Odd News! Woman who left gauze inside her body after giving birth to a baby was rejected when she approached the hospital for a statement! Shouldn't the hospital be held responsible?

The hospital should be held responsible.

Women after giving birth to a child gauze was left in the body, resulting in surgery after the body can not recover, there are a lot of problems, the body continues to have a low fever and then go to other hospitals to check the time, found that there is residual gauze in the body, the residual gauze through the operation after the gauze out. The woman took the relevant medical certificates, go to the original birth hospital to claim, but was rejected by the hospital after repeated consultations to no avail after the family sent the incident to the Internet, and was recognized by the hospital as medical malpractice. The company's newest product is a new, more sophisticated, and more affordable version of its original product, which is now available for sale on the Internet.

The hospital to the woman to do surgery, the gauze residue in the woman's body, itself belongs to the beverage accident, the woman's body has caused serious damage, resulting in the woman in the birth of a child after the body repeated fever, can not get normal recuperation, and the body can not be successfully recovered after childbirth, has caused extremely serious consequences, in the woman went to other hospitals, after the discovery of the body residue The gauze retained evidence of the hospital to have a positive attitude when going to the hospital to negotiate.

Women in the hospital to give birth to a child, by the doctor to the gauze residue in the body, belonging to the hospital's responsibility is a kind of medical malpractice, must let the hospital to give a clear statement, and the hospital should bear full responsibility for this, to give the woman appropriate compensation. But the woman repeatedly hospital for consultation, always be told to wait to wait, but has not been an effective treatment program, the woman had no choice but to send video rights.

The hospital saw the video they sent after the woman sent a medical dispute related to the law informed letter that he wanted 200,000 compensation has no legal basis, is a medical behavior.