However, due to some problems in the propaganda of the "red scarf teaching method" and the introduction of expert opinions at that time, the real thing to be learned was not well spread, so that people's understanding of the "red scarf teaching method" appeared some errors. For example, People's Education published "Our Experience in Teaching Red Scarf" after Professor Ye Cangcen's article, which is the teaching process and method designed for the lesson "Red Scarf". This paper focuses on the second class and emphasizes two points: First, the application of conversation method in the teaching process (in the form of questions). Secondly, when analyzing characters, a more detailed character analysis table is compiled "in order to guide students to systematically find out actions, thoughts and sentences that can represent Igor Ka's noble quality". The deficiency here is that we pay more attention to the "talking method" and the so-called "expression analysis" of characters, thinking that we have found the essence of the "red scarf teaching method". In fact, many people still equate the "red scarf teaching method" with the "talking method" today. The understanding of "appreciation method" and "analysis method" basically meets the same situation. This misunderstanding led to the spread of "red scarf teaching method" in the wrong direction, which had some adverse effects on the development of Chinese teaching.
Another reason why the teaching method of "red scarf" has been criticized is that the mechanical imitation of the teaching process of "red scarf" begins with learning the education and teaching experience of the Soviet Union. Public opinion pays attention to guiding and critically absorbing learning, but in the actual teaching process, it often backfires and goes to extremes. In the process of teaching reform, some teachers "regard the process and method of teaching red scarves by interns in Beijing Normal University as a formula, which can be applied to any grade and any class, so it is equally applicable." "Most teachers have adopted such a set of methods. The time is divided into four sections, and the focus of each section is the same. The analysis in the third section also draws a table. Some middle schools in Beijing are like this, and so is a middle school in Guangdong. This is true in the northeast and southwest. " This has completely fallen into the mud of formalism, resulting in the formulation and formalism of reading teaching.
Of course, in the promotion of the "red scarf teaching method", it is not that no one has noticed these problems. Mr. Zhang Lianfeng published an article aiming at the situation at that time, criticizing the formalism tendency and blind copying in the learning opinions and teaching reform, comprehensively and detailedly analyzing the learning opinions and experiences, and reminding teachers to clarify the tasks of Chinese teaching in teaching: "First, carry out ideological and political education through systematic Chinese textbooks. The second is to cultivate students' speaking and writing ability to a certain extent. First, they are required to speak clearly and write fluently, and gradually they are required to be expressive and artistic. The third is to cultivate students' ability to read various scientific books and literary works to a certain extent. " Professor Ye Cangcen also summed up Pushkin's point of view in later articles: "The first is to understand the actual level of students; The second is to give students fresh and sufficient knowledge of language and literature; Third, let students get a complete impression; The fourth is to inspire students to think more, speak more and be active; The fifth is to carry out ideological and political education correctly, which is highly ideological and political in the whole Chinese classroom. " It should be said that this summary is comprehensive and feasible. Unfortunately, it did not appear at the beginning of introducing expert opinions, but in order to correct the deviation of everyone's understanding. The "red scarf teaching method" failed to embark on a good development path.