An old man with white hair was stopped by the driver because he didn't have a mobile phone and couldn't scan the health code. Because the old man didn't get off the bus, he was condemned by the passengers on the bus. I don't think anyone is right or wrong in this matter. The unreasonable reason is that the measures are not perfect, and the targeted population does not take into account the elderly who can't use smart phones.
First, there is nothing wrong with the old man. Although the elderly have no health code, or don't need health code, they still wear masks, which shows that the elderly are aware of prevention. However, the old man did not get off the bus, which led to the bad attitude of passengers and drivers. I think the rules are dead, but people will be flexible. You can't deprive the elderly of the right to ride just because they don't have health rules.
Second, there is nothing wrong with the driver and passengers. They are also for safety reasons, but they have not learned to put themselves in each other's shoes, and they will get old one day. If you are an old man and no one helps you out of trouble, will you feel that there is no warmth in this society? Although the old man doesn't know mobile phone technology and can't show his health code, I think there is always a way to let the old man take the bus instead of driving him away.
Third, the consideration of the problem is not comprehensive. I think it is because the regulatory measures of relevant departments are not well considered. They don't consider group travel for the elderly. The Health Law is not suitable for the elderly. Maybe we can give some health certificates to the elderly, or we can take their temperature and let them wear masks and other preventive measures. It is said that we should respect the elderly, and we should not ignore these because of the epidemic.
Finally, epidemic prevention and control is of course important, but we can't lose what we have been advocating for fear of infection.