Legal analysis
If the flow rate is much lower than the minimum flow rate to ensure accuracy, it will lead to no output (such as vortex flowmeter) or the output signal is cut off as a small signal (such as differential pressure flowmeter), which is unfavorable to the supply side, and there is a loss of justice. In order to prevent the loss of benefits, for a specific set of thermal energy measurement equipment, supply and demand sides are often based on the range of flow measurement and the range of degrees that can be achieved, agreed that a first-class value for the "agreement on the lower limit of the flow", and agreed that if the actual flow rate is less than the agreed value, in accordance with the lower limit of the charge flow rate charges. Measurement of the people's government above the county level administrative departments can set up measurement and verification institutions, or authorized other units of measurement and verification institutions, the implementation of mandatory verification and other verification, testing tasks. The implementation of the preceding paragraph of the calibration, testing tasks of the personnel, must be qualified by the examination. This function is usually realized in the flow display meter. Measurement of the local people's government at or above the county level in accordance with the needs of the region, the establishment of social common measurement standard instruments, by the higher people's government measurement of the administrative department to preside over the assessment and qualified for use. Enterprises, institutions according to the needs of the establishment of the unit can be used in the measurement of standard instruments, the highest measurement of its various standard instruments by the relevant people's government measurement of the administrative department to preside over the assessment of qualified for use. Metrological verification should be in accordance with the principle of economic rationalization, local and nearby. Measurement verification must be carried out in accordance with the national measurement and verification system table. National metrological verification system formulated by the State Council metrological administrative department.
Legal basis
"Government Procurement of Goods and Services Bidding Management Measures" Article 55 Comprehensive scoring method, refers to the bidding documents to meet all the substantive requirements of the bidding documents, and in accordance with the quantitative indicators of the evaluation factors of the assessment of the highest score of the bidders for the winning candidate bid evaluation method. The evaluation factors shall be set in relation to the quality of the goods and services provided by the bidder, including the bidding price, the technical or service level, the fulfillment ability, and after-sale service. Qualification conditions shall not be used as evaluation factors. The evaluation factors shall be stipulated in the bidding documents. The evaluation factors shall be refined and quantified, and correspond to the corresponding commercial conditions and procurement requirements. If there are intervals for the indicators of business conditions and procurement requirements, the evaluation factors shall be quantified to the corresponding intervals, and different scores corresponding to each interval shall be set. When evaluating the bids, each member of the bid evaluation committee shall independently evaluate the bidding documents of each bidder and summarize the score of each bidder. The price score of goods items shall not account for less than 30% of the total score; the price score of service items shall not account for less than 10% of the total score. The price of items implementing national uniform pricing standards and using fixed price procurement shall not be included as a factor in the evaluation. The price score shall be calculated using the low price priority method, i.e. the bidding price that meets the requirements of the bidding documents and has the lowest bidding price shall be the benchmark price for bid evaluation, and its price score shall be full marks. The price score of other bidders shall be calculated uniformly in accordance with the following formula: Bidding price score = (bid evaluation base price / bidding price) × 100 Total bid evaluation score = F1 × A1 + F2 × A2 + ? +Fn×AnF1, F2?Fn are the scores of the evaluation factors; A1, A2,?An are the weights of the evaluation factors (A1+A2+?). +An=1). In the bid evaluation process, the highest and lowest quotes in the offer shall not be removed. Price adjustment due to the implementation of government procurement policy, the adjusted price to calculate the evaluation of the base price and bidding price.