Iran is now showing a very tough attitude, but if the United States implements these two measures, Iran will not be able to stand it. The US's methods in Iraq still have a great deterrent effect on Iran. Iran is also very afraid of being hit in this way. Militarily, the United States will no longer have the means to reduce military expenditures to revitalize the domestic economy.
When countries around the world are paying close attention to whether the armed forces led by the United States will use the Iranian nuclear issue as an excuse to launch a military attack on Iran, people have noticed that the United States often sends conflicting messages and sometimes threatens it. They use force and sometimes talk about diplomatic solutions; Iran's attitude is very firm, not at all like Saddam's softness and hardness back then.
The United States now has a super-powerful and dominant position, and in many cases it seems that it can do whatever it wants with confidence. This is the most basic one. "Solving the Iran problem" has great temptations for the United States in terms of geopolitical and economic interests, and it seems to have the effect of completing its "Greater Middle East Plan". The implications of "solving the Iran problem" are much "simpler" and are equivalent to The United States does not need to worry too much about the security issues of the "rear" and "flanks" politically.
If the United States really wants to attack Iran, Russia and China will never stand idly by, let alone defeat their opponents. In terms of geostrategy, if Iran is occupied, it will directly threaten Russia from Iran, and the strategy will extend directly to the hinterland of Russia. If Iran is occupied, not to mention the passive strategic resources, Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan are connected to the city, and have strong China will not allow this to happen in the strategic buffer zone.