Honstar Erke donated 50 million materials to Henan "questioner" that they have enough evidence to prove that Honstar Erke did not as they advertised to donate 50 million materials, so the attitude is very tough to let Honstar Erke and the One Fund to prosecute themselves. And Hongxingerke has long since made a staged response to the matter, proving that they do not have fraudulent donations.
On July 24, 2021, the network writer who questioned the donation of Hongxingerke, the 1st time to write an article questioning the Hongxingerke microblogging announced its own business to Henan flood donations of 50 million supplies. And according to the data already published on the network to confirm the authenticity of their own articles, Hongxingerke only donated 200,000 bottles of mineral water.
After that, Hongxingerke responded to the article written by the "skeptics". The response explains that Hongxingerke's donation is divided into two parts, one of which is 3 million in cash, and the other is 47 million in materials still in preparation for the distribution. Because the transportation road in Zhengzhou, Henan Province is not very smooth, so the donation of materials can not be completed in the first preparation.
One, questioning the 50 million donations of Hongxingerke is not the only oneHongxingerke because of the microblogging announced their own donation of 50 million supplies to the Henan floods, and got a wide range of attention from all walks of life, microblogging fan number has increased dramatically, and caused the consumer's crazy consumption. Honstar erke because of this incident, the store sales quickly inflated, in a short period of time reached a very substantial number.
In late July 2021, another article appeared on the Internet questioning Hongxingerke's donation of 50 million materials, that is, the self-media "porridge and pawnshop" published the article "donated 200,000 bottles of ice dew mineral water Hongxingerke, how to donate 50 million materials? The article was published by the self media "Porridge and Pawnshop". As a result, there are many people on the Internet who questioned whether Hongxingerke's donation is true, as well as those who attacked the author of the article.
After the article aroused the network questioning sound, Hongxingerke made an urgent response to this matter,response that Hongxingerke donated 20 million supplies through the cooperation with One Foundation and donated 30 million supplies through the Zhengzhou Charity Association. And these supplies are being prepared in full swing, so that netizens do not have to worry about, and do not have to question.
2, Hongxingerke was questioned donation is not the only donationHongxingerke every time in the microblogging to announce the amount of their own donations, and did not come up with real evidence to prove that they did donate their microblogging shown on the good money. It's not surprising that Hongxingerke's lack of rigor in the way they post their donations has drawn skepticism from the Internet.
Honstar's donations have been questioned, and not just in the case of the flooding in Zhengzhou, Henan province. The 10 million dollars of supplies donated by Honolulu during the Wuhan epidemic were also questioned by netizens. Because the "skeptics" in the Wuhan anti-epidemic donations of materials in the audit report, and did not check the donation data of the 10 million materials donated by Honstar Erke claim, so the question.
And Honstar Erke for the Wuhan epidemic donations in the audit report did not Honstar Erke donations of 10 million materials donated to the donation data to make a response. Response said, hongxing erke for wuhan epidemic donation material is through a three-year donation framework agreement to carry out. But the response did not publicize the content of the agreement.
Three, Hongxingerke donation material "questioner" let Hongxingerke and One Foundation sue their own purposeIn the "questioner" published an article questioning Hongxingerke donation 50 million material information can not be queried. "questioner" and the people around the phone was hit "burst". constantly someone or department, to the "questioner" and his side of the people sent questions. Asked the "questioner" is not on the network to spread the information unfavorable to the Hongxingerke.
In response to such telephone "harassment", some skeptics eventually chose to compromise. The author of the media mentioned above, "porridge and pawnshop", said publicly that the netizens have misinterpreted their own meaning, they never said that Hongxingerke has fraudulent donations. However, this does not mean that all the skeptics will choose to put the matter to rest to end the questioning of this matter.
Some of the "skeptics" insisted that their claims were not wrong and that their articles were based on publicly available information. The company's website is a great place to find out more about the company's products and services, as well as to learn more about the company's products and services. If Hongxingerke and the One Foundation said that the "skeptic" article is false content, please Hongxingerke and the One Foundation will be "skeptic" to the court to confirm.
Four, the donation of materials or funds is not like the way the "doubters" think"Doubters" question is not unreasonable, because he does not understand the donation of materials or funds of the specific modus operandi, but can only They can only rely on publicly available information to support their ideas, and the public information does give them a basis for their ideas.
There is a process of allocating donated funds and materials, and the process of donating is not just a matter of shipping all the money and materials to the affected areas, but a long and planned process.
Materials and funds are donated according to the requirements of the local Red Cross or charitable organizations. The purpose of this is to ensure that the donated materials and money are used where they should be, not just stuffed away, resulting in a waste or oversupply of materials.
In fact, there are many previous examples in our country that can be verified. By checking the evidence, the way and situation of the implementation of donations for disaster and epidemic areas can be clearly understood. Charities don't execute all at once for each donation and material, but have a percentage. For example, as of early February 2020, the utilization rate of donations for the Wuhan epidemic was more than fifty percent, and other data can be found in the relevant public information.
V. ConclusionHonstar Erke needs to improve the way it publishes its donations, because every donation will have an agreement or receipt, and even the bank water can be found, and the tax department will exempt this part of the tax, so the corporate financial report should also be shown.
As long as the company publishes the amount of its own donations and takes out the relevant facts, I believe that there will be no "skeptics" on the network for the company's donations.