In marriage, two people's happiness needs two people to manage with care. Perhaps the husband seems a little timid in life, but marriage needs two people's compromises and concessions, and there is no causal relationship between them.
Every couple has their own way of getting along, as long as both sides can accept it. I have been married to my lover for several years, and I have never been timid in my life. Only when two people get along, will I take the initiative to do many things, safeguard our feelings and strive to make life happier.
On the issue of family division, I am responsible for making money to support my family, and she is responsible for making money and saving money. I think this way of getting along is good. Every couple in life has different ways of getting along, and there is no difference, as long as both sides feel happy.
I don't think this sentence makes sense. A happy marriage needs no injustice, and a husband can be happy without cowardice. That's my own marital status. I haven't felt timid in recent years, but I still feel very happy in real life. The two of us are still working together to create our own bright future.
In fact, in life, compromise and concession between husband and wife are inevitable. But this compromise is based on mutual recognition and has nothing to do with whether the husband is timid or not.
If a happy marriage needs to be based on the cowardice of the husband, then this marriage is not happy at all. Because a man who suppresses his emotions in his life all the year round cannot be happy at all.
Only one person in marriage is happy, so this happiness is only an illusion.
We always expect our marriage to embrace happiness, but if you always impose all your efforts in marriage on your husband, then this marriage is more likely to be sad.
A happy marriage needs no one to be afraid, only two people to run it together.