Is it plagiarism? Most of the answers are from the perspective of social morality or feeling. I will talk about "plagiarism" from the technical point of view of laws and regulations. Is the cover photo of Meng Jia's latest song (new work) suspected of "copying" the original shot by overseas photographers? If translated into laws and regulations, it is "whether the new work infringes the copyright of the original". For this problem, the distinguishing standard in laws and regulations is called "substantial similarity of contracts". As long as these two requirements are met and not used reasonably, it constitutes infringement.
"Contact" refers to the probability that the person who writes a new work has contact with the original, because if there is no possibility of contact at all, even if the two works are exactly the same, it does not constitute infringement (although the probability of such a thing is relatively small, it is theoretically creative). In practice, if the new work is published after the original work, the probability of contact can be determined. Meng Jia this matter, the standard of "contact" has undoubtedly been reached. "Substantial similarity" is its literal meaning, depending on whether the two works are similar.
The actual standard of distinction varies according to different types of works. For example, it is very complicated to distinguish the substantive similarity between written works or film and television production works, and it must be compared with the constituent elements such as characters and plots. In addition, a lot of plagiarism is not low-level plagiarism of "immediate plagiarism", but is carried out according to advanced plagiarism means such as "pseudo original". However, it is much easier to have a more substantial similarity among the photographs. As far as Meng Jia is concerned, the general public can make some distinctions. Since the two requirements of "connection" and "substantial similarity" have been achieved, and the application is a profitable application such as the latest song cover map, there will be no reasonable use probability, which will definitely infringe the copyright of the original work and constitute plagiarism.
Analyzing this photo doesn't make me feel uncomfortable, but it makes me want to explore some of the items conveyed. The application and color of all light sources in the original work are relatively simple, that is, sunlight, which gives people a clean and fresh feeling. The female model's current natural light conveys some expectation and glory. But the most important thing is that although the female model's figure is very artistic, this photo makes people forget to peek at the body and let people explore the female model's eyes, small expressions and psychological state.
First of all, everyone looks at the posture, which is very natural and stretched, and there is no feeling of being coy. It looks comfortable. But vision is more worth studying. Her eyes have a trace of inexplicable sadness, shallow alienation, giving people a long feeling. What is she thinking? What is she thinking? If I only look at small facial expressions, she wants to remind me of something that happened in the movie. Female number one has something on her mind, hugging herself and looking at the distance. Like Cecilia Cheung in the King of Comedy Movies.
To sum up, China actresses basically can't show their strength by undressing. Because this body has no energy at first glance, this is not to accuse the singer of not training hard, but probably the cover picture of the damage caused by many racial and aesthetic stereotypes. You said that you would probably express the "school bullying incident" in a more timely manner, but when it comes to female stars taking off their clothes, you can look back at the "Pink Ribbon Public Welfare Series" in Fashion and Health magazine. I know,, Bing Bing,, Angel,,, Li,,, Mao Amin, Ma Yili, Guo Jingjing and so on.
From 2005 to now, in short, you can see that from the initial nakedness, more and more people are reborn. Is social fashion becoming traditional? No, girls' long skirts are getting shorter and shorter these ten years. It's just that the original magazines and periodicals are invisible to children. Now, it is "nothing is invisible to children". Although there is no legal provision, film propaganda organizations should know their obligations.