Do husband and wife have the right and obligation of sexual life?

Sex between husband and wife is both a responsibility and an obligation. Although the new marriage law doesn't even mention a word "sex", let alone sexual obligations. However, sexual rights and obligations are easily supported in the new marriage law. Article 3 of the general principles of the new marriage law clearly stipulates that it is forbidden to arrange, buy or sell marriages and other acts that interfere with the freedom of marriage. It is forbidden to ask for property through marriage. Bigamy is prohibited. Spouses are prohibited from living together with others. Domestic violence is prohibited. Abuse and abandonment between family members are prohibited. "This means that the husband and wife have not fulfilled their sexual obligations, and the infringed party is still not allowed to live with others, let alone defend their rights through bigamy or domestic violence. Obviously, this is not the original intention of the new marriage law. Article 4 of the general principles of the new marriage law stipulates that "husband and wife should be faithful to each other and respect each other; Family members should respect the old and love the young, help each other and maintain equal, harmonious and civilized marriage and family relations. "Obviously, one party's failure to perform sexual obligations will damage the sexual rights that the other party should enjoy. So where do couples start to respect each other, help each other and maintain equal, harmonious and civilized family relations? Of course, we must defend our rights according to law.

Why is sex an obligation and right that couples should enjoy? We need to find out the following questions:

What is the essential difference between humans and animals? The most essential difference between humans and animals is the ability of group error correction. More than 90% people agree that sex is beneficial to people's physical and mental health, and it is a lubricant and sublimation agent for couples' feelings. This is right and normal, then the opposite is wrong and abnormal. Since it is wrong and abnormal, it should be corrected.

Second, what is the purpose of making laws in China?

The purpose of enacting laws in China is to protect national security, maintain social stability and safeguard the legitimate interests of the people.

The purpose of China's new marriage law is to standardize marriage and family relations, which is conducive to social stability and family unity. Conducive to the healthy development of our human society. Therefore, it is impossible for the new marriage law to ignore the interests of the majority and social stability and harmony, saying that couples do not have to fulfill their "sexual obligations."

Thirdly, sex is a human instinct, and it is a human physiological and spiritual need. Article 4 of the general principles of the new marriage law clearly requires that husband and wife should be faithful to each other. Because one party fails to fulfill its sexual obligations, the other party may suspect that the other party is meeting his physical and spiritual needs elsewhere, which lays the foundation for disharmony.

Fourth, marriage should be the product of love, and love is the inevitable product of the development of social civilization. Sex between husband and wife is not only an obligation, but also an active behavior. Since you love each other, you should pay for it.

It is everyone's wish to pursue civilization and a happy marriage. It is against the will of most people that couples do not have to perform their sexual obligations in the marriage law. This is definitely not the original intention of the new marriage law. Some people say out of context that husband and wife do not have to fulfill their sexual obligations, but only have the obligation of "family planning". Isn't this anti-humanity? How many people get married just to carry on the family line? Isn't this the extermination of mankind? People are hurt by sexual issues, but they are not protected by rights. Isn't it urging human beings to protect their rights through violence and bloodshed? What's the difference between humans and other animals? Is this to bring mankind back to the bloody and violent animal kingdom or primitive society? Then what is the purpose of human beings to spare no effort to pursue social civilization and explore science? Isn't it just to benefit mankind and make people happier?

The reason why there are so many cases in which the rights are not protected because of endless sexual obligations is that the law enforcers take it out of context and ignorance distorts the new marriage law. This is not the original intention of the new marriage law.