First of all, from the perspective of people's physical and mental development, on the one hand, scientific nutrition supply and sound public health system are more conducive to people's physical growth than lack of material security and public health services. On the other hand, prosperity is more conducive to the growth of people's minds, including the improvement of cognitive ability, the cultivation of temperament and the cultivation of personality. In adversity, the learning environment is depressing, and we can recognize things, but in prosperity, it provides an encouraging educational atmosphere, which is more conducive to the systematic development of cognition. Adversity can recognize the hardships of life, but it is also prone to anxiety and pain, and even produces alienation and distrust of others. In good times, we can appreciate the warmth of family, the care of society and the value of friendship, thus having a tolerant, open and healthy mentality. In adversity, the cultivation of human character is conditional, and it is easy to go beyond the basic psychological pressure range, leading to personality distortion. In good times, the cultivation of people's character is subtle, and through active education and good temperament, a more sound personality is forged.
Secondly, from the perspective of people's socialization process, on the one hand, wealth is more conducive to meeting the growth needs of all stages of life. When we were children, the care of our families in good times gave us confidence and self-awareness, while children who grew up in broken families were prone to inferiority and suspicion. When we are teenagers, a good education in prosperity can make us succeed in our studies and live a prosperous life, but without education, we temporarily lose the support for growth and the direction of life. When we reach adulthood or even old age, prosperity enables people to gain the motivation for lifelong growth in self-affirmation, while the impact of adversity easily leads to depression and self-denial. On the other hand, prosperity is more conducive to the maturity of people's social roles, because people's growth is always marked by their independent playing of appropriate social roles. Difficulties in adversity are prone to frustration and interrupt the process of life growth. However, sustained social development, sound institutional arrangements and prosperous and harmonious daily life provide more benign space for the maturity of people's social roles.
Positive closing statement =
Xue Le: The other party just said in the last sentence that parents are parents, but growth is their own growth. But are there any parents who don't want their children to grow better? The other party actually wants to tell you today that parents all over the world say that if you make your child happy, you are wrong, because if you can't bear to watch your child suffer, you won't let him grow up. If the teacher is not strict with his students, then you are wrong, because if you are not strict with him, the children can't grow up. So if all of you here today are well-educated in prestigious schools, then I'm sorry, you haven't grown up yet.
The other party told us the story of Journey to the West, and we were very moved. But is Journey to the West conducive to the growth of the Monkey King or to the growth of ordinary people here? The Monkey King can practice your golden body for 500 years, but if you are pressed for 500 years, I'm afraid it's hard not to bend over. The Monkey King can get sharp eyes in an alchemist's furnace, but if I am in an alchemist's furnace, I'm afraid I will become a Peking Duck. So in fact, the other debater told us two things today. First, he told us that in fact, you should make more efforts in adversity. In prosperity, you may only pay three points, in adversity, you may pay eight points. Therefore, three efforts are called prosperity, and eight efforts are called adversity. But is there anyone who is depressed in adversity and drinks to drown his sorrows? Isn't there a saying that "it's more worrying to raise a glass to eliminate sorrow"? I didn't try. Is it because we are not in adversity? If some of us cherish our existing resources in prosperity, redouble our efforts and make more efforts, is it in the eyes of the other party that even if we work hard, we are still in adversity because we have these good resources and the care of our parents?
Secondly, what the other debater actually wants to tell us is that if you can stimulate your potential in the process of adversity, we should not help a blind man when he wants to cross the road, because you should tell him that the dark world is more conducive to stimulating your potential, but how can we bear it? If we see children in war and famine, the defense friends of the other side should also tell everyone that we should not lend them a helping hand, because why can't we bear to help them turn adversity into adversity and lose the motivation to grow? So today another debater can shout that many great people grew up in adversity. Yes, they are very good-looking But why should we admire them? Isn't it because they are in adversity, which is not conducive to our survival, but they can create miracles of life? But what we are going to talk about today is ordinary people. You can shout how to gain experience in adversity, but what right do you have to stop us from pursuing a happy life? If adversity gives us motivation, it is because there is sunshine in prosperity.