I. In the discussion of the concept of nature, I like to use the corresponding mathematical formulas of scientific theories to argue their own points of view, and there is a tendency to fall into the deeper investigation of the scientific theories themselves. I think we should try to use a concise way to describe the problem, do not quote too many mathematical formulas and avoid the scientific and technological theory itself. In the study of the concept of nature, we should always pay attention to two points: firstly, the concept of nature should be grasped as a general view of the natural world and should play a corresponding guiding role in natural science and technology; secondly, the concept of nature, as an important part of the dialectical method of nature, is also important for the national policies, such as "science and education to develop the country", "scientific and technological innovation to build up the country", and "scientific and technological innovation to build up the country". Secondly, as an important part of the dialectic of nature, the concept of nature also has a role to play in national policies, such as "developing the country through science and education" and "establishing the country through scientific and technological innovation". Why do we need to do this? If the concept of nature quotes too many complicated mathematical formulas in the process of its formation, it will lose its generality and universality. It is because the object of study of the view of nature is the whole of nature, and thus has to play a guiding role for the whole of nature; it does not just come from a certain part of nature and have an effect on a certain part of this particular nature. The formulas cited are generally from a particular discipline, so they are not universally valid. In addition, a person who specializes in science and technology is generally engaged in a certain profession, so he may not know or know very little about disciplines that are not his profession, so he may not be familiar with formulas that have little to do with his profession in the course of his study and research of the view of nature. In that case the discussion of formulas or the practice of arguing for a view of nature with the aid of formulas seems to make little sense. This is one thing. Secondly, if the concept of nature is to be used as a guiding principle in the formulation of national scientific and technological strategies, then it should be described in a concise but not too profound manner. Such a requirement may be difficult to implement, but it can be a direction to try. In recent years, Science Publishing House has introduced several sets of Japanese science and technology textbooks covering basic subjects and advanced technologies such as electronics, electricity, information, communication, automation, optics, etc. For example, "21st Century Electronics", "21st Century Electronics", and "21st Century Science and Technology". For example, such as "21st century electrical and electronic engineers series", "electronic circuits," "electronic circuits illustrated readings" and so on. One of the characteristics of such books is that in the process of writing does not focus on the analysis of specific theorems, formulas, the derivation process, and not too much constraints on the process of solving specific problems, but focus on the whole range of disciplines involved in the introduction of the subject system, as far as possible to achieve a wide range of coverage, so that readers in the corresponding books after reading the subject can have a clear understanding of the subject as a whole. And the books have a lot of diagrams and charts, which look very easy to understand. At the same time, only from the thickness of these books compared with other similar books are relatively thin, like the thickness of the domestic elementary school students' textbooks, giving people the initial impression that there is no longer the terror of the brick-thick tome, and the feeling is easier to approach. If the study of the concept of nature can do so, then some non-"professionals (refers to specializing in the study of dialectics of nature scholars)" will be easier to learn and accept it, so that the dialectics of nature easier to play a guiding role in the real world.
Secondly, the scarcity of natural dialectics researchers has made the current study of the concept of nature lag behind the development of science and technology. To solve this problem, we should cultivate talents with high philosophical literacy and scientific cultivation so that the study of the concept of nature can synchronize with or follow the development of natural science. As one of the cores of philosophy, the view of nature has a direct interaction and dialectical effect with science. But no matter what kind of content and form the view of nature has, it is always subject to the constraints of science as a practice; the development of science determines the shape of the view of nature. Engels said, "What pushes philosophers forward in the long period from Descartes to Hegel and from Hobbes to Feuerbach is never, as they think, only the force of pure thought. On the contrary, what really pushed them forward was primarily the powerful and increasingly rapid progress of natural science and industry." The metaphor of the advance of natural science determining the advance of philosophers is that the development of natural science determines the development of philosophy. The view of nature is a philosophical idea directly linked to natural science and is supposed to be constrained by science. But this may not be the case in reality, and there may well be a disconnect between the study of the view of nature and its theoretical source, science and technology. Those who come from science and technology may be less educated in philosophy and even social sciences, while those who come from liberal arts may have the same problem in scientific theories. How can this problem be solved? I think it makes sense to strengthen the training of people with both high philosophical literacy and good scientific theory skills, and we should work in this direction.
Thirdly, insufficient attention has been paid to the role of the concept of nature, and there is a tendency for the study of the concept of nature to be out of touch with reality. In order to address this problem, we should emphasize the guiding role of the concept of nature on science and technology and its impact and influence on society and economy (such as the strategy of sustainable development), and increase the publicity of the practical significance of the concept of nature in close connection with the social reality, economic life, and the ecological environment. In the textbook (New Theory of Natural Dialectics (Revised Edition), Shaanxi People's Publishing House), in the second chapter "Contemporary View of Nature", it is felt that the guiding role of the view of nature on science and technology is less elaborated, and in this book, the relationship between the view of nature and the society is put in the seventh chapter "Coordinated Development of Science and Technology, Economy, Society and Environment", In addition, in this book, the relationship between nature and society is put in Chapter 7 "Coordinated Development of Science, Technology, Economy, Society and Environment", which somewhat reduces the strength of the discussion on this issue. In addition, the examples cited in the illustrations on the concept of nature are a bit too old. I think it is better to tighten the integration of such examples with reality, so as to reflect the important role of the concept of nature nowadays. For example, in the part of the concept of nature involves the relationship between man and nature in teaching can try to use multimedia means to strengthen the effect of teaching, there are many materials in this regard, there are documentaries, there are related pop songs (like Michael Jackson's "Early"). Jackson's "Earth Song", "Heal the World" MTV are profoundly reflecting the contradiction between mankind and nature, has a strong infectious force), and so on; in the discussion of sustainable development strategy of the negative typical, the reality of the There are many examples. For example, although the state has made clear regulations on the conditions for local introduction of foreign investment, for example, highly polluting enterprises are not allowed to invest in factories in the territory of the People's Republic of China, the reality is not like this, I work in Dongguan, Guangdong Province, to go to the company needs to pass through a 10,000-strong large-scale foreign-funded printing and dyeing factories, the dyeing and dyeing factories around the year-round horrific smoke, with the smoke floating pungent smell of chemicals. The smell of chemicals floated along with the fumes. Other electronic factories and plastic factories, though less polluting than the printing and dyeing factory, are even more numerous, and can be said to be almost everywhere over there. Yet these factories continue to produce every day, year after year. I once wondered why the local government didn't shut down these factories, leaving them free to pollute the blue sky above our heads. The reason is very simple: their view of nature has been distorted by economic interests, or it can be said that they do not have a correct and complete view of nature. Although there are national laws and local regulations, but for those people are "the upper policy, the lower policy", which can not be said to be a kind of sadness. What is even sadder is that we not only allow others to pollute our environment for the sake of economic interests, but we ourselves are also stepping up to pollute our own homes and even ourselves. In my original work have access to some of the chemical industry (I was engaged in the work of chemical automation equipment design and production), according to my understanding, China's chemical industry is more developed in several provinces are basically concentrated in the southeast coastal area, including Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Fujian, Guangdong, Shandong, Hebei, etc., but at the same time, the environmental pollution of these places is also very serious. I have personally been to several places in Zhejiang and Jiangsu, and I have witnessed it with my own eyes; I also heard a student from a certain township in Zhejiang say in a conversation with his classmates that the chemical pollution there was very serious, and now there have been some visible consequences: in recent years, the rate of spontaneous abortions among the local women has increased significantly. I was shocked by these real-life examples, but I felt that there was nothing I could do about it. So I hope that in the dialectics of nature related research to strengthen the emphasis on these aspects and publicity, awakening people to protect the environment, love the earth, *** with the cherish our *** with the conscience of the homeland, I do not think that these things can only be some folk environmental protection groups in a corner of the earth to do the moral appeal, the dialectics of nature should be able to stand up to wave the flag and shouting and play the role of deafening.