Why is the little-known job fair popular in colleges and universities?

Recently, an article entitled "Recruitment of Doctor of Linguistics in xingyi normal university for nationalities" easily broke through "65438+ million+"and was widely circulated in the circle of friends. There are some statements in the announcement: "First of all, frankly speaking, the school is average", not double-class, the platform is average, the traffic situation is not "high-speed" for the time being, and the talent introduction policy is average ...

Although these statements are not official, and some of the "conditions" have not been officially recognized by the school, their popularity itself does illustrate some problems. Generally speaking, colleges and enterprises often unconsciously "gild" themselves in recruitment announcements and try their best to cut off the bad side. This job advertisement, on the other hand, explains in detail the "very ordinary" financial situation of the school. This frankness is not arrogance, but makes people see the frankness of "saying ugly things first".

However, apart from plain writing, the key to the popularity of this article is probably the recruitment conditions listed in it, which have poked the pain points of many college professionals and made them gain long-lost recognition and respect for their self-worth, especially some college teachers think they have a kind heart. For example, it is easy to evaluate the title, and there is a "green talent channel" to evaluate the title of associate professor; What is more attractive is: there is little work pressure, no scientific research requirements, whether to apply for a project, whether to send an article or not, depending on your mind, and the school is not mandatory; You just want to have a good class, so go to class and be a good teacher. ...

Perhaps in the eyes of ordinary people, university teachers are also teachers. Isn't it enough for teachers to "give good lessons" and "be good teachers"? However, if it is put into the realistic promotion standard of college teachers, it is really too difficult for a teacher to really concentrate on good classes and be able to do scientific research and apply for projects. Especially at the moment when many colleges and universities are striving to improve their "achievements", the number of scientific research of school teachers has become a universal pursuit and even pressure.

Someone on the internet asked: I have finally passed the doctoral stage, but I really don't want to do scientific research ... I just want to teach this course well ... I don't know if it is feasible to be a lifelong lecturer. This "dream" is estimated to be a "green pepper" in many colleges and universities. However, a seemingly ridiculous answer reveals the seriousness of this "dream": low salary means that you can't get promoted, that is, you watch your colleagues get promoted, and the salary is high, but there is no reimbursement for project funds. ...

The above answer may be exaggerated, but it is generally true. At present, the evaluation right of university teachers' professional titles has been delegated to universities, and the Ministry of Education also requires different types and levels of teachers to formulate classification evaluation standards according to different disciplines and research types. However, in the selection requirements of associate professors and professors in various provinces and cities, papers and scientific research are hard thresholds.

From this perspective, the requirements of this job advertisement can be regarded as "heterogeneous". It must be admitted that marginal universities like xingyi normal university for nationalities can't be compared with universities in 985, 2 1 1 in academic atmosphere, requirements and even school orientation. Compared with the first-and second-tier cities in the west and the third-and fourth-tier cities, the cost of living is lower, and at least more teachers have the confidence to be good teachers.

However, a healthy and reasonable teacher evaluation system should not make all teachers work hard for papers and scientific research. Teachers who are keen on scientific research are promising. Those who are determined to be "good teachers" can also live a decent life and be awarded professional titles. This is the real respect for talents.

In reality, this "most honest recruitment" standard may not be universal, but it does make people see the "back to basics" side of colleges and universities, and see the qualities that many more powerful colleges and universities do not necessarily have. The more places where talents are scarce, the more people can see the scientific attitude towards talents. This is also a clear stream in the current higher education sector.