Aging, not a large proportion of the old population is aging. The main manifestations of aging are: lack of labor force, insufficient soldiers. The financial performance is difficult to provide support.
The proportion of elderly people is large, for countries with small populations, this aspect is obvious. For example, Japan, a large number of elderly people, the labor force is obviously insufficient, a shortage of soldiers. However, Japan has no difficulty in providing for the elderly. China is a large country with a population of 1.4 billion, and there is no such thing as a shortage of labor or soldiers at any time. As for the difficulty of supporting the elderly, it can be solved by adjusting the distribution system. For example, the principle of distribution in the form of a comb-back is practiced, whereby young people who have just started work are paid lower wages, middle-aged people are paid higher wages, and older people are paid lower wages. This is the principle of distribution that many countries follow.
China, if it implements a retirement system at the age of 65, will not have an aging problem at all.
Is aging serious in China? Some experts analyze that China has entered an aging society and the problem is serious. I don't think so, China's response is not a problem at all if it is done properly.
China is a large country with a large population, calculated at the age of 60 as the elderly population, the elderly population accounts for a larger proportion of the population indeed. What if we calculate at 65 years old? What about calculating at 70 years old? Is such a proportion of the elderly population still large?
The experts' proposal to extend the retirement age to 65 is also a response to the problems posed by an aging society, and the initial intention is right. But it was strongly opposed, especially by laid-off workers who are hard to employ, because these people have no or very little income, and they have to pay social security for their difficult lives. Extending the retirement period means pushing back the time for receiving pension and extending the time for paying social security, so how can they not oppose it? If we think about it from another angle, that is, since there is a shortage of labor, why not create labor opportunities for these people? Are you afraid of postponing retirement if you have money to earn?
Today's society, many people aged 60 to 70 years old are capable of labor, as long as the adjustment is appropriate, the arrangement of joint efforts, those who dance in the square will not have to vent their energy on the square dance.