Huizhou's GDP is slightly higher than Jiangmen's. GDP is just an economic indicator, and it varies with the structure of the local economy. Jiangmen's fiscal revenue, bank deposits, total social sales and other economic indicators closely related to the public are higher than Huizhou.
South Guangdong City Level Review --- Comprehensive Review of Cities in Guangdong Province (Jiangmen is the 8th, Huizhou is the 9th)
JinYang.com 2007-05-08
The "Assessment Report on the Development of Urbanization in Guangdong Province (2006)" evaluates the comprehensive development level of urbanization in the 21 cities in the province. The report assesses the comprehensive development level of urbanization in the province, analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of each city, and compares and ranks them.
Shenzhen: The first in comprehensive development level
Advantage: As the "window" of the national reform and opening-up, Shenzhen is in the leading position in terms of the development level of urban agglomeration, the level of urban factor flow, the level of development of urban civilization, the level of urban living services, the quality of urban environment, and urban-rural integrated development. are in the leading position in the province. Among them, the proportion of urban population, land output rate of non-agricultural construction land, the density of highway network, the proportion of people with tertiary education or above in the household population, social security coverage, urban sewage treatment rate, and many other indicators ranked first in the province.
Deficiencies: per capita living space, the number of doctors per 1,000 people, and the proportion of environmental protection investment in GDP need to be strengthened.
Guangzhou: second in overall development
Advantages: as the political, economic and cultural center of the province, it is in the lead in terms of the level of development of urban agglomeration, the level of urban factor flow, the level of development of urban civilization, the quality of urban living services, and the quality of urban environmental construction. Among them, the added value of the tertiary industry accounted for the proportion of GDP, per capita turnover of goods, per capita expenditure on education, and the number of doctors per 1,000 people are in the first place in the province.
Deficiencies: deficiencies in per capita living space, environmental protection investment as a share of GDP, village planning and other aspects.
Zhuhai: third in overall development
Strengths: the quality of urban environmental construction has reached a high level, ranking second in the province. Other aspects are basically in the top six. Among them, foreign trade dependence, energy consumption of 10,000 yuan GDP, industrial sulfur dioxide emission compliance rate, and the number of doctors per 1,000 people are ranked in the top three.
Deficiencies: highway network density, public **** book collection, village planning and other aspects need to be improved.
Dongguan: fourth in overall development
advantages: first in the province in terms of the quality of urban living services and the ability of integrated urban and rural development. Among them, the rankings in terms of the level of urban agglomeration development, the level of urban factor mobility, the level of urban civilization development, and the quality of urban environment construction are closer to the overall rankings. In particular, the highway network density, per capita public **** book collection, per capita living area, annual per capita water supply, infrastructure investment as a proportion of GDP, social security coverage rate and other indicators ranked high.
Deficiencies: per capita turnover of goods, the number of doctors per 1,000 people, urban sewage treatment rate is relatively underdeveloped.
Foshan City: fifth in overall development
Strengths: It has reached a high level in integrated urban and rural development. Among them, the rankings of the development level of urban agglomeration, the development level of urban civilization, and the quality of urban living services are closer to the overall ranking.
Deficiencies: the level of factor mobility and the quality of urban environmental construction are relatively lagging behind, and the energy consumption of 10,000 yuan of GDP and the rate of industrial sulfur dioxide emission compliance are ranked outside the top 10.
Zhongshan City: Sixth in Comprehensive Development Level
Strengths: The ability of integrated urban and rural development has reached a high level, and the rankings in terms of the level of factor mobility in towns and cities, the level of civilization development in towns and cities and the quality of urban living services are relatively close to those of the comprehensive assessment. In particular, indicators such as the number of professional technicians per 1,000 people, the gas penetration rate, and the number of public ****transportation vehicles per 10,000 people have reached a high level.
Deficiencies: the proportion of added value of the tertiary industry to GDP, annual per capita water supply, and the number of doctors per 1,000 people need to be strengthened.
Shantou: Seventh in Overall Development Level
Strengths: As a central city in the eastern part of Guangdong, Shantou performs better in the level of development of town agglomeration, development of urban civilization, and construction of urban environment.
Deficiencies: The quality of urban living services and the development level of factor mobility need to be improved. In particular, indicators such as per capita turnover of goods, investment in education, per capita public **** green space area, and the penetration rate of new rural cooperative medical care, there is a big gap with the status of regional center city.
Jiangmen: eighth in overall development level
advantages: basically ranked in the seventh to ninth position in terms of the level of development of town agglomeration, the level of flow of urban factors, the level of development of urban civilization, the quality of life services in towns and cities, the quality of urban environment construction, and the ability of integrated urban and rural development. In particular, the completion rate of village construction planning, highway network density, per capita living area and other indicators ranked high.
Deficiencies: per capita turnover of goods, public **** book collection, environmental protection investment as a proportion of GDP is obviously insufficient.
Huizhou: ninth in overall development level
Strengths: better performance in the level of urban agglomeration development, the level of urban factor mobility, and the level of urban civilization development.
Deficiencies: The rankings in the quality of urban living services and the quality of urban environmental construction are closer to the comprehensive assessment level. Among them, there is an urgent need to pay attention to such aspects as the amount of per capita investment in public utilities in rural areas and the completion rate of village construction plan preparation.
Chaoshan: 10th in overall development level
Strengths: better performance in the development level of urban agglomeration, the development level of urban civilization, and the quality of urban living services.
Deficiencies: the level of urban factor flow and the quality of urban environment construction need to be strengthened. Among them, the proportion of infrastructure investment in GDP, per capita public **** green space area reached a high level, but the per capita gross domestic product, energy consumption of 10,000 yuan of GDP, industrial sulfur dioxide emissions to meet the standard rate and other issues are more prominent.