Which is better, money or power?

If power refers to officials, it must be money. If power refers to the emperor, it must be power. It's simple. Some rich emperors have them, and some rich emperors don't. If the emperor has monopoly power, he can monopolize all profitable industries, such as banks, land and energy enterprises ... The most important thing is to monopolize the right to print money and armed groups. So the emperor can have as many assets as he wants. It is easy for the emperor to copy the rich family, but it is difficult for the rich family to copy the emperor's family. It is easy for the emperor to rob the rich man's wife, but it is difficult for the rich man to rob the emperor's wife. The emperor can collect the inheritance tax of the rich, but the rich can't collect the inheritance tax of the emperor. There is no emperor now. If everyone follows the law, it must be money. Money is half an emperor. Moreover, power cannot be used privately or inherited. And it is strictly limited. And money is universal.