Penalty decision of safety supervision bureau

In order to give full play to the important role of the safety monitoring system, the safety supervision bureau will issue a penalty decision to organizations or individuals who fail to perform their safety production management responsibilities according to law. Below I will share with you some punishment decisions of the Safety Supervision Bureau for your reference.

Fan Safety Supervision Bureau Punishment Decision

Wang Yuan:

After investigation, as the main person in charge of Qingdao Yihe Business Hotel Co., Ltd., you failed to fulfill the responsibility of safety production management according to law and filed a complaint with Qingdao Yihe Business Hotel Co., Ltd., Shinan District, Qingdao? 5. 19? Being responsible for a large liquefied gas explosion accident violates the provisions of paragraph 5 of Article 18 of the Law on Safety in Production in People's Republic of China (PRC). According to the provisions of paragraph 2 of Article 92 of the Law on Safety in Production in People's Republic of China (PRC), our bureau will impose an administrative penalty of RMB one hundred and forty-four thousand nine hundred and twenty yuan only. As the administrative penalty decision [20XX]Z 10 1-2 of Qing 'an Supervision and Punishment cannot be delivered directly, by lien or by mail, it is hereby announced to you in accordance with the law. You are limited to receive the "Decision on Administrative Punishment" from our bureau within 60 days from the date of announcement. If it is overdue, it shall be deemed to have been delivered.

If you refuse to accept this punishment decision, you may apply for administrative reconsideration to Qingdao Municipal People's Government within 60 days, or bring an administrative lawsuit to Shinan District People's Court within 6 months. If it fails to apply for administrative reconsideration or bring an administrative lawsuit within the time limit and fails to perform it, the organ shall apply to the people's court for compulsory execution according to law.

Address: No.71Hong Kong Middle Road, Shinan District, Tel: 859 1606 1.

Qingdao administration of work safety

20XX May 9th

Fan Safety Supervision Bureau Punishment Decision

The Company and all members of the Board of Directors guarantee that the contents of the announcement are true, accurate and complete, without any false records, misleading statements or major omissions, and bear individual and joint legal responsibilities for the truthfulness, accuracy and completeness of the contents.

I. Punishment

Nantong Henghua Adhesive Material Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as? Henghua company? ) 20XX received from Rudong County Administration of Work Safety (hereinafter referred to as? Safety supervision bureau? The administrative penalty decision (Dong 'an Jian Penalty Zi [20XX]No. (6028)) mainly contains the following contents:

Nantong Henghua Adhesive Materials Technology Co., Ltd. learned from Nantong Center for Disease Control and Prevention on July 20XX 10 that the assistant worker week of Henghua Company was diagnosed as an occupational chronic mild toxic liver disease caused by dimethylformamide, and the safety supervision bureau investigated the situation.

The working environment of PUR workshop of Henghua Company does not meet the occupational health standards and requirements; Dimethylformamide (pumping, cleaning, cleaning and discharging posts) in workers' workplaces exceeds the standard, and the occupational health operation procedures are not perfect; Failing to organize workers to receive occupational health training before taking up their posts; Failing to take corresponding measures to strengthen the management of occupational disease prevention and control, so as to ensure that workers can obtain occupational health protection; Zhou's occupational chronic mild toxic liver disease is caused by long-term exposure to dimethylformamide.

The above facts violate the second paragraph of Article 4 of the Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) on the Prevention and Control of Occupational Diseases; Article 2 1 Paragraph 3, Item 4: Article 35, Paragraph 2: Article 36, Paragraph 1. According to Article 78 of the Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) on the Prevention and Control of Occupational Diseases, the following administrative penalties are given:

1. Ordered to stop the operation that caused occupational hazards, and imposed an administrative penalty of100000 yuan.

Second, the handling of punishment matters

The management of the company attached great importance to this incident, and the general manager presided over an emergency meeting, issued an announcement throughout the company, and carried out the following handling work:

1, establish and improve the occupational health management system and operating procedures; Establish and improve occupational health files and workers' health monitoring files;

2. Conduct occupational health training for workers before taking up their posts and regular occupational health training during their posts, so as to popularize occupational health knowledge;

3. Ordering the personnel department and the production department to organize the workers engaged in the operations with occupational hazards to carry out the occupational health examination before, during and after taking up their posts, and inform the workers of the examination results in writing;

4. Change the production process and replace dimethylformamide with dimethylacetamide;

5. Summarize the lessons of this incident, formulate preventive measures and train relevant personnel.

Third, the impact of punishment on the company.

1. Henghua Company has paid a fine of RMB 654.38 million in full in September of 20XX, accounting for a small proportion of the annual operating income of 20XX, and will not have a significant impact on the company's production and operation.

This incident has no significant impact on the production and operation of the company's products, and the company will strengthen occupational health and hygiene management in the future.

Board of Directors of Wuxi Wan Li Adhesive Material Co., Ltd.

20XX. 1. 18

Fan Wensan, Punishment Decision of Safety Supervision Bureau

Parties: 73 1 Dali Xisheng Cotton Spinning Co., Ltd. and other enterprises (the list is attached).

It was found that Dali Xisheng Cotton Spinning Co., Ltd. and other 192 enterprises stopped working for more than half a year after opening; 24 non-corporate enterprises, such as the spice experimental factory of Shaanxi Agricultural Reclamation Research Center, stopped their business activities 1 year and failed to cancel their registration as required; 49 sole proprietorship enterprises such as Guo Xinghua Factory in Dali County have been closed for more than half a year; 466 enterprises in Dali County, such as Yinguan Refrigerator, failed to apply for tax registration. At the request of the tax authorities, the administrative department for industry and commerce revoked their business licenses. Dali County State Taxation Bureau issued the materials for revoking the business license.

The main evidence of the above facts is as follows:

1, 20XX March 16, Dali County Market Supervision Administration issued a notice on the website of Dali County People's Government, proving that our bureau informed the parties of the consequences and time limit of the illegal act;

2. The revocation materials issued by Dali County State Taxation Bureau prove the illegal facts of the parties.

On April 25th, 20XX, our bureau filed a case for investigation.