What's the problem with the exam in Qingdao, Shandong Province?

March 28th, 202 1 Qingdao Teacher Recruitment Written Test. However, after the exam, many netizens posted that Qingdao teacher was suspected of leaking questions. On the material paper issued by an educational institution at the entrance of some test sites, there are many subjects with many original questions, and even the options are exactly the same. Netizens questioned whether the exam was fair and just, which triggered a heated discussion.

On the same day, some netizens broke the news in Weibo, saying that the teacher recruitment examination was suspected of leaking questions, and exposed the test information provided by a training institution before. According to netizens, many of these questions are consistent with the content of the exam, and some subjects can even get 7 out of 8 questions.

Some netizens mentioned that in fact, as early as before the exam, some training institutions claimed that they had "found out the internal questions" and sold the subject subjective question bank to the students in the WeChat group at the price of 1 yuan. On the day of the exam, the group owner also told everyone to keep a low profile and quickly dissolved the group.

After breaking the news, netizens also explained that these training institutions have been engaged in teacher recruitment training for many years, and a certain proportion of key topics are normal. "It is not an original question, it is possible to do it."

But soon, through the materials provided by the organization, netizens found that even some low-level mistakes were exactly the same as the actual test questions, and it was hard to believe that it might be a simple bet. Some netizens said that there was no experience to follow in the first year of Qingdao teachers' recruitment this year. Many candidates were desperately preparing subjective questions, but the organization could accurately predict that the exam would not take subjective questions before the exam.

Extended data:

Qingdao Education Bureau responded.

On the evening of 28th, Qingdao Education Bureau issued a statement through official website and the official Weibo. Qingdao Education Bureau said that after receiving the public opinion information of teachers' examinations in relevant districts and cities, it attached great importance to it and immediately verified the relevant situation. There are two ways to recruit teachers in this city this year. One is "pre-interview+general examination"; One is "subject written test+interview".

After investigation, the districts and cities involved in this public opinion are West Coast New District, Chengyang District, Jimo District, jiaozhou city, pingdu city and Laixi City, and the six districts and cities adopt the second form to jointly entrust the proposition. After the emergence of public opinion, the Municipal Education Bureau instructed the relevant districts and cities to immediately check the situation, report to the police in time, and inform the discipline inspection and supervision department of the situation.

At present, the public security department has been involved. The Municipal Education Bureau will urge the relevant districts and cities to find out the truth as soon as possible, report the situation in time, deal with it seriously according to law and discipline, and safeguard the fairness and justice of the teacher examination.

That night, the reporter learned from relevant channels that the public security organ had arrested a criminal suspect and the case was being handled. The relevant person in charge of Qingdao Education Bureau said that the next response measures will be decided according to the investigation results of the public security organs.