How to evaluate the movie Spider-Man: The Return of Heroes?

I think everyone is already very familiar with Spider-Man. Toby Vincent Maguire's Spider-Man trilogy impressed the audience with the classics of this series; Garfield's Spider-Man impressed the audience with his handsome face.

So when the new Spider-Man comes out, how should we evaluate the movie Spider-Man: The Return of Heroes?

As we all know, this is the first solo film after Spider returned to the Marvel Universe, which was jointly produced by Marvel Pictures and Sony Colombia. The film is full of surprises. It not only finds a father like Iron Man to help out, but also restores the true image of Spider-Man almost perfectly.

As we know, before this movie, there were two versions of Spider-Man-Spider-Man by Toby Vincent Maguire and Spider-Man by Andrew Garfield. Each of the two Spider-Man has its own advantages, and of course, each has its own shortcomings.

Of course, I'm not denying their acting skills, but the image they created was when Spider-Man just started out, which is far from the image in the comics. You know, when Spider-Man was born, he was just a high school student.

So we also saw the Tom Holland version of Spider-Man, which is closer to the cartoon image. It is said that he himself broke the Guinness World Record and became the youngest superhero actor.

Maybe this movie is not as classic as the first generation, but it is wonderful enough. It not only satisfies the desire of fans, but also makes those generations of movie powder express well. Of course, if you just insist that the first generation is the best, I have nothing to say after all. The effect produced by the first generation under the technology at that time is really good, but I don't think it is quite in line with the image of Spider-Man in my mind, so I regard the first generation film as an imperfect excellent work.