As a public system, the problem of the take-away platform can't be solved, which is the internal problem of the platform or the platform algorithm. Because the platform caught in this strange circle wants riders to send more orders, so that they can earn more commissions and give up their hands to send more orders, so that they can earn more, but the manpower is exhausted. Even if he tries harder, how quickly he can get familiar with the route by car, his limit is still there, so the car will find a place.
The public * * * system can solve the problem of parking and misplacing vehicles. If you really want to solve the problem that the take-away vehicles are parked and placed indiscriminately, and occupy the position that should not be occupied, there should be two measures. On the one hand, it is necessary to guide this public take-out and establish an exclusive parking area. At least you have to find a place for it, where it stops is right and legal, and then there must be punishment to deter where it can't stop, and what kind of punishment you have to accept when it stops. Without the deterrent clause, it is difficult to play a really good guiding role. Deterrence means deterrence. Otherwise, without a punishment measure, he will not be punished if he knows that he has done something wrong, and he will not abide by the regulations.
It's easier said than done to promote it in the whole country, because many policies have achieved good results after being tried out in one area and need a lot of discussion. After all, the situation varies from place to place, for example, some places are full of beautiful groups, and some places are hungry. The algorithms of the two platforms are different, and the requirements for riders may be different. Although similar, there are some differences. Then how to do the greening planning of a local community is different.