Permanent Free Healthcare in Russia, What's the Real Deal?

It is said that the collapse of the Soviet Union, the worst political disaster of the 20th century, was a real tragedy for the Russian people. What makes this statement so true? I have no intention of verifying the ultimate source of this statement, and I also think that this statement may be more or less a bit alarmist, for a bottom of the people who are still struggling to go to school, difficult to see a doctor, difficult to housing, the suffering of the Russian people is really too far away from themselves. But to hear the authoritative media, which holds the truth of the universe in its hands, proclaim that, due to the disintegration, a democracy like Russia has now been reduced to selling its resources for a living, or else it must have been so poor after the collapse of the industrial system that it actually has to almost believe it.

Recent news reports say that the Russian government has announced the end of paid health care, and that citizens will have permanent access to free health care, with all health care included under the state guaranteed program, available to every Russian citizen since birth. All medical services included in the state guaranteed program will be available to every Russian citizen since birth, and the number of medical services will be increased every year. At first, I thought Putin's government is not dim, are poor enough to rely on the sale of resources to make ends meet, I heard that even to the aircraft carrier destroyers and other gasoline money shortages, but also to swell the face of the fat, hard to the people under the rule of what to engage in free medical care. After a second thought, no, Putin is a man, IQ should not have a problem ah - I increasingly feel that the past about the so-called poor Russia is just someone forced into my head of the false impression only.

For a society that has not yet reached the point of "all for one, one for all", free healthcare is a major social welfare benefit that protects people's livelihoods. The social welfare of the people, always have to spend money, and is not an easy to pay a small amount of money, therefore, according to the traditional point of view, free medical care on the development of society, there are a lot of negative impacts, for example, the entire cost of medical institutions operating costs are borne by the government, will be possible due to the financial constraints caused by the medical facilities can not be in place, the quality of medical care is not very good, which will lead to the free health care This will lead to the unsustainability of free medical care. It is probably for this reason that the hospitals in India, where free medical care is practiced, are in poor condition and lack medicines, and can only provide services for the poor who are living in relative poverty (the rich call to come, but also not come ah); and North Korea's lifelong policy of free medical care and welfare package, and only benefited more than three million Pyongyang citizens, and the people of the rest of the country can only complain about how they were not born in Pyongyang's good fate.

Russia does not distinguish between the poor and the rich, and does not distinguish between citizens and peasants, the implementation of universal free medical care, where to get so much money? Is it from government taxes on land speculation? Is it by selling fighter jets to China? Or the natural gas delivered to China? Or is it sustained by the confiscation of property from corrupt officials to fill up the national treasury? And it seems that none of them, land private country, sparsely populated, can not speculate; rely on earning China's money, but also feel unreliable, if one day China is not happy do not want his things how to do, can not be chained to the fate of other people's trouser pockets; confiscation of property of corrupt officials, although short-term results, but after all, unsustainable, I am afraid that also less than out of a lot of money. With China than, really do not see the advantages of Russia's implementation of free health care to, but he did so on, really let a person confused.

The first step in the process is to make sure that you have a good understanding of what is going on in the world. Despite the reform of the health care system to change, or not fundamentally solve the problem, it is still difficult and expensive to see a doctor, the poor is still a small disease to carry a big disease drag. Academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Professor Dai Wanrong said in a satellite TV program, "the world's more than 200 countries, only more than 20 countries to see a doctor for money, the other countries to see a doctor are free." These words have hit the pain of the Chinese people. Russia is like that, but also to fight the spirit of free medical care national welfare, why can not we?

At first glance, we have the world's largest government agencies, we have the world's largest number of official vehicles, we have the world's most luxurious configuration of the office building, we have the world's most numerous names of the three public consumption, we have the world's largest collection of corrupt officials, from the viewpoint of the country is not bad money, but the country is poor to the implementation of the national free medical social welfare money. But the country is short of money to provide free medical care and social welfare to its citizens. Look again, medical examination is more and more expensive, drug price difference is getting bigger and bigger, the hospital building is getting higher and higher, the doctor's income is getting more and more, from this point of view, medical treatment has been more and more faded from the angelic nature of saving lives, saving lives is more and more oriented to the profit-oriented secular industry. The first time I saw this, I was able to see the doctor, and he said, "I don't have to pay to see the doctor, I don't have to pay to see the doctor, I don't have to pay to see the doctor, I don't have to pay to see the doctor, I don't have to pay to see the doctor, I don't have to pay to see the doctor.

We are the world's 2nd largest economy, and our decades of reform and opening up have proven the incomparable superiority of our social system - even though we have not yet been able to enjoy free healthcare, and even though Russia, which is not as strong as we are, has already implemented free healthcare. At this point, I suddenly recalled a short story about an interview with the Minister of Health on the program "Xiao Cui Speaks Out", in which he said, "We provided free cataract surgery for an elderly woman in a rural area. When the gauze was removed, she could see, and she did thank the Party! Thank the government! On her own, she could not have afforded the surgery in her lifetime." But Cui asked rhetorically, "She worked hard all her life and couldn't even afford a cataract surgery, so who does she have to hate?" This is not easy to say, just like living in India to enjoy free medical care for the poor hate themselves why not rich, otherwise you can go to the conditions and technology of better hospitals to receive treatment, just like living in North Korea did not enjoy free medical care for the people hate themselves why not born in Pyongyang, otherwise you can enjoy the social welfare of free education and medical care for life.

Russia's free medical care, whether the ordinary people to reach the other side of the universal value of happiness, is not yet sure, but there is a disease can not see a disease can not afford to see the livelihood of the situation, it must be from the other side of the universal value of happiness is still far, far away.