In her "Human Trojan Horse Project", she mentioned her own accident: she fell on her back while traveling abroad, and the doctor suggested the first operation. Results After FM, she went to see a doctor twice, and the conclusion was that she recovered directly without surgery.
It's amazing. Of course I believe it is true, but I just don't agree with her explanation.
Then she also mentioned that there is a scientific law behind this.
This rule is briefly summarized as follows:
So what determines energy? It's frequency. As long as a person adjusts the frequency, it will lead to changes in all the elements that make up the body, which in turn will lead to changes in physical health, interpersonal relationships, wealth and so on.
People and things with the same frequency will be attracted, and wealth itself has frequency. As long as your frequency is the same as that of wealth, wealth is easily attracted. This is the law of attraction.
So, how do you know what frequency you are and how do you adjust the frequency?
The answer is: your emotions.
Li cited the research of scientist David Hawkins, that is, the frequency table of emotional energy correspondence, or Hawkins energy rating table for short.
From this picture, we can see different emotions, corresponding to completely different energy. What kind of mood, what kind of energy state, what kind of life state.
You see, with the support of scientists' theories and the appearance of famous writers, FM has become the mantra of believers' body and mind. It seems that as long as the mood is adjusted, the frequency is right, the frequency is right, and life is right.
Doesn't that sound great?
But the truth is, all of the above are wrong.
Impossible, I have a scientific basis. Teacher Xin Pin is also a well-known best-selling author. How could it be wrong?
Yes, Mr. Li Xinpin is a well-known copywriter, a well-known advertiser and a very powerful best-selling author in Taiwan Province Province, but I have to say that liberal arts students are really amateurs when it comes to science.
Hawkins' energy scale is described by them as evidence that science has accepted, as if it were all scientific knowledge.
But imagine, if David Hawkins really discovered such a great theory, why didn't he win the Nobel Prize in Physics? Well, the Nobel Prize is too hard to win. There should be many real references to Hawkins' papers in the scientific community, but why do mainstream physicists seldom mention Hawkins' theory?
Because professionals don't agree with his theory that much.
Hawkins' energy level comes from the conclusion of an experiment he did.
How is this experiment done?
The first step is to find a group of people who take part in the test and show them different words. Such as positive, optimistic, cross, six-pointed star and so on. Let them describe different feelings and then test their muscle strength. By observing their emotions after reading different words, the changes of their muscle strength were tested with instruments.
Note that Hawkins explained from the beginning that this experiment is an experiment of human kinematics.
So how did this experiment come up with a table with so-called consciousness level numbers corresponding to different emotions, that is,150,200,310?
Hawkins hypothesis:
Step 2: Find a tester to test muscle strength.
Choose two people, the subjects extend their arms parallel to the ground, and the testers press their arms with their hands. The subjects tried not to let the tester hold down their arms, while the tester tried to hold down the subjects' arms and measured their strength with some instruments.
The tester said a positive word, such as Lincoln. According to Hawkins' test, the subject's muscle strength will increase at this time. Then the tester began to ask, what is your emotion, if it is expressed in numbers, and then conducted the following numerical test:
Is there an emotional number of 100? Strength, truth;
Is there an emotional number of 150? Strength, truth;
Is there an emotional number of 200? Strength, truth;
Is there an emotional number of 250? Weaken strength and lie;
Is there an emotional number of 240? Weaken strength and lie;
Is there an emotional number of 230? Strength, truth;
Is there an emotional number of 23 1? Weaken strength and lie;
Then come to the conclusion that the emotion caused by the word "Lincoln", measured by numbers, is 230.
Similarly, use the same two people to test and ask a negative word, such as Hitler. You can use the same process to test this emotional number, such as 50.
David Hawkins used this method to calculate the average scores of various emotions through people of different races, ages, languages, nationalities and cultures for more than ten years, and then made such a table.
Okay, what about David Hawkins' experimental department? It's quite scientific, which conforms to the double-blind random test. The sample size is large enough and the spanning time is long enough, but is his conclusion right?
The answer is: it's hard to say.
David Hawkins' experiment, under the strict definition of science, can only draw the conclusion that a person who feels different emotional states will have different effects on muscle strength, and this effect can be quantified.
But he jumped directly from muscle strength to consciousness frequency, which is a huge leap, which is equivalent to this proof.
It is also equivalent to such a joke:
You can't. This is a matter of course.
The problem with David Hawkins' experiment is the frequency of muscle strength ≠ consciousness.
Muscle strength is muscle strength, and the frequency of consciousness is the frequency of consciousness (whether there is a frequency of consciousness is inconclusive at present), which is completely different. You can't infer the frequency of a person's consciousness at that time from his muscle strength in a certain state. Otherwise, with his experimental conclusion, he would have won the Nobel Prize in Physics. How can this theory not be accepted by mainstream physicists?
This Hawkins energy meter, once introduced, has not been recognized by mainstream physicists, but it has been regarded as a treasure by countless physical and mental writers, and many inferences have been derived, such as:
Whether a person can find a suitable spouse is related to his frequency of consciousness. Low frequency of consciousness can only attract love rat (female);
A person's wealth level is related to his consciousness frequency, and wealth itself has frequency. As long as your frequency is low, you can't make money.
A person's health level is related to his consciousness frequency. If the frequency is low, his health will usually be unhealthy.
Wait, wait.
We ancients once said, "A word that is true is false to thousands of books." .
You have written several books, but the basic theories are all wrong. How can you be right?
Let's look at the inference of this wealth. Whether a person can make money depends on whether he can resonate with wealth at the same frequency. What is the frequency of wealth? Hawkins' statement (or the * * * knowledge of a body and mind writer) is at least 3 10, and the corresponding emotion is "initiative".
The screenwriter of Body and Mind began to say that if your emotions are greed, anger and pride, corresponding to 125, 150 and 175 respectively, then you can't make money, because this is not the same as the frequency of wealth, how can you make money!
That sounds reasonable. The rich are morally noble, while the poor often lack moral quality, which is completely in line with the beautiful expectations of mankind.
However, this is obviously a taken-for-granted understanding.
The man above, in order to earn his own money, can completely make a country (or even many countries) in dire straits, and the people are in dire straits, but he is unmoved at all. In his private life, he often changes girlfriends, and the latest girlfriend is more than 20 years younger than him. Do you think he is greedy? He writes his own books, thinking that his actions are natural selection and have no moral burden, completely ignoring the moral condemnation of mainstream scholars. Do you think he is arrogant?
But will he not make money? He is the most powerful hedge fund investor in the world, and george soros is also behind the Asian financial crisis.
Look at this man up there. He is also an investor. He will buy a troubled company through hostile takeover, then lay off employees on a large scale, or even fire the entire management, and then replace it with a group of his own. When the business improves, he will sell the company, regardless of the feelings of employees and management. Do you think such people are greedy? Is he proud? He often publicly harassed people in the media to express his anger. Anyone who offends him will be retaliated.
But will he not make money? He is a famous Wall Street investor, known as The Wolf of Wall Street carl icahn.
So don't listen to the so-called frequent nonsense about wealth. How much money a person can earn has nothing to do with his mood. Greed, pride and anger are all normal emotional reactions of a person, initiative and courage are also emotional reactions of a normal person. Making money is making money, and emotions are emotions. They have nothing to do with wealth.
David Hawkins' energy scale is just a scientific hypothesis of David Hawkins, which is far from being recognized by mainstream scientists and is not a scientific truth. You must understand the process of his theory before you can understand whether his conclusion is credible.
Furthermore, even if David Hawkins' energy scale really finds the corresponding relationship between emotion and consciousness frequency, it can't be concluded that frequency can determine everything. Wealth, health and gender relations are all determined by many complicated factors. Any attempt to solve all problems with one factor is essentially an IQ tax.
However, we should also see the fact that a person's health level does have a great relationship with emotions, and we do see that some people with positive energy will infect others, or some people who practice FM. After adjusting the frequency, they did see more good things. How do you explain this?
Maybe next time.