Study in the U.S. guide to the U.S. colleges and universities named in principle
Study in the United States also found some details, most colleges and universities in the United States in the naming of school buildings and other facilities are principles. Let's take a look:
If named after a political figure, only deceased political celebrities are considered in principle.
In fact, it's not just political celebrities; American colleges and universities mostly favor deceased celebrities when naming buildings after people, which ensures that these celebrities are unlikely to do anything to embarrass the school in the future.
In addition, the public can make a more confident assessment of the lifetime accomplishments of a deceased celebrity, and naming a building after them tends to be much less controversial.
Of course, there are some people at every school who believe that no one person can be great enough to have a building named after him. However, even where there is opposition, a person who has died tends to cause less controversy.
It has to be a person of outstanding achievement and respect.
There are many kinds of respected people: for example, those who have made outstanding achievements in the sciences, humanities or the arts; those who have made outstanding contributions to the public **** service of society; and those who have given generously to the promotion of scientific research and development.
In recent years, however, more and more U.S. colleges and universities have been naming their buildings after people who have made major gifts to the school.
By contrast, fewer colleges and universities are naming buildings after prominent scholars, artists, or politicians.
Try to avoid changing the names of older buildings.
Many U.S. colleges and universities are faced with a situation in which an older building has a name, but in the course of renovating the building, a generous donor wants to have it named after him.
At this point, the school will generally try to avoid changing the name. Because once there is a precedent for changing the name, it will leave an impression that the naming is limited, there is a possibility of being modified, which may affect the willingness to donate. For this reason, some colleges and universities have adopted the compromise of keeping the original name and adding a new one.
If it is named after a donor, it is important to make sure that the amount of their gift is sufficiently weighted.
Most U.S. colleges and universities, both public and private, have faced financial constraints in recent years, especially after the financial crisis. Ensuring the quality of teaching is an expensive requirement, and with it comes high tuition fees. In addition, schools have had to repeatedly ask philanthropists for a helping hand as they have received less public ****ing aid. In return, the school promised to name the building after the donor.
In 2008, Hansj?rg Viss, a billionaire who runs medical equipment, donated $125 million to Harvard. It was the largest one-time gift in the university's history, and Harvard renamed and expanded its School of Bioengineering after Wise in response.
But how big of a 'donation' does it have to be to win naming rights? This is often a tricky question in real life. Some colleges and universities have stipulated that to win naming rights to an academic building, the endowment must be half or more of the cost of constructing the building. In the case of a new college, the proportion of the endowment amount to the annual budget of the college after its establishment is taken into account to ensure fairness in obtaining the naming. Of course, for a new college that is in dire need of fundraising, they will certainly have lower requirements for naming rights than those of established colleges with a strong reputation. However, as the school builds and develops, their requirements will gradually increase.
;