Health QR code
Then why is it difficult to realize the national unified management of health coding from the operational level?
First of all, different development ports make interconnection difficult. As we all know, on April 29th, 2020, the General Administration of Market Supervision issued a series of national standards for personal health information codes, and local governments have also developed health code management systems that meet the standards. However, the unification of technical standards does not mean the unification of relevant development enterprises in various provinces, cities and regions, nor does it mean the unification of functional technology customization, and the development ports have their own owners, resulting in the existence of various health codes in various regions. For example, Guangdong code, Jiangxi code, Zhejiang code, Beijing health treasure and so on. When you enter a certain place, the health codes in other places are useless. You should re-register and use the local health code. At best, it is precise prevention and control. Scientific prevention and control is conducive to local epidemic prevention and control management; The worst case is a waste of resources, fragmented and inconvenient for the government.
Health QR code
Secondly, different management and control standards make unified management difficult. At the national level, although the list of medium and high-risk areas is released in time every day, the specific control standards of different provinces, cities and regions are completely different. There is control pressure from local governments, and the control measures introduced by local CDC are not the same. Some areas should be isolated, and they will be given to red team when they come back from high-risk areas. Some areas only need to give the yellow code for home isolation, some areas only give the red code if it is accurate to the street community, and some areas only give the yellow code when passing by. Therefore, it is more difficult to manage health codes. Simply managing health codes at the national level is not conducive to the implementation of control standards in various regions, nor to the government's scientific overall planning of epidemic prevention and control. However, the strengthening of health code management, the lack of relevant national functional departments and personnel, and the convergence of system operation further restrict the prevention and control of classification.
Finally, there is a lack of regulatory laws and regulations, and there is a lot of room for abuse of power. Health code is the product of COVID-19 epidemic in 20 19. In just three years, the epidemic has entered normal control, but the lack of relevant laws and regulations and the lack of supervision system have led to a lot of room for abuse of power. Just like the recent incident in which many depositors went to Zhengzhou, Henan Province to communicate with village banks that it was "difficult to withdraw cash" and were shown a red card, it was the lack of typical regulatory laws and regulations that made management difficult, and it seemed that everyone had the right to operate. But in fact, decentralization does not mean abuse of power. The abuse of power cannot ignore the lack of laws and regulations, but is under the unified management of the state and lacks the support of relevant laws and regulations.
Health coding management is a double-edged sword. The purpose of our management is to cut off the epidemic, not to stab the people.