the information when you come back and let me teach myself. I still did something, which made me very popular. The best training that state-owned enterprises can give you is to do things. For example, developing a new product or a new project is something that few people in state-owned enterprises are willing to do, because there are risks and few benefits. It doesn't matter if you boldly use state-owned assets to train troops. This can be said to be your best training opportunity, and there will be no such good opportunity anywhere. I did product design independently for the first time in a state-owned enterprise, chemical project for the first time and real estate for the first time. These are very tired, and they won't go to jail if they are wrong, but the opportunity is rare. Because no matter in private enterprises or foreign companies, there will be no such good opportunity for you to try.
Private enterprises have little training.
The training of foreign companies is relatively systematic, even if you are already familiar with something, you may have to train every year. This kind of training is usually carried out within a company or a group of foreign companies, rather than sitting in a classroom.
Sixth, management.
One of the favorite words of state-owned enterprises is "managing benefits". There is nothing wrong with this sentence, but state-owned enterprises misunderstood the meaning of this sentence. State-owned enterprises understand this sentence as "managing employees to produce benefits" and even become "all employees to produce benefits". In fact, no matter how strict the management of employees is, it is impossible to directly produce benefits. The real meaning of this sentence is "management-oriented enterprises produce benefits", not "managing employees well produces benefits" In fact, most state-owned enterprises in China have been unable to compete with foreign enterprises. The profits of monopoly enterprises come from policy support, and the profits of competitive enterprises have become lower and lower. According to the self-report, the loss of state-owned enterprises in 2005 was the second highest in history. State-owned enterprises are increasingly moving towards the end of the industrial chain. This is my deep feeling about state-owned enterprises for many years. It is sad to see the present situation of state-owned enterprises in Wuhan. Even those enterprises with acceptable names, such as Wuchuan and Wu, actually only have jobs and have poor profitability. I often see that some of my projects have been subcontracted many times before they fall into Wuchuan's hands. The profit can be imagined, just to support people.
At present, there are two kinds of foreign enterprises established in China, one is an export processing factory set up by using China's cheap labor, and the other is an enterprise set up by attaching importance to the China market. Most of the latter only focus on sales and service. Such foreign companies recruit few employees in China, but the profits are considerable. As far as I know, Beijing Philips Co., Ltd. has about 100 employees and an output value of about 100 billion. As for the profit, it is much higher than the domestic related industries. There is a problem that a foreign company raises its cost by importing parts of its foreign company. I won't go into details here. If the malicious cost increase factor is deducted, the profits of foreign companies will be higher. ). Why the profits of foreign companies are so high is because of technical barriers. Foreign companies have mastered the key technology and have no choice. These technologies are not as mysterious as imagined. Many domestic private enterprises have mastered it through various means, but there are legal obstacles. Lawsuits of private enterprises infringing the patent rights of foreign companies have occurred from time to time.