Love and health puncture

I am 43 years old, and I am really an older pregnant woman. Pregnant 19 weeks, asked for amniocentesis. According to the norms of prenatal screening, elderly pregnant women were told by doctors that amniocentesis was needed, but many pregnant women were either afraid or worried about the impact on their children and refused to do it. My real experience is really painless. When I say feeling, I feel like tickling myself, which is a little heavier and much lighter than the pain when I draw blood by infusion. It can really be described as painless. I also asked some pregnant women who had undergone amniocentesis, and most of them said that it didn't hurt, and some said it was a little painful, which was completely tolerable. This is not to say that pregnant women are strong and brave, but that the abdominal pain of pregnant women is relieved, which may be related to the sparse nerve distribution and the change of hormone level after abdominal wall swelling caused by pregnancy. I am relaxed during the puncture, which can also make the doctor's operation smoother. If pregnant women are too nervous, it may lead to the stiffness of pregnant women's abdominal muscles and even the winding of puncture needles, which is not conducive to doctors' operation and will increase pain. Most pregnant women choose to do non-invasive DNA, and some basic projects are already free in China, and additional projects need to be paid at their own expense. But non-invasive DNA examination is prenatal screening and amniocentesis is prenatal diagnosis. Although the accuracy is high, it can't reach 100%. If there is a problem with the results of noninvasive DNA, further amniocentesis is needed to confirm the diagnosis. Amniocentesis can check more diseases than noninvasive DNA examination. I wanted to do amniocentesis in one step and decided to do it.

After waiting for nearly a month, the result came out. As a result, there is no abnormality in gross chromosomes, micro-repeats are visible, and micro-repeats have unknown and definite functions. Seeing this result, my wife and I are very worried and anxious. The report did not say whether it was normal or abnormal. What shall we do? My wife and I understand this kind of report that is not clear about normal or abnormal. With the continuous development of medicine, unknown diseases are constantly being discovered and diagnosed, and some medical problems are not 100%. My wife and I have repeatedly studied the meaning of the examination report, which means that the chromosome results are generally normal, that is, there are no serious chromosome diseases such as 2 1- trisomy syndrome and 18- trisomy syndrome. Microdeletion and the result of microdeletion are microdeletions, but it is not certain whether it is pathogenic, but as far as known pathogenic microdeletions and microdeletions are concerned, no abnormalities are found. Our children have chromosome microreplications. What is the function of this chromosome? Is its repetition pathogenic? At present, medical research has not found it. This passage is a bit circuitous. What does this mean? To put it simply, a chromosome has four arms, and one arm has a problem, all of which are chromosomal diseases, which are more serious. There are many fragments on each arm. Some fragments are functional, some fragments are not functional, some fragments do not know whether they are functional, some fragments are repeated or missing, which will cause disease, some fragments are repeated or missing, which will not cure diseases, and some fragments are repeated or missing, and whether they are pathogenic has not yet been found. Our result is the replication of unknown functional fragments. I want to know what the function of this fragment is and whether the replication of this fragment is pathogenic. My wife and I got hung up, and I don't know what to do. I consulted a doctor who specializes in genetics. He asked if he had had prenatal ultrasound screening, and I told him that the results were normal. Meanwhile, I showed him the results of prenatal ultrasound screening. He suggested checking the chromosomes of both husband and wife to see if the micro-repetition of the fetus is inherited from parents. If it is inherited by parents and parents have no abnormal performance, then the fetus is normal. If microreplication is not inherited from parents, then the chromosome of the fetus has been mutated. I asked the doctor if there was a mutation in the chromosome. Must it be a cure? The doctor said that chromosomal mutation is very common, and I'm not sure if it is pathogenic. After much deliberation, my wife and I decided not to continue the examination. If this kind of micro-repetition comes from parents, it is normal because parents have no abnormal expressions and children have no expressions; If this microreplication is a mutation, it is uncertain whether it is pathogenic. I discussed with my lover: if this kind of micro-repetition is inherited from my parents, it is normal and we will continue to get pregnant; If this microreplication is a mutation, we are not sure whether it is pathogenic or not, and we will continue to get pregnant. So whether this micro-repetition is inherited from parents or sudden mutation, we will continue to get pregnant. We don't care whether this microreplication is inherited from parents or sudden mutation. What we care about is whether the fetus is healthy, and there is no need to continue the examination. Of course, we expect to have a healthy baby, but we also have psychological preparation and determination. We will accept it anyway. In case there is anything bad, we will bear it ourselves. In case the baby is unhealthy, we will keep him for life.