If a thief steals something on the seventh floor and falls to his death, are not all the residents of the building responsible? The questioner has the audacity to ask such a question.
First of all, let me tell you clearly that no one is responsible for the death of a thief who falls to his death. There is no law or regulation that requires anyone to take responsibility for the death of a thief.
On the contrary, if the thief in the process of stealing, stole something from someone's home, in the process of climbing and falling down, caused damage to the building, in the fall to the ground when the ground pedestrians or objects such as cars, garbage cans, etc., the thief's family should also bear the corresponding civil liability.
As the question said, the whole building of all households are responsible for the words, the thief is falling to the ground, hit the surface of the earth and died, that is not the people of the earth are responsible for all the people of the whole earth should be compensated together?
If this is the case, it is the biggest joke under the sky.
Sincerely, there is no denying that, in today's social reality, there are indeed many similar cases, for example, climbed the tree to steal other people's apples accidentally fell down and died to ask the tree owner to compensate, for example, to cut other people's homes just sprayed pesticide leeks ate dead to ask for compensation for the owner of the vegetables, for example, the old woman dancing together with the sudden death of disease attack, ask all the people present at the dance to compensate, and also, the child in the garden to the garden to eat, to ask for compensation. The first thing is that, for example, children playing in the garden accidentally fell and was injured, asked the neighborhood property management to compensation, etc., this kind of thing is really a lot, and are the reality of the example.
But the fact that there are such examples does not mean that those people's ideas and practices are right and have a legal basis. On the contrary, whenever these people throw out their ideas, they are often met with overwhelming opposition and even strong condemnation from society. This dooms their ideas to be unrealistic and unattainable.
As mentioned in this question, the thief fell to his death and asked the owner to pay compensation, the family of the deceased is not only impossible to get compensation, but also by the voice of social justice condemnation, the final result must be the deceased and his family to take their own humiliation, self-destruction of dignity, and can not possibly be the idea of its success.