Instrument calibration qualification how to test

1. Enterprises themselves on the calibration of measuring instruments to what conditions

First, the necessary conditions for calibration or verification of measuring instruments

Enterprises and institutions in scientific research, production and service provision, especially in the process of inspection and testing to use a large number of measuring instruments, such as special calipers, dial gauges, micrometers; the production process of feeding scales, the process of monitoring the monitor, the pressure vessel, Pressure piping on the pressure gauge, flow meter, finished product testing to the power meter; production and inspection **** with the measuring instruments and measuring instruments equipped with mandatory verification of measuring instruments and computer software and so on. In accordance with GJB9001A-2001 standard 7.6 provisions of the two requirements: First, the measuring instruments are used in the monitoring and measurement process equipment; Second, the measuring instruments to monitor and measure the results of the product (or service) in line with the identified requirements to provide evidence. At the same time to meet the above two conditions, the need for calibration or verification.

Second, the difference between calibration or verification of measuring instruments

"Calibration" and "verification" is to ensure the accuracy of the value of two different ways and means. Calibration and verification from the traceability, they are the same, but from the legal effect, they are different. GJB9001A-2001 standard 7.6 clause a) requirements: against the traceability to international or national standards of measurement standards, if necessary, measuring equipment should be in accordance with the specified time interval or before use for calibration or verification. The word "or" in the standard establishes a parallel and optional relationship between calibration and verification. Under the premise of meeting the laws and regulations, enterprises and institutions can choose their own methods of verification or calibration for different situations.

Calibration is a voluntary traceability behavior of the enterprise, not mandatory, the enterprise can be calibrated on their own, but also can be entrusted to an external agency for calibration. The result of calibration is a calibration certificate or calibration report, the report does not judge the qualification of measuring instruments, generally is not a technical document with legal effect. The verification belongs to the national mandatory law enforcement behavior, the results of the verification must be sent to the inspection of measuring instruments, instruments and equipment to make qualified or not, when the results are qualified, then issued a certificate of verification, unqualified will be issued to the unqualified notice, the results of the verification has the force of law.

Belongs to the mandatory verification of measuring instruments must meet two conditions: First, the instrument is included in the national mandatory verification of the work of the meter directory; Second, the measuring instruments must be used for trade settlements, safety and security, medical and health care, environmental testing for specific purposes. For trade settlement, safety and security, medical and health, environmental testing purposes other than measuring instruments, such as scientific research, production, business management with measuring instruments, generally in accordance with the non-compulsory verification of measuring instruments for management and control.

2. What qualifications are needed to do instrument calibration

China's measurement of the 1980s when the law promulgated by the country has not yet "measurement calibration", only "measurement verification", so the State Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine on March 19, 1999, the State Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, the State Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, the State Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine. Issued by the State Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine on March 19, 1999, "on the use of non-compulsory inspection of measuring instruments used by enterprises in accordance with the law of the independent management of the announcement" stipulates that: enterprises use "non-compulsory calibration of measuring instruments for the verification cycle, by the enterprise according to the actual use of measuring instruments in line with the principles of science, economy and accuracy of the value of the self-service determination. Non-compulsory verification of measuring instruments by the enterprise according to the needs of production and scientific research, you can decide on their own in the unit verification or sent to other metrological verification institutions, testing, testing, any unit shall not interfere."

The so-called non-compulsory calibration of measuring instruments, including the internal production process control, quality inspection and other measurement equipment, these measurement equipment for verification or testing (can be understood as the current calibration), sent outside the inspection / school or internal inspection / school, inspection / school cycle, are "by the enterprise according to law, independent management ", "self-defined" and "self-determination", "any unit shall not interfere". On the measurement standard assessment of the specification is required to "enterprises and institutions of the highest standard of measurement" must be built and accept the assessment, for internal calibration similar to the standard of measurement of "measuring equipment" does not require mandatory construction and acceptance of the standard of measurement assessment.

"Zhejiang Provincial Measurement Management Regulations" provides that the community to provide metrological verification and metrological calibration services should be built and accept the measurement of standard assessment is reasonable, because some of the community to carry out verification/calibration services using measuring equipment means that it becomes a "social public standard of measurement, the social public standard of measurement must be subject to the assessment of the measurement of standards. The "regulations" provide that "enterprises and institutions" can establish the unit to use the measurement standard for internal calibration "only in accordance with the provisions of the Measurement Law," the highest measurement standard should be measured by the measurement The competent authorities to assess the qualification", which are reasonable and legal. As long as enterprises and institutions, although the internal calibration but not the establishment of "the highest measurement standard of enterprises and institutions", of course, is not mandatory to accept the measurement standard assessment. However, the internal calibration of the use of measuring equipment must be traceable to the statutory measurement of technical institutions, which is to ensure the traceability of the bottom line. Because in those days there is no domestic "calibration" term, testing, inspection, comparison, experiment, laboratory, calibration, verification, etc. are actually "measurement" of a kind, only verification is specifically for measuring instruments measurement activities, calibration can be for the measurement of equipment measurement activities, can be Calibration can be for the measurement of equipment measurement activities, can also be for the measurement of product activities, the rest are for the product (measurement equipment manufacturing process is considered to be the product before leaving the factory) of the measurement activities. Therefore, at that time, the proposed "test" of measuring instruments can be understood as "calibration".

Currently, with the term "calibration", generally for the measurement of in-use measuring equipment measurement activities will no longer use "test" and use "calibration". If the manufacturing process of measuring equipment for measurement, should still use the "test", "inspection", do not use "calibration". Homemade special gauges in the manufacturing process should be issued test reports rather than calibration certificates, once put into use, from the first measurement confirmation, including future periodic measurement confirmation, should be issued "calibration report", measurement confirmation by the measurement confirmation staff based on the results of the calibration results and the measurement process of the measurement requirements for the comparison of the results of the measurement confirmation, issued by the Measurement confirmation mark.

According to the current rules, the CNAS qualification can be oriented to the community to carry out calibration business, which belongs to the supply and demand side of the business contract within the matter, a willingness to fight a willing, as long as the willing party willing to do so on no problem.

According to the regulations to provide verification/calibration services to the community must be *** measurement of the administrative departments based on JJF1069 assessment of qualified statutory measurement of technical institutions or authorized measurement of technical institutions. Only obtained CNAS accreditation can only prove that the laboratory's calibration capabilities, if the non-statutory measurement of technical institutions or non-authorized measurement of technical institutions to provide measurement and calibration services to the community "is not permitted", refers to the calibration of the two sides of the act is not protected by measurement law. As a result of the dispute is not protected by the measurement law, then how to resolve such disputes? Should be based on the contract law and consumer protection law, should be depending on who violated the contract, whether the service provider to provide defective services for adjudication.

"Mutual trust between the two sides, there is a contract, that is, there is no CNAS qualification is also possible", if "the contract stipulates that the service of Party B shall obtain the CNAS qualification qualification, issued by the calibration certificate shall have the CNAS logo", then Party B If "the contract stipulates that the service provider shall obtain CNAS qualification and the calibration certificate issued shall have CNAS mark", then Party B has provided a calibration certificate without CNAS mark, or issued a certificate with CNAS mark but not actually recognized by CNAS, which is a defective service and a breach of the contract. Of course, Party A knows that Party B does not have CNAS accreditation, and for some purpose to voluntarily accept the counterfeiting behavior, but also should bear the legal responsibility for its violation.

In short, CNAS accreditation is a third-party notary's recognition of competence, not qualification recognition. Only with proof of accreditation can you be protected by the relevant laws. Without accreditation, but with proof of competence, you can be trusted by your customers and have a higher level of security. Neither the qualification recognition nor the ability to recognize the party must rely on it, that is the power of the party, but all the adverse consequences arising from the party to assume the same responsibility it should bear.

9000 certification, as well as the three C certification, etc., recognized CNAS qualification qualification calibration certificates, but not recognized test certificates is the correct approach. As we all know, calibration activities are specialized and only for measuring instruments; calibration activities can contain measuring instruments, including all measuring equipment, but also for the product; testing, inspection, experimentation and other activities are for the product, measuring equipment in the factory belongs to the manufacturing process of the product, and therefore also applies to the manufacturing of measuring equipment. Measuring equipment once put into the market, especially after the use is no longer a product but the authentic measurement equipment, it can only perform calibration activities, which belongs to the measurement instruments can also be implemented verification activities, especially a small part of the implementation of mandatory verification activities, but can not be implemented test.

3. Instrument internal calibrator what qualifications are needed, the factory can be trained within the certificate there is no relevant information to draw on

1. National Certification and Accreditation Administration (CNCA) recognized internal calibrator qualification certificate. 2. not issued by the National General Certificate, the factory internal training can only be used within the factory. 3. Course Outline I. ISO9000 Family requirements on how to manage measuring instruments, instruments, meters (22 practical requirements) Second, calibration reports, calibration reports, mandatory calibration reports, test reports, internal calibration reports and the meaning of the difference? Third, the requirements of laws and regulations related to measuring instruments. (Measurement management basics) measuring instruments: instruments, meters, gauges, etc.) Note: Summary of relevant experience V. By what means can the enterprise traceability of the relevant quantitative value to national standards (national calibration protocols), international standards? Six, the enterprise in the preparation of internal calibration standards need to consider which basic requirements? Seven, the enterprise to carry out new projects for measuring instruments will not operate how to do? (Relevant experience requirements) Eight, measuring instruments, calibration cycle how to determine? Nine, what is the mandatory verification of measuring instruments? Enterprise which measuring instruments for mandatory verification? Scope? (Compulsory calibration: the relevant national laws and regulations do not allow enterprises to carry out calibration, internal calibration of measuring instruments) Ten, the customer to the unit for the audit of the relevant issues raised by the general FAQs (examples raised by each training participant) Eleven, on-site practical exercises: (with three examples of measuring instruments: vernier calipers, micrometers, percentile tables, how to convert the national calibration procedures into internal calibration procedures of the operating procedures: (including calibration, debugging, repair, etc.) Twelve, after passing the examination, issued by the internal calibrator induction certificate. (Photos required) xiii. Teachers to provide the purchase of national calibration protocols, measuring instruments, repair-related tools, abrasive units, etc. purchase information! Information on the relevant national testing and authorization agencies!

4. measurement calibration staff need to have the qualifications of which

Do instrument calibration needs to be calibrated according to the level of the instrument, to the appropriate measurement of the Bureau (local or higher level) to declare that the measurement of the Bureau of the standard instrumentation you use, and the workers to carry out the assessment, qualified after the issuance of a unit of qualification certificates, and the workers of the operating license.

5. glass instrument calibration qualification certificate how to obtain

(Technical Supervision Bureau issued glass instrument calibration certificate) need to the national standard metrology training certificate

6. instrument calibration organizations need to be what qualifications

Thermal instrument calibration: copy

Constant temperature and humidity machine, temperature and humidity meter, salt spray machine, oven, glass thermometer, Infrared thermometer, low-temperature box, furnace temperature tester, multi-point collector, yellowing resistance tester, soldering iron thermometer, environmental test chambers, cold and hot shock tester, temperature tour tester, washing machine, environmental test chambers and so on;

Boro Instrument Calibration

7. How to apply for an instrument calibration certificate on the Internet

There are several ways

One according to the calibration regulations

Secondly, according to the manual of the equipment

Thirdly, according to the requirements of the production process

Fourthly, some special standard requirements, such as customer standards industry standards

8. How to qualify for the glass instrument calibration

Is there such a test? I've never heard of a specialized eh.

shsjec

yzpsdq.cn

gkzhan/st29043

9. calibration/inspection qualification ability to confirm the certificate how to test

Every year the State General Administration of Inspection and Quarantine will be organized by the Inspection and Quarantine personnel qualification examination, you can choose the direction you want to test enrollment to participate in the pass, can get the appropriate certificate You can choose the direction you want to take the test to register to participate in, after passing the certificate can get the corresponding certificate.

10. calibration of measuring instruments and instruments need to qualify

China's metrological law in the 1980s when the promulgation of the country has not yet been "measured calibration" said that only the "measurement of calibration", so the State Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the 1999 March 19 issued by the State Administration of Quality Supervision "on the use of non-compulsory inspection of measuring instruments used by enterprises in accordance with the law of independent management of the announcement" stipulates that: enterprises use "non-compulsory calibration of measuring instruments for the verification cycle by the enterprise according to the actual use of measuring instruments, in line with the principles of science, economy and accuracy of the principle of self-determination. Non-compulsory verification of measuring instruments by the enterprise according to the needs of production and scientific research, you can decide on their own in the unit verification or sent to other metrological verification institutions, testing, testing, any unit shall not interfere."

The so-called non-compulsory calibration of measuring instruments, including the internal production process control, quality inspection and other measurement equipment, these measurement equipment for verification or testing (can be understood as the current calibration), sent outside the inspection / school or internal inspection / school, inspection / school cycle, are "by the enterprise according to law, independent management ", "self-defined" and "self-determination", "any unit shall not interfere". On the measurement standard assessment of the specification is required to "enterprises and institutions of the highest standard of measurement" must be built and accept the assessment, for internal calibration similar to the standard of measurement of "measuring equipment" does not require mandatory construction and acceptance of the standard of measurement assessment.

"Zhejiang Provincial Measurement Management Regulations" provides that the community to provide metrological verification and metrological calibration services should be built and accept the measurement of standard assessment is reasonable, because some of the community to carry out verification/calibration services using measuring equipment means that it becomes a "social public standard of measurement, the social public standard of measurement must be subject to metrological standard assessment. The "regulations" provide that "enterprises and institutions" can establish the unit to use the measurement standard for internal calibration "only in accordance with the provisions of the Measurement Law," the highest measurement standard should be measured by the measurement The competent authorities to assess the qualification", which are reasonable and legal. As long as enterprises and institutions, although the internal calibration but not the establishment of "the highest measurement standard of enterprises and institutions", of course, is not mandatory to accept the measurement standard assessment. However, the internal calibration of the use of measuring equipment must be traceable to the statutory measurement of technical institutions, which is to ensure the traceability of the bottom line. Because in those days there is no domestic "calibration" term, testing, inspection, comparison, experiment, laboratory, calibration, verification, etc. are actually "measurement" of a kind, only verification is specifically for measuring instruments measurement activities, calibration can be for the measurement of equipment measurement activities, can be Calibration can be for the measurement of equipment measurement activities, can also be for the measurement of product activities, the rest are for the product (measurement equipment manufacturing process is considered to be the product before leaving the factory) of the measurement activities. Therefore, at that time, the proposed "test" of measuring instruments can be understood as "calibration".

Currently, with the term "calibration", generally for the measurement of in-use measuring equipment measurement activities will no longer use the "test" and use "calibration". If the manufacturing process of measuring equipment for measurement, should still use the "test", "inspection", do not use "calibration". Homemade special gauges in the manufacturing process should be issued test reports rather than calibration certificates, once put into use, from the first measurement confirmation, including future periodic measurement confirmation, should be issued "calibration report", measurement confirmation by the measurement confirmation staff based on the results of the calibration results and the measurement process of the measurement requirements for the comparison of the results of the measurement confirmation, issued by the Measurement confirmation mark.

According to the current rules, the CNAS qualification can be oriented to the community to carry out calibration business, which belongs to the supply and demand side of the business contract within the matter, a willingness to fight a willing, as long as the willingness of the party willing to do no problem.

According to the regulations to provide verification/calibration services to the community must be *** measurement of the administrative departments based on JJF1069 assessment of qualified statutory measurement of technical institutions or authorized measurement of technical institutions. Only obtained CNAS accreditation can only prove that the laboratory's calibration capabilities, if the non-statutory measurement of technical institutions or non-authorized measurement of technical institutions to provide measurement and calibration services to the community "is not permitted", refers to the calibration of the two sides of the act is not protected by measurement law. As a result of the dispute is not protected by the measurement law, then how to resolve such disputes? Should be based on the contract law and consumer protection law, should be depending on who violated the contract, whether the service provider to provide defective services for adjudication.

"Mutual trust between the two sides, there is a contract, that is, there is no CNAS qualification is also possible", if "the contract stipulates that the service of Party B shall obtain the CNAS qualification qualification, issued by the calibration certificate shall have the CNAS logo", then Party B If "the contract stipulates that the service provider shall obtain CNAS qualification and the calibration certificate issued shall have CNAS mark", then Party B has provided a calibration certificate without CNAS mark, or issued a certificate with CNAS mark but not actually recognized by CNAS, which means it has provided a defective service and violated the provisions of the contract. Of course, Party A knows that Party B does not have CNAS accreditation, and for some purpose to voluntarily accept the counterfeiting behavior, but also should bear the legal responsibility for its violation.

In short, CNAS accreditation is a third-party notary's recognition of competence, not qualification recognition. Only with proof of accreditation can you be protected by the relevant laws. Without accreditation, but with proof of competence, you can be trusted by your customers and have a higher level of security. Neither the qualification recognition nor the ability to recognize the party must trust it, that is the power of the party, but all the adverse consequences arising from the party should also bear its responsibility.