Let's talk about this first.
This happened in Mianyang, Sichuan. A man and his wife chose to divorce because of emotional discord. The children follow the man, and the ex-wife does not need to pay alimony. The good times didn't last long. Men have physical problems, and their work wages drop. The man applied to the court to ask his ex-wife to pay 1 0,000 yuan monthly maintenance. After the trial, the local court held that the man's income decreased due to physical reasons, the children grew up, the expenses increased, and life was relatively difficult. In order to ensure the healthy growth of the children, the court decided that the mother should pay 500 yuan monthly maintenance.
The court explained it this way:
The principle of "the best interests of minors" is a basic principle of marriage and family legislation in China. When trying alimony disputes, the interests of minors should be the basic starting point and the ultimate pursuit. When other interests conflict with the interests of minors, the interests of minors should be in a more priority position.
Why did this matter get a hot search? What do you think of this?
1. Can the divorce agreement be "destroyed" at will?
This so-called divorce agreement is a civil agreement in the legal sense, and it is necessary to know that the agreement reached by the parties themselves is legally binding. If this agreement does not violate laws and regulations, and all parties can perform the agreement within the term of the agreement, then this agreement shall be regarded as valid and implemented.
However, in this case, this alimony is mainly for the children. When the man has physical problems, his work salary drops, and the children advocate increasing alimony, the court supports the children's litigation request according to law, which should be a necessary guarantee based on the rights and interests of children. It should be said that this is in line with public order, good customs and social morality, and of course it is also conducive to the healthy growth of minors.
2. If it is transsexual, will the seminar be so enthusiastic?
In fact, we think that if children follow their mothers, many people will give the same thing directly. After all, it is for the children. Even if we go to court, we will say that the focus of this matter will not be "the man wants to break the divorce agreement". Perhaps more people will support the court's decision.
Finally, I want to say: although divorce is an adult's business, we believe that everyone should think more about their children, and don't make them feel bad just because they are angry. Moreover, it is best to make an agreement at the time of divorce, and don't make it difficult to do it in the future, and the contradictions will escalate.