Government procurement evaluation experts have clear evaluation rights and obligations, their evaluation behavior by the relevant laws and disciplines, professional ethics constraints on the evaluation of the opinion to assume legal responsibility. Evaluation experts involved in government procurement activities is an important part of government procurement, its behavior directly affects the quality and effectiveness of the evaluation, determines the quality of procurement and service is optimal, whether the procurement needs are met, whether the procurement price is preferential, whether the supplier can obtain the winning bid or transaction qualification. In order to prevent power and money transactions, to prevent the evaluation experts and purchasers, suppliers and other phenomena of collusion, it is necessary to strengthen the supervision and regulation of the behavior of government procurement evaluation experts, clear evaluation expert's rights, obligations and responsibilities, standardize the behavior of evaluation experts, so as to ensure that the fairness of the government procurement activities, impartiality.
Government procurement evaluation expert behavior is an important part of the government procurement norms, reflecting the principle of openness, fairness and impartiality of government procurement activities, safeguarding the interests of the state and the interests of the social public ****, to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties involved in government procurement, and to prevent and control corruption from the source, has a very important role.
Obviously, the management of government procurement evaluation experts belongs to the scope of public **** management. And according to the basic content and requirements of the public *** management, the management of a public *** affairs should include at least the following: the main body of management (who manages), the management of the content (what), the management of the management of the ways and means (how to manage) and the management of the responsibility and effect (how to manage) and so on. In this regard, to improve the management of evaluation experts, we should start from the main body of management, management content, management methods and methods and management effects. Only to improve these management content and ensure that it is implemented in practice, in order to ensure that the evaluation of experts to correctly perform their duties, but also to achieve the principle of government procurement "three public".
Overall, since the promulgation of the "Government Procurement Evaluation Expert Management Measures", China's procurement expert evaluation work has made great achievements. This is mainly manifested in:
1, around the financial departments at all levels have established a pool of evaluation experts, and the basic implementation of the "separation of management";
2, expert evaluation of the basic maturity of the operating mechanism has been completed a large number of government procurement evaluation work
3, the vast majority of the evaluation expert The vast majority of evaluation experts can actively fulfill their duties, impartial evaluation, according to the law and policy evaluation of the appropriate winning supplier;
4, the financial sector can be based on laws and regulations to exercise the right to supervise, for illegal evaluation experts to give the appropriate sanctions, etc..
Second, the current government procurement evaluation expert management of the main problems and reasons for the analysis
We should also see that, with the constant changes in China's government procurement of political, economic and international environment, the continuous introduction of new laws and regulations and policies, as well as the continuous expansion of the scale of government procurement, the government procurement expert evaluation and management work has encountered a lot of problems. These problems even affect the fair evaluation of experts, and some even directly lead to the evaluation work is difficult to carry out normally. Specifically can be summarized as follows:
1. Government evaluation of experts in the management of the main body of their own, uneven levels. According to the "government procurement evaluation expert management measures" provisions, the financial sector at all levels in charge and supervise the establishment and operation of the evaluation expert pool. This means that the local financial departments should establish a more complete expert pool, while according to the local situation to monitor its operation, to ensure that the expert evaluation work is carried out normally. However, in practice, many places still exist in the same place of the centralized government procurement center and social procurement agencies to use different expert database. In other words, in addition to the expert pools established by the financial departments, social intermediary organizations also have their own expert pools. In addition to the government procurement evaluation expert pools under the responsibility of the finance departments at all levels, there are also expert pools for bidding on construction projects, expert pools for the procurement of drugs and medical equipment, and expert pools for the evaluation of scientific research fund projects, and so on. In this way, the same administrative level, different departments in charge of different public **** procurement expert evaluation pool. These are subordinate to different departments in charge of the evaluation of the expert pool for their own purposes. In the vast majority of the region, do not contact each other, do not communicate with each other, resulting in a huge waste of resources.