The physical examination found pulmonary nodules, but the hospital did not inform the reexamination. A year later, it developed into tuberculosis. Is the hospital responsible?

? I think the hospital is responsible, because you clearly found that people have pulmonary nodules, why didn't you tell others? Where there is a reason not to tell others, we should tell others in time, not hide it, when the hospital comes out for physical examination. Because people pay for treatment, not for you.

So I think it's a bit wrong for the hospital to do this, and I think the responsibility should be attributed to the hospital, because your physical examination shows that people are sick. If you tell them earlier, they can treat the disease earlier and not develop tuberculosis. So that people now spend more money to treat diseases, and they may not be cured, and they are not sure whether they will fall behind. These are all human health problems.

This is also because you don't tell people that you are sick after the physical examination. I really don't think the hospital should hide it. Even if they have some minor diseases that are not worth treating, what if they develop into serious diseases? Although you may have meant well at that time, it turned out to be all wet. Therefore, in a big institution like Music, if someone is sick, you should tell them directly, otherwise they will definitely talk to you about things in the future, saying that you didn't tell them at the beginning, so you got tuberculosis. Actually, I don't think regular hospitals will do this.

Once a regular hospital finds out what's wrong with you, even if it's a small cold, he will definitely tell you. Let you take the medicine from them, and they will also benefit. I won't go until I tell you. It's not good for them or for you. They can't make money. You have to talk to them when you are sick. They won't ask for trouble like this, so no matter where you go to see a doctor, you should keep the doctor's evidence so that you can convince them later.