Article 1 In order to further standardize the city's housing construction and municipal infrastructure construction bidding evaluation activities, strengthen the integrity of the industry, to protect the quality and safety of the project, and improve the efficiency of the investment of construction funds, according to the "Chinese people's *** and the State Bidding Law," and other relevant laws, rules and regulations, combined with the actuality of the city, the development of this approach.
Second urban areas of the city (excluding Yiling District, the same below) must be bid in accordance with the law of building construction and municipal infrastructure projects (hereinafter referred to as construction projects) construction bidding evaluation activities, the application of this approach.
(a) the housing construction projects referred to in these measures, refers to all types of housing construction and its ancillary facilities and its supporting lines, pipelines, equipment installation projects and indoor and outdoor decoration works.
(ii) the municipal infrastructure projects referred to in these measures, refers to urban roads, public **** transportation, water supply, drainage, gas, heat, gardening, sanitation, sewage treatment, garbage disposal, flood control, underground public **** facilities and ancillary facilities, civil construction, piping, equipment installation projects.
Article 3 where the implementation of the construction project bidding activities in accordance with these measures, the bidder shall credit information as one of the conditions of the bidder, in the bidding documents set up a reasonable bidder credit rating requirements. Government investment and state-owned capital investment-based construction projects construction bidding shall select the credit rating of B and above to participate in the bidding.
Article 4 of the bidder shall be based on the national, provincial, municipal or industry construction departments issued by the relevant pricing basis and methods, according to the design and construction drawings to prepare the bidding control price. Bidding control price is appropriate as the highest bidding price published with the bidding documents.
Article 5 of the bidder shall, in accordance with the provisions of this method, combined with the size of the bidding project, the technical complexity, the degree of difficulty of construction, etc., in the bidding documents set out the specific bid evaluation criteria and methods. Among them:
(a) the use of comprehensive evaluation method, the winning bidder's bid shall meet the substantive requirements of the solicitation documents, and honesty evaluation, bidding price, construction program, and other comprehensive evaluation of the highest score. The bidder shall take into account the actual situation of the project, in the bidding documents to set a reasonable comprehensive evaluation criteria.
(ii) the use of evaluated reasonable low price method, the winning bidder's bid shall meet the substantive requirements of the solicitation documents, and the lowest evaluated bid price, but the bid price is lower than the cost of the exception.
Article VI of the bid evaluation activities should follow the "fair, just, scientific, merit" principle, based on the "Yichang City, the construction industry, comprehensive supervision system" in the information, according to the bidding documents specified evaluation methods and evaluation procedures in order to carry out the evaluation. Generally according to the following procedures:
(a) Preparation for bid evaluation;
(b) Preliminary evaluation of bidding documents;
(c) Detailed evaluation of bidding documents;
(d) Recommendation of the winning candidate.
In the process of evaluating tenders, the criteria and methods for evaluating tenders set forth in the bidding documents shall not be changed arbitrarily, and the criteria and methods for evaluating tenders that are not stipulated in the bidding documents shall not be used as the basis for evaluating tenders. Otherwise, the results of bid evaluation shall be invalid.
Article 7 members of the bid evaluation committee and personnel involved in bid evaluation activities shall not disclose the evaluation and comparison of bidding documents, the recommendation of the winning candidate and other circumstances related to bid evaluation.
Chapter II Preparation for Bid Evaluation
Article 8 Bid Evaluation Committee shall be formed by the bidder in accordance with law. Which requires detailed evaluation of the construction program construction bidding projects, the construction program and business bidding can be evaluated in groups.
Article 9 of the bid evaluation committee members should be aware of the bidding project before evaluating the bidding and the contents of the bidding documents. The bidder or its commissioned bidding agency shall provide the bid evaluation committee to evaluate the important information required and related data, including:
(a) the bidding documents;
(b) not in the opening of the bidding meeting on the spot rejection of the bidding documents;
(c) record of the opening of the bidding meeting;
(d) bidding control price (including the preparation of the description and the impact of the construction cost) (including preparation instructions and major construction programs affecting the cost of the project, etc.);
(v) various forms required for the evaluation work in accordance with the provisions of these Measures and the bidding documents.
Article 10 of the bid evaluation committee shall, without changing the substantive content of the bidding documents, according to the bidding documents set out in the preliminary evaluation, detailed evaluation of the bidding documents, one by one, arithmetic errors in the bidding documents, checking, comparison, screening and inventory (hereinafter referred to as the "clear bid"). Clear bidding work is generally done by the bid evaluation committee with the help of computer-aided bid clearing (evaluation) system, mainly including the following:
(a) conformity of the bill of quantities, including project code, project name, project characteristics, unit of measurement, quantity of work;
(b) non-competitive items are not calculated in accordance with the provisions of the bidding documents, including safety and civilization of the construction cost, fees, taxes and tentative amount of the bidder, tentative valuation of professional works, tentative valuation of materials, etc.;
(iii) the existence of items with negative quotations;
(iv) arithmetical calculation errors in the bidding quotations;
(v) the existence of items with serious imbalance in the quoted prices or the existence of misstatements, omissions, and duplicate quotations;
(vi) the composition of quoted prices of the main list of items using the Construction program is not feasible or technical measures for items quoted are seriously detached from the actual project;
(vii) other problems found in the bid clearing.
Article 11 of the bid clearing found in one of the following circumstances, by the bid evaluation committee more than half of the members of the examination and determination, as bidders collusion with each other bidding, their bidding documents for the abolition of the bid:
(a) different bidders bidding documents prepared by the same unit or individual;
(b) different bidders entrusted to the same unit or individual to handle bidding;
(c) different bidders bidding;
(d) different bidders bidding for the same unit or individual;
(e) different bidders bidding for the same unit or individual to handle bidding.
(C) the bidding documents of different bidders contained in the project management members of the same person;
(D) the bidding documents of different bidders are unusually consistent or bidding prices are regularly different;
(E) the bidding documents of different bidders are mixed up with each other;
(F) bidding deposits of different bidders are transferred from the same unit or individual account;
(F) bidding deposits of different bidders from the same unit or individual account Out;
(VII) other cases of collusive bidding as determined by the Bid Evaluation Committee.
Article XII of the Bid Evaluation Committee at the end of the bid clearing work shall form a written report on bid clearing. Clearance report shall not have any unfair, impartial principles of judgment or speculative conclusions. Its main contents generally include:
(a) the verification of bidding price and its arithmetic errors;
(b) the verification of bidder collusion bidding;
(c) the verification of the content of the formal evaluation;
(d) the verification of qualification evaluation information;
(e) the verification of the content of responsiveness evaluation;
(vi) Verification of bidder's integrity evaluation and project management organization personnel;
(vii) Suggested questioning issues.
Chapter III preliminary evaluation of tender documents
Article 13 of the preliminary evaluation of tender documents, including formal evaluation, qualification evaluation, responsiveness evaluation, clarification or correction. The bid evaluation committee shall carry out the evaluation according to the information in "Yichang City Construction Industry Comprehensive Supervision System", the bid clearing report and the bidding documents in order. If the bidder's bidding document is found to be unqualified or rejected, its bidding document will not be allowed to enter the next stage of evaluation, nor will it be allowed to enter the stage of detailed evaluation of bidding documents.
Article 14 Formal Evaluation refers to the evaluation of the bid evaluation committee on whether the bidding document delivery, sealing and signing are in accordance with the requirements of the bidding documents; the bidding documents require the bidder to submit the original information or electronic bidding documents, whether the information of the original information or electronic bidding documents is consistent with the information in the "Yichang City Comprehensive Supervisory System for Construction Industry" at the time of the deadline for bidding " in the information is consistent. If it does not meet the requirements for formal evaluation, its bidding documents shall be treated as invalid. The main contents of the formal evaluation shall include:
(i) whether the bidding documents are sealed by the bidding unit and signed by the person in charge of the unit; if there are regulations on the preparation and binding of the construction program (technical bid), whether it is in compliance with the prescribed requirements;
(ii) whether the electronic version of the bidding price is submitted in accordance with the requirements of the bidding documents; whether the paper version of the bidding price is stamped with the official seal of the preparation unit and the registered cost practitioner's Signature and seal;
(3) whether the bidder to participate in the bid opening meeting meets the requirements of the bidding documents;
(4) whether the bidder's business license, qualification certificate, safety production license and record certificate (except for certificates not required to be submitted by the bidding documents) is valid or whether it is consistent with the information in the "Yichang City, the comprehensive construction industry supervision system "
(e) Whether the information of the bidder and its proposed project management organization is consistent with the information in "Yichang Construction Industry Comprehensive Supervision System".
Article 15 adopts post-qualification projects, qualification examination conditions must be clearly stipulated in the bidding documents. The bidder in its bidding documents can not prove that it has or meet the requirements set out in the bidding documents, its bidding documents for the abolition of the bid. Qualification examination generally includes:
(i) whether the qualification grade and category of the enterprise conform to the provisions of the bidding announcement and the bidding documents;
(ii) whether the credit evaluation information of the enterprise conforms to the provisions of the bidding documents (based on the information disclosed by the competent department of the municipal construction administration at the time of the deadline for submission of bids);
(iii) whether the qualification, category and performance of the proposed constructor (project manager) Whether it is in accordance with the provisions of the bidding notice and the bidding documents;
(d) Whether the enterprise's performance of similar projects is in accordance with the provisions of the bidding documents;
(e) Whether the enterprise's financial status is in accordance with the provisions of the bidding documents;
(f) In case of the bidding of a consortium formed by two or more legal persons or other organizations (hereinafter referred to as consortium), whether the relevant conditions of the consortium's members meet the requirements of the bidding notice and the bidding documents. Requirements of the bidding notice and bidding documents, whether the consortium parties have signed *** with the bidding agreement, *** with the bidding agreement of the responsibility of each party is clear;
(vii) Whether the machinery and equipment to be used for the bidding project can meet the requirements of the bidding documents;
(viii) Whether the qualifications and performance of the proposed project management personnel are in line with the provisions of the bidding notice and the bidding documents;< /p>
(ix) the enterprise has not provided design or consulting services for the preliminary preparation of the project for this tender, except for the design and construction general contracting;
(x) the enterprise and the construction agent, bidding agent and supervisor of the project for this tender are not the same legal representative;
(xi) the enterprise and the construction agent, bidding agent and supervisor of the project for this tender are not holding or participating in shares, or serving or supervising each other;
(k) the enterprise is not holding or participating in shares, or serving or supervising each other;
(l) the enterprise is not holding or participating in shares, and is not holding or participating in shares, and is not holding or participating in shares. or shareholding, not serving or working with each other;
(xii) the enterprise is not in the state of being ordered to suspend business, the bidding qualification is canceled or the property is taken over, frozen and bankruptcy;
(xiii) in addition to force majeure, in the past year, there is no enterprise to give up winning the bidding or not be able to follow the provisions of the contract with the bidders, as well as due to the enterprise's inability to perform the contract, resulting in the contract was suspended;.
(xiv) in the process of evaluating the bid, the bid evaluation committee found that the bidder in this bidding whether there is falsehoods and other behaviors.
Article 16 responsiveness evaluation is the bid evaluation committee to evaluate whether the bidding documents substantially respond to the requirements of the bidding documents. Bidding documents in one of the following circumstances, as a failure to respond substantially to the bidding documents, the bidding documents for the abolition of the bid:
(a) not in accordance with the requirements of the bidding documents to provide bidding security or the provision of security defective;
(b) not in accordance with the prescribed format, incomplete or the key elements of the handwriting is blurred, illegible, resulting in the bidding documents do not respond to the requirements of the bidding documents, or can not lead to the bidding documents in substance. requirements of the bidding documents, or lead to the inability to evaluate the substantive content of the bidding documents;
(iii) the bidding documents set forth in the bidding project schedule, quality, safety, civilized construction commitments and financial penalties fail to meet the requirements set forth in the bidding documents;
(iv) the bidding documents are accompanied by conditions unacceptable to the bidders, or to the contractually agreed upon the bidder's rights and the obligations of the bidder;
(v) the bidder submits two or more bidding documents with different contents, or quotes two or more prices for the same bidding item in a single bidding document without declaring which of the quotes is valid;
(vi) the total bidding price is higher than the bidding control price;
(vii) the bidding price is higher than the bidding control price;
(viii) the bidding price is lower than the bidding control price;
(viii) the bidding price is lower than the bidding control price;
(ix) the bidding price is lower than the bidding control price. The project code, project name, project characteristics, quantity of work and unit of measurement of the bill of quantities to be changed and have an impact on the price calculation;
(viii) any rate in the bidding price is negative or negative quote;
(ix) the bidding price of safety and civilization of construction costs, fees, taxes are not in accordance with the prescribed standards;
(x) the bidding price of the provisional estimate of the material
(x) the bidding price of materials, temporary valuation of professional engineering, temporary gold is not in accordance with the standards set out in the bidding documents;
(xi) does not comply with the bidding documents specified in the other substantive requirements.
Article XVII of the bid evaluation committee should be determined as a substantial response to the requirements of the bidding documents in the bidding documents are unclear, inconsistent expression of the same type of issues or obvious textual and arithmetic errors and other matters require the bidder to make clarifications, explanations or corrections, but shall not be asked to the bidders with suggestive or inducing questions or to the bidder to make clear the bidding documents of the omissions and errors.
Article 18 The clarification, explanation or correction of the bidder's bidding documents shall be made in writing and shall not go beyond the scope of the bidding documents or change the substantive contents of the bidding documents.
The bidder refuses to make clarification, explanation or correction of the bidding documents in accordance with the requirements, the bid evaluation committee may in the detailed evaluation of the bidding documents in accordance with the provisions of the bidding documents to the detriment of the bidder's evaluation or its bidding documents for the abolition of the bidding process.
Article 19 of the bidding price there are arithmetic errors, in addition to the bidding documents, generally in accordance with the following principles of correction:
(a) comprehensive unit price and the product of the list of quantities of work is inconsistent with the total price, the consolidated unit price shall prevail;
(b) if the consolidated unit price has an obvious decimal point misplaced, the total price shall prevail, and the consolidated unit price shall be amended;
(iii) When the consolidated unit price in the bill of quantities of component works and the consolidated unit price in the consolidated unit price analysis table are inconsistent, the latter shall prevail and the former shall be revised;
(iv) When the unit price of materials comprising the consolidated unit price is inconsistent with that in the price list of major materials in the bidding quotation, the unit price in the price list of major materials in the bidding quotation shall prevail and the corresponding consolidated unit price and combined price;
(v) if the combined price and amount are wrongly accumulated, the accumulated correction can be made;
(vi) if the amount expressed in figures and the amount expressed in words are inconsistent, the amount expressed in words shall prevail;
(vii) in case of omission of an item from the bidding quotation, the cost of the omitted item is regarded as having been allocated to other items and will not be revised.
Article 20 of the bidding price amended in accordance with the provisions of the bidding documents, and confirmed by the bidder can only be used as the basis for detailed evaluation of the bidding documents, but shall not be amended to change the total bid price indicated in the bidder's bidding letter.
If the Bidder does not accept the corrected quotation, his Bidding Document shall be rejected and his Bid Security or Bid Bond shall be forfeited. If the cumulative absolute error of the corrected arithmetic error exceeds ±1% of the total bid price, the bidding document will be rejected.
Article 21 of the bid evaluation committee may require the bidder's technical or project manager, the bidding price preparation staff on the bidding documents involved in the professional and technical and price preparation issues for the defense, but the defense should be carried out in a way that does not meet each other.
Article 22 The bid evaluation committee shall analyze and determine the reasonableness of the composition of the bidding price according to the bid clearing report in the order of the total valid bid price from low to high. One of the following circumstances, by more than half of the evaluation committee vote, as unreasonable offer items, in the detailed evaluation stage in accordance with the bidding documents for quantitative evaluation of the prescribed methods:
(a) constitutes the structure of the project entity of the main list of items quoted in one of the following circumstances:
1, when the amount of work list calculation rules and unit of measurement and the amount of fixed amount calculation rules and the unit of measurement are identical, the comprehensive list of items quoted in the list of items quoted by the bidding committee shall be analyzed and determined. Measurement unit is identical, its comprehensive unit price component of the priced amount of work is less than the list of the project;
2, labor, machinery and shift usage is not in accordance with the current consumption quota or the amount of the main material is less than the net amount of the entity project, and can not explain the reasonable grounds;
3, the unit price of the labor day is less than the local minimum wage standard;
4, The price of major materials, machinery bench prices and construction project cost management agency where the project is issued by the information price or bidding control price taken in the price of serious deviations, and can not explain the reasonable grounds;
5, the list of items quoted in the composition of the omission or increase in the content of the project resulting in a serious deviation from the consolidated unit price with the bidding documents publicly bidding control price set out in the consolidated unit price, and can not explain the reasonable grounds. Explain the reasonable grounds.
(ii) technical measures project offer in one of the following circumstances:
1, the composition of the bidding price used in the program and the bidding documents used in the construction program is inconsistent or infeasible;
2, there is a serious omission or the level of the offer deviates significantly from the actual project;
3, their own increase in the measures of the project offer and measures to be provided by the tenderer and repeat Project list duplication.
(C) other items quoted in one of the following circumstances:
1, the bidder to increase other items for quotation;
2, the bidding documents do not specify the provisional price of specialized works, materials and provisional price and its matching content, the bidder to the general contracting service fee quoted.
Article 23 of the bid evaluation committee in the evaluation process of dissent, according to the principle of minority to majority voting.
In addition to laws, regulations, rules and bidding documents expressly provided for the invalid bid, the bid evaluation committee shall not be invalid or invalid bidding documents.
Chapter IV detailed evaluation of bidding documents
Article 24 of the detailed evaluation of bidding documents generally include construction program evaluation, evaluation of the integrity of the bidders, bidding price evaluation. Bid evaluation committee shall be in accordance with the detailed evaluation rules set forth in the bidding documents in order to carry out the evaluation.
Article 25 of the bidder should be based on the bidding engineering and technical complexity or difficulty of construction organization in the bidding documents set out the detailed evaluation of the construction program and evaluation method. Among them:
(a) the construction program is not evaluated, its construction program shall be an integral part of the bidding documents;
(b) the use of qualification system evaluation, if the conclusion of its evaluation is unqualified, its bidding documents for the abolition of the bid;
(c) the use of quantitative evaluation, by the evaluation committee of the construction of its construction program to carry out an independent evaluation and quantitative scoring, and the value of the score into the detailed evaluation of bidding documents. The score will be included in the detailed evaluation score of the bidding document.
Article 26 of the bidder's integrity evaluation generally includes the evaluation of corporate integrity, the proposed project management personnel integrity evaluation of two parts, the bidder shall be reasonable in the bidding documents to set the corporate credit rating requirements or quantitative evaluation rules. Among them:
(1) If the enterprise credit rating requirement is set, the number of potential bidders must meet the relevant requirements;
(2) If quantitative evaluation is adopted, the score of the enterprise integrity evaluation shall be evaluated on the basis of the credit score of the enterprise disclosed by the competent department of construction administration of the city at the time of the deadline for bidding, and the integrity evaluation of the proposed project managers shall be evaluated on the basis of the credit information evaluation of the practitioners disclosed by the competent department of construction administration of the city at the time of the deadline for bidding. The integrity evaluation of the proposed project management personnel shall be evaluated on the basis of the credit evaluation information of the practitioners disclosed by the competent department of construction of the city at the time of the deadline for bidding or the evaluation criteria specified in the bidding documents.
Article 27 of the detailed evaluation of the bidding price with evaluation parameters, the bidder shall specify in the bidding documents the evaluation parameters of the value range and determine the way, but shall not be set unreasonable evaluation parameters maliciously low or high construction cost. The bidder may choose one of the following ways to determine the evaluation parameters, and shall set out in the bidding documents:
(i) the bidder to provide the price level of different alternatives (not less than 3 groups), in the bid opening site to randomly select a group of announced as the evaluation parameters;
(ii) the bidder from the bidding documents set up in the evaluation parameters to select one of the evaluation parameters only to determine the range of its extraction (b) The bidder selects one of the evaluation parameters from the evaluation parameters set in the bidding documents to determine only its extraction range, and determines the value of the rest of the evaluation parameters, and announces it on the spot after delivering it to the bid opening site in a sealed envelope, and determines the value of it by randomly selecting it from the range of the evaluation parameters announced on the spot.
Article 28 in accordance with the provisions of this method, the bid evaluation committee determined to be an unreasonable offer of the list of items (including technical measures and other items in the list of items), according to the combined price of the list of items accounted for the weight of the total bid price quantitative deduction points. The bidder may choose one of the following ways to deal with, but shall be set out in the bidding documents:
(a) the deduction points are included in the detailed evaluation of the bidding documents scores;
(b) the cumulative deduction points exceeding a certain range of range, its bidding documents for the abolition of the bidding process.
Article 29 of the total bid evaluation shall be based on the lowest bid in the effective competitive bidding price evaluation. Effective competitive offer based on the announced bidding control price, effective bidding price and evaluation parameters, according to the methods set out in the bidding documents to determine.
Article 30 When the construction program evaluation, bidder integrity evaluation, bidding price evaluation using quantitative evaluation, the bidder shall set out in the bidding documents in detail the evaluation of the contents of the points and calculation methods. Among them:
(a) construction program evaluation of the weight of the points should be controlled in the bidding documents evaluation of the total score of 5% to 15%;
(b) the bidder integrity evaluation of the weight of the points is generally not more than 5% of the total score of the bidding documents evaluation of the evaluation of the details.
Chapter V Recommendation of the winning candidate
Article 31 after the completion of the detailed evaluation of the bid evaluation committee, shall be submitted to the bidder a written report on the evaluation of the tender (including a written report on the clearing of the tender), stating the evaluation of the bid evaluation committee on the evaluation of the tender documents and the comparison of the views.
Article 32 of the bid evaluation committee shall, in accordance with the bidding documents stipulated in the bid evaluation method, according to the evaluation results of the ranking, recommend the top one to three bidders as the successful candidate.
Article 33 After the bid evaluation committee rejects the unqualified bids or defines them as rejected in accordance with the provisions, the bid evaluation committee may reject all of the bids if the bids are obviously uncompetitive due to the fact that there are less than three valid bids. If all the bids are rejected, the bidder shall re-tender in accordance with the law.
If the tender fails because the Bid Evaluation Committee rejects all the bids, the bidder shall not compensate the bidders for their bidding costs.
Chapter VI Fixing the Bid
Article 34 If the operation, technology, financial status, performance ability and credit of the winning candidate change significantly or if there is any violation of law, and the bidder believes that it may affect its performance ability, it shall examine and confirm it in accordance with the standards and methods stipulated in the bidding documents prior to the issuance of the notification of the award of the bid.
Article 35 The bidder may, after reporting to the relevant administrative department for the record, cancel the qualification of its successful candidate in accordance with the law if it finds one of the following circumstances in the process of examination and confirmation:
(1) there is falsification in order to win the bid;
(2) the qualification documents provided do not correspond to the actual situation;
(3) the identity of the bid participants and members of the project department identity verified as non-bidding unit personnel;
(iv) construction capacity can not meet the needs of the project or fulfill the bidding commitment.
Article 36 The bidder shall determine the successful bidder on the basis of the written bid evaluation report submitted by the bid evaluation committee, the recommended winning candidates and the examination and confirmation. The bidder shall submit a written report on the construction bidding and tendering to the municipal housing and urban-rural construction administrative department within 15 days after the determination of the winning bidder.
Article 37 of the municipal housing and urban-rural construction administrative department receives the written report, in the public notice period of the winning bidder has not notified the bidder in the bidding and tendering activities in violation of the law, the bidder may be in the winning bidder after the expiration of the public notice period of the winning bidder issued a notice of the winning bidder, and at the same time will be the winning results of the notice of all unsuccessful bidders. The notice of award will become an integral part of the construction contract.
Chapter VII Supplementary Provisions
Article 38 The bidding and evaluation activities of construction projects in urban areas of counties (including Yiling District) may refer to the implementation of these measures.
Article 39 of these measures shall come into force on the date of publication.
More about the engineering/service/procurement category of the tender writing production, enhance the winning rate, you can click on the bottom of the official website customer service free consultation:/#/?source=bdzd