Normally, after a normal delivery, a young woman can't get pregnant until half a year later for health reasons. And the cesarean section of the interval time is longer, have to two years after the child. This is basic common sense and must be understood.
Recently, there was a story on the Internet. It is said that a woman surnamed Lu in Chongqing after giving birth to a child, only after four months, and then pregnant, and there are two months of pregnancy. The new company, which had only been on board for a month, decided to fire her, believing that she had come to cheat on her welfare benefits.
From time to time, the woman could have been pregnant before she joined the company. But with only a month to go, it's hard to tell if you're pregnant right away. This is because some people have irregular menstrual periods and postponements are common. Only after 40 days will there be a pregnancy reaction. The real situation is only clear to her.
Women who have experienced childbirth will know that the body is very weak after giving birth, otherwise there would not have been sitting in the moon. Ms. Lu was pregnant again two months after the birth of her first child. It is difficult for the average person to understand her behavior. Going for a job while breastfeeding and pregnancy were intertwined. In the eyes of the workplace, this behavior may not find any other reason than cheating on benefits.
Women of childbearing age will always face difficulties when looking for a job. The employer is generally unwilling to take the one who has not given birth to a child. If you've had a child, you're afraid she's going to have another one. If she is older, it is difficult to find a suitable job. Anyway, how to do it, all blocked.
The company insisted on dismissing Ms. Lu is not unreasonable, first of all, she has a deceptive behavior; secondly, the company's workload is large, for fear that she can not handle. If an accident occurs during the work, the company will definitely suffer losses, and compensation is inevitable.
If the woman knew she was pregnant, she still hid it and came out to look for a job. This is not only the health of their own irresponsible, and there is a problem with the character. Many employers are not willing to accept such dishonest, greedy people.
The matter was resolved, and both sides had no problem with it. The company would rather spend more money, but also to terminate the labor contract with Ms. Lu, which is also a last resort. Ms. Lu did not work much, but got 6 months of wages, but instead of making a profit. The company avoided the risk, stop loss in time, do not want to be tired of it, this is a normal move, there is no need to be verbally attacked.
Combined with the relevant information, I would like to talk about my views on this incident:
This incident, in fact, the company itself is a victim. According to Chongqing's local policies and regulations, all female workers who comply with the regulations on childbirth can enjoy up to 128 days of maternity leave. In addition to this, women are entitled to at least one hour of breastfeeding leave per working day after the end of their maternity leave.
In this case, the woman joined the training school after she had finished her maternity leave, and was still breastfeeding when she notified the school that she was pregnant again, just two months after she started her job. And this time, her pregnancy is only four months after she gave birth to her first child.
For companies, every new employee needs to be trained and mentored, and it can take months to get used to the new work environment.
I think this woman's behavior is not only harmful to her own body, but also to the future of the female population's job search.
Not only does the fact that this woman is breastfeeding make it difficult for the company to place her, but it is also clear to the eye that she will be on maternity leave for nearly six months after starting her job, and will continue to be on breastfeeding leave after that. For the company, it is equivalent to paying a year's salary for using her for only six months. With this wage bill, the company could have recruited someone much more capable than her, and clearly lost a lot of money in the process.
I think in the future, the company will have to rethink the background of the candidate before recruiting, and it will probably turn away candidates with the same or similar backgrounds.
First, the compensation.According to the company's urbane nature, a year forward from the current child's fourth month, which is about two months into the pregnancy, is barely enough to make sense, and it's possible that Ms. Lu is hiding the fact that she's pregnant, and even that she didn't even know it, when she started at the company.
The possibility that the company took the initiative to pay out double for less than half a year is slim to none. The assumption is that the slow half a year less than a year of the situation, in the case of dismissal behavior, still according to the consensus of the standard compensation (non-compensation), truthfully, on the three female employees is not very fair.
Even if the claim for compensation that there are two months of salary compensation, the claim to continue to fulfill the contract, the expected benefits are far more than this so-called consensus compensation 1 month + 2 months seems generous condolences and care.
The result of this negotiation may be due to Ms. Lu's lack of understanding + moral pressure (so many people said she was blackmailed) + lack of money + the long process of arbitration litigation and the outcome of no confidence + worry about the company's ultimate ability to compensate + worry about the impact on the health of the two children (which in fact may be the most important), to the company that is considered to be a cheaper result.
The company's unilateral dismissal line has no legal unilateral right to cancel, the law is bound to suffer.
This matter, if Ms. Lu is not right, who is at fault?
Said that this is Ms. Lu is wrong, first of all, zz is not correct, for the whole society to increase the labor force that is a great contribution, you because of a variety of reasons do not dare to have a child, someone to make sacrifices still have your turn to a keyboard warrior to spray?
So many people wrath, the reason seems to be justified, must be thinking of this Ms. Lu really caught a company to make a strong grip ah, the first child is certainly often have to take time off to go to maternity, the company did not dare to arrange for more work assignments and overtime, the natural other people's pressure is greater, the company's overall work efficiency is reduced. A child even if, just after two months immediately pregnant again, really angry ah! Maybe you also think that this company boss wrong ah, pay a lot of hair insurance cost is not low, work always also no one.
It is also possible that some people will say, "I'm going to start a company in the future, but I don't dare to hire a female employee of the right age!
Then think again, I say, this is the system is not perfect, resulting in our own people inside the first roll up! Businesses are also difficult to operate, three female workers also need to protect, but the existing system is to make female employees dare not have children, the enterprise more dare not easily recruit female employees.
Do not pull what, first to the company to do a few years with feelings, you give birth to a child boss is sure to take care of you, go to the birth of a child on the shelves who are not happy balabala, female employees to give birth to a child is not illegal, don't get a seemingly both sides have a step down to fool people to brainwash the rhetoric.
Combined with the current marriage rate and fertility rate and the exploding divorce rate, this contradiction will continue to arise if we don't address the root causes of women's concerns.
The maternity leave arrangements for the spouses of female workers, fifteen days enough to do what ah, a friend of mine to see their daughter-in-law hard to get themselves depressed, of course, now also good; the recruitment of three female employees, tax incentives are also arranged on the enterprise will naturally go to their own accounts, at least to ease the current situation, right?
The first paragraph is to speak objectively, the second paragraph is idle, the company said what happened to be responsible for can not afford, that is pure nonsense.
Last but not least, don't break the social security system, and continue to pay the social security system until you get the maternity allowance.
Chongqing Ms. Lu just gave birth to a child four months ago, after the month out of the job to an educational training institutions to work, just to work more than a month to find themselves pregnant again, the enterprise in the knowledge of Ms. Lu pregnant, rather than take responsibility, but also to dismiss Ms. Lu, the educational institutions to take into account the work of the labor intensity of the work of a large number of fetuses may have an impact, and I do not know whether the Ms. Lu intentionally fraudulent benefits, because the Ms. Lu from the last time to the last time to pay the social security benefits, but also the work of the company. The benefits, as Ms. Lu was just four months away from giving birth to her last child.
From the organization's point of view, they had no choice but to make this decision because they had to consider the management and operating costs of the organization.The company that Ms. Lu applied for should be a private enterprise, and in such an education and training institution, it is estimated that it is a kind of work as a teacher. If Ms. Lu can't go to work for about a year because of her pregnancy plus the delivery and feeding of the child, it is a great pressure for a private enterprise to bear, and invariably increases the cost because they have to find a replacement for Ms. Lu during her delivery and also have to bear the cost of Ms. Lu's pregnancy, which is a great pressure. The company also had to find a replacement for Ms. Lu during the birth of her baby, and had to bear part of Ms. Lu's salary and so on, which was inappropriate from their point of view, and so they made the decision to dismiss Ms. Lu rather than compensate her with three months' salary.
From Ms. Lu's point of view, she had to bear both the pressure of being dismissed and the pain of preparing for pregnancy, and suffered a double blow.Just gave birth to a child, only the past four months, and pregnant, which is basically certain to be an unplanned pregnancy, a bit of common sense are aware of the time of the second pregnancy at least half a year's interval is appropriate, but pregnant, there is not much to do, if you do not want to get rid of it, can only be hard to go to give birth to the child, but also to face the pressure of the child's future upbringing, it can be said that she is also very difficult, in accordance with the law, the enterprise is a pregnant woman is entitled to the same rights and benefits as a woman. Enterprises are pregnant women are protected, but the other side would rather breach the contract, but also want to dismiss Ms. Lu, then Ms. Lu can not pick each other's faults.
As we all know, as a woman on top of childbirth, in fact, is really not easy, on the one hand, to suffer because of the impact of childbirth on the work, on the other hand, but also to endure because of the birth of a child to bring the pain of the body, so the law only to give protection, but after all, childbirth is a big deal, since the decision to give birth to a child, then we have to think about it. , just like Ms. Lu in this case, since she wants to work and support her family, she should be prepared to take appropriate contraceptive measures and deal with the relationship between her family and her work. As a company, we have to take into account all the relevant issues when recruiting, and we have to be clear about the requirements of the recruitment process, and we have to be clear about the conditions of the company beforehand, and we have to take precautionary measures, so that both sides will not be able to develop into a situation like this.
We are not a European welfare society, the woman is in the interests of the damage to the school, just after giving birth to a child, recruited to work in a private school, two or three months later, the school found that the woman was pregnant, and dismissed her. The school and the woman to negotiate, agreed to compensate for three months of salary.
Why enterprises have prejudice against some female workers, it is because these shameless women, again and again, touch the interests of enterprises. This year's epidemic how difficult we all have eyes **** witnessed the closure of enterprises, layoffs, and even deducted half of the wages, the beautiful name and the company **** degree of difficulty. Business is not a nursing home, not to mention welfare organizations, there is no need to be merciful to those who can not create value. The rules of the market is so, the survival of the fittest, there is no such thing as fair or unfair. Especially in the country under the continuous advancement of education for all, the recruitment of high academic qualifications in big cities, you do not do there are people to do.
In fact, the first time I've ever seen a woman in a car, I've seen her in a car, and I've seen her in a car, and I've seen her in a car, and I've seen her in a car, and I've seen her in a car. This kind of woman should not occupy the post, give those young people in need, promote their employment. The experts who encourage childbirth every day are probably happy to have two children in a row. A woman who knows what she's doing will give birth to a second child right after she gives birth to the first one. If they are all as obedient as she is, then the population growth rate will be like a rocket.
Two children, when the time comes to bring up, can not ignore both education and growth. And moving to get pregnant, this family's baby-making program is very grasping ah, the husband is really like a hard-working ox, really amazing, for the population growth and contribute to their own power. But this kind of power, move down their own can, want to move the enterprise, it is still early. Concealing pregnancy, every day the labor law on the lips, want you to go there are 10,000 ways, in the end is not to take the money to go. This kind of woman, really ridiculous!
Let's not talk about the company's practice is not reasonable, is to stand in her own considerations, all think she is too risky. The first child is only four months old, which is pregnant again, or almost two months pregnant. It means that she had intercourse around two months ago and got pregnant again right after that. Her husband doesn't love her body, does she not love her body herself?
Generally speaking, after the birth, the doctor is recommended three months or even half a year before coitus, pregnancy is even more can not have. That is to take their own life joke, to say the least, if she really have any situation, you think her husband so monkey will not find again? Obviously not without looking!
Again, I think the company did the right thing. If I were the owner of the company, I would have preferred to pay her a few more months' salary and let her go.
Reason 1, she is obviously using the rights of pregnant women to her advantage. The first only 4 months, and now pregnant with the second child, although the national law is to protect the policy of pregnant women, but also can not be used in this way, if the normal pregnancy, it is not possible to dismiss the people, like her first child company did not dismiss, which is only four months old and then the second child, which company dare to use her ah? The company can't protect women's rights like this, it's like a charity organization. I'm also a woman, I want to get pregnant immediately go home a day do not stay in the company, I'm still afraid that I work to affect the development of the child it.
Reason two, is to worry about her health. You say in case she has to have a situation, the company can afford it? The company can afford to cancel the labor contract, she can find a TV station to make trouble, if she accidentally hurt when she went to work, will not be sued to the company's closure!
And it's because of these people that society is biased against women who are looking for work.
The first time I've ever seen a woman in a room, I've seen a woman in a room, and I've seen a woman in a room.
Whether an individual is doing the right thing or not may be judged differently by law and morality. But I'm worried that real businesses will be less and less because they have to take on a lot
Ms. Lu actively responded to the country's call to give birth to ②, contributing to the future of the Chinese nation should not be dismissed, but instead should be given a reward of 100,000 yuan [灵光一闪][灵光一闪][灵光一闪][灵光一闪]