"Night of the Fortress" officially started the pre-emptive experience test on July 25th. This game, which combines the elements of free architecture and tower defense, has also attracted many players' attention, and its animation style is also dynamic. So is this illusory 4-engine game worth buying?
First of all, the previous stimulus Gameranx brought you a new issue of "Watch Before Buying" and its comments on the game. Chinese subtitles are provided by the star subtitle group. Epic games can be described as a legendary studio in the game industry. They not only have. War machine? Such a frank third-person shooting masterpiece will also be a famous illusion? Series engines have been brought into the game industry, constantly pushing the game screen forward. This time they brought Night of the Fortress? It also stood out in the picture and probably attracted the attention of many players in the first time. But there are more than just pictures in the game.
Second, the game planning In the game that supports the cooperation of up to 4 people, players need to collect information of different map levels, build their own fortresses, arrange traps and other fortifications, and finally repel intruders. But even weirder, Night at the Fortress itself is actually a free game. However, the current preemption experience stage requires players to spend $60 to buy a complete 3A game.
Third, the player's satisfaction However, some players may think that the game may adopt the usual paid game mode at this stage, but the content of the game is still built around the free game mode, that is, various micro-transaction systems, and players can spend the money in the game to buy various supply boxes. Of course, the money can be bought through krypton gold. Fortunately, at present, it seems that players don't need bonuses, and the rewards given in the game tasks are basically enough for players. Generally speaking, it's actually more like a boring game. Blacklisting with friends is the most interesting. But at the same time, this game is far from perfect.