So in addition to Android, there is another system that everyone may have forgotten. It used to be the so-called third largest smartphone operating system, which is Microsoft's WP system. Maybe many people have never used this system. I was lucky enough to play a mobile phone equipped with WP system before. The system is clean and concise, and the system runs very fast. The biggest feature of my WP system is that it runs smoothly, without the complicated operation of Android system.
It's just that Microsoft still focuses on the computer, not on the mobile phone system, and the use of software developers is really rare. Gradually, this system was gradually eliminated, because as long as it is a new mobile phone that is experienced by yourself, WP system must be installed, but it does not make a free system. If every mobile phone has to be equipped with a system, there will be a charge.
WP is the same as IOS, only WP is not stuck! I always thought Windows Phone was out of date. If you can give more support, Windows Phone system will definitely be comparable to IOS system!
I thought of the last Windows Phone-HP Elite x3. This mobile phone is equipped with a snapdragon 820 and 2K screen, with a battery capacity of 4 150mAh and a resolution of 2560x 1440 pixels. More importantly, it supports Windows Phone 10 system.
Then, this mobile phone, which still costs more than 5,000 yuan, seems a bit untimely and its sales volume is very bleak.
However, it cannot be said that WP system is not good. WP system also adopts closed ecological management and strictly controls memory, which makes Windows Phone system very smooth. What's more, it doesn't eat hardware like iOS.
However, due to the lack of good ecology, less application development, small investment by mobile phone manufacturers and insufficient capital chain, windows phone has become a masterpiece.
In fact, it is also a closed-source system of iOS. The same system does not have so much loss in mobile phone configuration, and there is no background software (pseudo-background) to keep the mobile phone smooth.
This is different from Android, which is an open source system. There are too many pre-installed software in the system, occupying too much RAM storage, and the operation mechanism is easy to affect the mobile phone.
Therefore, if WP insists all the time, the ending may be different!
Personally, I think Android doesn't lose to ios at present.
At present, the mobile phone sector is mainly divided into two camps, namely Android and IOS.
IOS is a closed-source system, which requires strict software shelves, and the memory management mechanism is very different from Android, making IOS always in the first place in fluency. Although Android has been optimized for so many years, its fluency has been greatly improved, and the software startup speed is also very fast. However, due to the lack of Google store and Google service in China, the domestic Android system is chaotic and there are too many advertisements, which leads to the slow response of mobile phones.
Therefore, I personally think that the fluency of Android is not less than that of IOS, just because the domestic software supervision is not strict and there is no GMS of Google, so it gives people an illusion in China that the Android system is much worse than IOS, and the fluency of the two is comparable. The difference is the optimization and adaptation of third-party software.
Speaking of third-party software, I think of another system here, that is WP. This system is really great in fluency, but because the software ecosystem did not develop and eventually led to extinction, Microsoft gave up. If Microsoft seizes the opportunity, I think WP is most likely to become a system beyond IOS.
Therefore, the system has no absolute speed, especially in this mature stage. The only difference is the optimization and adaptation between manufacturers.
The charging era of Android system is coming, so what is the next operating system? What can be like the internet of things, TV, car networking, etc. Like iOS? Then there is only one Yun OS!
YunOS is a data and service-oriented Internet of Things operating system based on cloud computing developed by Alibaba Group. Is yunos system easy to use? How about yunos system? What are the advantages and disadvantages of yunos system? Yunos has high compatibility and expansibility, and is widely used in various Internet of Things devices, including smart phones, Internet cars, Internet TVs, smart homes, smart wear and other smart terminals, as well as chips and sensors.
Is yunos system easy to use?
YunOS has advanced technology and innovative functions, supports HTML5 ecology and original Web services, enhances cloud service capabilities, and has a one-stop data platform and a multi-level security framework. Is yunos system easy to use? YunOS realizes the Internet of Everything through trusted perception, reliable connection, distributed computing and efficient service.
There are two kinds of YunOS that we come into contact with every day, namely mobile phone system and TV system based on YunOS. Regarding the YunOS system, many friends who are interested in the system will have questions in their hearts, "What is the relationship between YunOS and Android?" Or "What is the difference between yunos and miui, flyme, emui and other mobile phone systems?" "How to use YunOS system? What about the YunOS system? " I am here to give you an answer.
1
As can be seen from the above figure, YunOS and Android are both operating systems developed for smart devices such as mobile terminals, and they are also developed based on Linux kernel. In order not to make wheels repeatedly, YunOS is equipped with a Alibaba Cloud virtual machine designed, built and developed independently, which is compatible with all apps developed based on Android, and developers do not need to redevelop apps for YunOS platform. Simply put, YunOS and Android are two different systems, but YunOS is compatible with Android app at the same time.
Advantages and disadvantages of yunos system
Compared with Android, YunOS operating system is more reliable in security than Android. Android can get the highest root privilege, but YunOS does not support it. Of course, there are advantages and disadvantages. Users who use YunOS system can't get the highest root rights like Android users, and they can't modify their mobile phones at will. The advantage is that without root authority, any operation will not destroy the integrity of the system, and the background of third-party software is under the supervision of YunOS, so the security of user information is naturally protected. Moreover, the trend of root mobile phones has passed, and people who love to toss mobile phones have become a minority. In the past, YunOS had functions that needed root, and YunOS could meet the needs of most people for certain functions.
The aforementioned miui, flyme and emui are the mobile phone systems of Xiaomi, Meizu and Huawei respectively. These systems are all developed based on the bottom of Android, using the core of Android system, and then optimizing the interface of the system on this basis. In addition, the self-developed functions that are different from other customized Android systems and their own cloud service systems are called their own systems. In fact, it is still an Android system in essence, but it has been approved in a different shell. However, what needs special introduction is that some Charm Blue mobile phones are equipped with flyme system customized based on YunOS, which is safer and more reliable than flyme system customized based on Android, and has card-type life service with YunOS characteristics. Users can meet most requirements without downloading third-party applications, which is also very helpful to improve the running speed of the machine.
How about yunos system?
After several years' iteration, YunOS has changed from the original YunOS 1.0 to the present YunOS 6.0, and the users have also changed from hundreds of thousands at the beginning to the IOS mobile operating system, and the number of users is second only to Android and Apple, making it the third mobile operating system in the world, and this operating system is the mobile operating system independently developed by our China enterprise Alibaba. And now YunOS is not only a mobile phone operating system, but also an Internet of Things system. In addition to mobile phones, YunOS is also installed in TVs (Tmall Box, Alibaba Cloud TV), in-vehicle systems, Tmall Internet of Things voice speakers ... everywhere.
MeGoo system.
This system used all the cutting-edge technologies of Nokia at that time. It was born almost at the same time as IOS and Android, and it runs much faster than Android, which keeps pace with IOS.
However, Nokia, which was plagued by big enterprise diseases at that time, did not have the soil to breed MeGoo. Difficulties in transformation and procrastination in decision-making. The technical team wants to continue to build a closed-loop ecosystem similar to Apple's IOS. If successful, Nokia will continue to lead the next 10 year together with Apple and Google share the world.
Unfortunately, the top management of the enterprise objected, insisting that Saipan system still has the potential to continue mining. In the back-and-forth argument, MeGoo was finally strangled in the cradle. But the Nokia N9 mobile phone running the system witnessed Nokia's final glory. After the script, Microsoft Troy Maello led Nokia to embrace Microsoft, and then went to the grave step by step.
However, the MeGoo team did not dissolve, and then they raised funds to continue research and development, and finally built the current swordfish system. Unfortunately, time waits for no one, and no software vendors have cooperated with them to build an ecosystem. Now it has been reduced to only a few small European mobile phone manufacturers, and Indian mobile phone manufacturers are using the swordfish system.
Windows 2002 is the earliest, Nokia's touch screen is later than it, and it is still the smoothest and least memory-consuming. The real background operation is not to wake up the system. For example, if you open 12 software, 12 software will run at the same time. For example, if you open drawing while watching a movie, the movie will continue to play while you are drawing. You can reduce the picture on the mobile phone screen and draw it while watching it, just like operating it on the desktop.
Ppc didn't catch on because it was too advanced, because it was basically the same as windows98 system at that time, that is, Microsoft rudely installed the computer system on the mobile phone. For example, some small software such as mine sweeping and drawing on the computer can be directly copied to the memory card of the mobile phone for use. You're right. ppc phones can install programs on the memory card, so the memory occupation is very small.
The decline of ppc was because Microsoft executives thought that mobile phones were not as profitable as computer software at that time, and the licensing fee was really high at that time. Therefore, there is little support for the mobile phone system and no attention is paid to operability. Therefore, the audience of mobile phones is very small, and they are basically used by business people, which is also commonly known as business machines.
Practically speaking, Apple System is a battle in front of ppc.
Apple's iOS system comes from its own OSX, and the advantage of OSX is based on UNIX open source system. In fact, when you invest enough manpower and material resources, you can also make a system yourself. For example, Android is developed based on Linux, and so is Alibaba Cloud OS in China. But it's really hard for you to make a better system than Android and iOS now. No mobile phone manufacturer is willing to invest this cost!
In fact, according to the development prospect, the Android system is also expected to be optimized to be the same as the iOS system. After all, the daily use of Android models has been very good. You know, when I first bought Android or 2.3 system, it was difficult to use it, but it has improved obviously in recent years. I believe that the future software ecology will be improved, the ROM of manufacturers will be less rogue, and the performance of processors will be improved. Android and iOS are not a problem at the same starting line!
In fact, in some operations, the response speed of Android is better than that of iOS, but the durability of Android is not strong, and it is easier to get stuck after a long time. Of course, this is the characteristic of the system, and I believe this problem can be solved in the future.
It is not unprecedented to say that a system with high fluency is needed. For example, Microsoft's Windows Phone system is based on the Windows CE kernel. It can be said that this system has no other advantages except being very smooth, but a smooth mobile phone system is definitely not enough. Without the lack of supporting functions of the software ecosystem, your system is basically immobile, which was made by the giant Microsoft. So now a mobile phone manufacturer says it wants to be an operating system. Why can you overcome the problems that Microsoft can't?
It's no use arguing alone. Apple's OS was not made overnight. Even the problematic Android system, after so many years of iterative optimization, people can't say that it is perfect. Are you a perfect mobile phone manufacturer? What are the annual shipments of Android models and Apple? How much can your single manufacturer provide? It is not enough for you to try and make mistakes just by doing experiments!
However, it is not difficult to stop doing it. If there is an institution in China, it will be much less difficult for all manufacturers to invest in the group to keep warm, but innovation needs to pay a very high price like Ge's life. Are manufacturers willing to pay now? This is a big question mark. ...
At present, there are two mainstream mobile terminal systems, one is Google's Android system, and the other is Apple's iOS system.
Android system can't be stuck like iOS system for the time being, and it can only rely on Huawei's upcoming HarmonyOS system.
The biggest difference between Android and Apple's iOS system is the calling mechanism of the program.
The fragmentation of Android system is serious, which brings great difficulties to program development. The aging phenomenon of Android system is also serious, and the service life of devices is much lower than that of Apple's iOS system. Of course, Apple's iOS system is not without its shortcomings. Although the closed ecosystem ensures the quality of software programs, it cannot be compared with Android in quantity.
Although the cooperation between Google and Huawei has been interrupted, Huawei should be grateful to Google. After all, Huawei's HarmonyOS system is developed based on Android, and Huawei's HarmonyOS system, which stands on the shoulders of giants, will see further.
First, the problem of low execution efficiency of Android system.
Aiming at the problem of low execution efficiency of virtual machine in Android system, Huawei gives a solution.
Based on Android, Huawei can completely bypass the mechanism of virtual machines.
Then, the HarmonyOS system, which is also developed based on Linux kernel, is bound to have a greater improvement in execution speed.
Second, the experience of system optimization
Huawei has used Google Android system for many years and accumulated a lot of experience in system optimization.
If there really is a system beyond Apple's iOS, it depends on Huawei's HarmonyOS system!
Do you think Huawei's HarmonyOS system can be as free as iOS system?
I think it is necessary for me to answer this question, because I did have such doubts before, so I would like to talk about my views here. First of all, I think Android is still better. When you can completely clear your memory and then use the Android system reasonably, your running speed will definitely come up, which is also better.
Then comparing the two, I think ios is superior to the overall structure, not that the single structure of this system is good, but that the whole system is well coordinated, so I hope to solve such a problem through such an answer. Domestic systems should have great environmental fluency, which means it is good to increase the cleanliness of the overall operating environment.
Wp does work, but the ecology is gone, and the software has not been updated for a long time.