It is estimated that LZ is studying law, so these two rights belong to the category of human rights only from the legal point of view. It is impossible to strictly demonstrate which is more important, but legally speaking, the right to life and health is more important.
1. "Give me liberty or give me death" was said by a poet or scholar (sorry, I don't know who said it). Just my personal opinion. Although many people agree, there is no legal and legal basis.
2. Important legal basis of the right to life and health
(1)LZ also said the provisions of the criminal law. The criminal law of all countries thinks that the most cruel criminal law is the death penalty, that is, the law thinks that the right to life and health is more important.
(2) According to the written statements in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, we can find that among the three most basic human rights, the right to life comes before the right to freedom and personal security. Although it cannot be said that the former is more important than the latter, it can be seen that legislators attach more importance to the former.
(3) The right to life is the foundation of all human rights. An accepted proposition, if you don't participate in the debate. . . It can be considered that the foundation is more important. Because without A, there is no B, and with A and without B, of course A is important. This is also the consistent attitude of our government towards human rights: "The right to subsistence is the foundation of all human rights" (I won't comment on this, just calm down).
3. What your teacher said
That's from the perspective of execution. Besides, the word "in a sense" is specially used to make some amazing remarks and ensure that the proposition is completely correct. You can basically ignore what the teacher says at present. You'll understand after studying for a long time. . . .