1, the title
The title must be commensurate with the content, pertinent, not a small topic or a big topic, not to mention the wrong topic. Good title can be clear at a glance, look at the title can know the content of the outline.
2. Abstract
Abstract is a summary of the content of the paper, including four parts: background information, questions, objectives of the study, experimental design and methodology, results, interpretation and conclusions. Generally, reviewers will decide whether the abstract is of interest or worth the time to review the manuscript based on the contents of the abstract, therefore, authors must not be sloppy in writing the abstract.
3, keywords
SCI thesis keywords are acronym references, these acronyms are bound to be high in the text of the repetition rate, categorization or list of keywords extracted will make the paper structure clearer. The setting of keywords is usually 3~5.
4, preface
As with general scientific and technical papers, the preface, also known as the introduction, is the part of the paper that will guide the reader to the subject, mainly describes the purpose and role of the review, summarizes the theme of the relevant concepts and definitions, briefly describes the selected topic of the historical background, the development process, the current situation, the focus of the controversy, the value of the application and the practice of the significance of the review, and can also limit the scope of the review. So that the reader has a preliminary impression of the theme of the review. This part of about 200 to 300 words.
5, the main part of the
The main part of the review of the length of the range is particularly large, short of about 5000 words, the long up to tens of thousands of words, the narrative is flexible and diverse, do not have to follow the same pattern, often by the author of the review according to the content of the design of their own creation. Generally according to the content of the main part of the more or less divided into several large parts, each part labeled with a brief and eye-catching subheadings.
(1) historical development: in chronological order, a brief description of the ins and outs of the subject, the development of an overview and the level of research at various stages.
(2) Review of the current situation: focusing on the current status of research at home and abroad, focusing on which problems have been solved, which problems have not yet been solved, and put forward possible ways of solving them; the focus of the current debate, comparing the similarities and differences of various views and theoretical explanations, and highlight the author's point of view; detailing the creative and promising theories and hypotheses, and citing arguments, pointing out possible development trends.
(3) Prediction of development prospect: through vertical and horizontal comparison, affirm the research level of the topic, point out the existing problems, put forward the possible development trend, point out the direction of research, and suggest the shortcut of research.
6, summary section
Summary section is also known as the conclusion, summary or conclusion. Writing a summary, according to the main part of the discussion, put forward a few concise language, the meaning of the exact comments and suggestions; can also be part of the main part of the main content of a brief summary, and put forward the author's own opinion, indicating that the author is in favor of what, against what; for the length of a smaller review, you can not list a separate summary, only in the main part of the content of the content of the discussion is complete, with a few words on the full text of the highly summarize.
7, references
References are the original material of the review. Is also the basis of the review, therefore, have and list enough references is particularly important. In addition to showing respect for the cited author's labor and show that the cited information has its scientific basis, but more importantly, for the reader to explore the subject provides clues to find relevant literature.
Expanded
The characteristics of the medical review:
①Comprehensive: the review should be "vertical and horizontal", not only to the development of a particular topic as a longitudinal line, reflecting the current progress of the subject; but also from the unit, the province, the country to foreign countries, horizontal comparison. Horizontal comparison. Only in this way, the article will occupy a large amount of material, after comprehensive analysis, generalization and organization, digestion and identification, so that the material is more concise, clearer, more hierarchical and more logical, and then grasp the development of the topic of the law and predict the trend of development.
② commentary: refers to a more specialized, comprehensive, in-depth, systematic discussion of a particular aspect of the problem, the content of the synthesis, analysis, evaluation, reflecting the author's views and insights, and with the synthesis of the content of the whole. Generally speaking, the review should have the author's point of view, otherwise it will not be a review, but a manual or lecture.
③Advanced: the review is not to write the history of the development of the discipline, but to collect the latest information, access to the latest content, the latest medical information and scientific research trends in a timely manner to the reader. The review should not be a list of materials, but to personally read and collect the material, to summarize, summarize, make comments and valuation. And draw important conclusions from the literature provided.