Xuzhou a city management section chief live at work with goods to attract hot discussion, this behavior is not a violation? Let's talk about it today!
He this practice is a disciplinary offense. I think at work with goods to play the network is not the right behavior. At present this section chief has been suspended to be investigated.
When you go to work, you do what you do at work, and when you get off work, you do something else. I think this section chief's behavior is incorrect. The time to go to work on the office, can not go to do other things, everyone is on the body of the responsibility, ordinary civil servants is to go to work on the job, off-duty time, no matter whether you live or how no one to care about you. This person is still a section chief, section chief is so dry work, then the bottom of the section members have to think about it? The first thing you need to do is to get your hands dirty!
This person said that the live broadcast is to pay back the money, because to give others guarantee owed 100,000 dollars, but also said that he is disciplinary, not illegal. I think he is too rampant, all know he is against the discipline, and still say it himself, just like showing off. It is obvious to see what kind of work attitude he usually has. No matter what kind of reason he has, live at work is not right, know what he did wrong and still so arrogant, I think his suspension and investigation is really the right thing to do. This time was reported is also a lot of people can not see, the eyes of the masses are bright.
I advise everyone to take this person as a warning, do not know that they do wrong still continue to be wrong. He first of all is a disciplinary offense, in the time he should work in the dry live, think of those flood relief, fight the epidemic of civil servants, this kind of civil servants only get money not to do the work really do not deserve to say that they serve the people. The second thing he did wrong was to blatantly say that he had violated discipline, but not the law. Perhaps some people will sympathize with him when they hear that he has to pay back the money before he goes on air, but they know that he has knowingly violated the law and is not repentant, which immediately generates anger, and this is called self-inflicted suffering. Other people reported, only to regret, do not do this kind of thing to make their own regret.
The above is my answer.