1, proficient in the basic theory and professional knowledge of this major, master the development trend of this major at home and abroad, and be able to determine the work and scientific research direction of this major according to the needs of national and professional development.
2, outstanding work performance, with rich clinical or technical work experience, can solve complex and difficult major technical problems or have a high level of scientific monographs, papers or experience summary. Proficient in reading professional books and periodicals in a foreign language.
3. As an academic and technical leader of this major, he is good at guiding and organizing the overall business and technical work of this major, and has the ability to train specialized personnel.
4, engaged in the deputy director of medicine (medicine, nursing, technology) division for more than five years.
Professional title evaluation process:
1. application review: the applicant shall meet the requirements of application conditions and submit application materials as required.
2. Review group or expert review: put forward opinions to the applicant as a reference for voting at the review meeting.
3. Review: The review committee organizes review meetings and votes on the principle that the minority is subordinate to the majority.
4. Publicity of evaluation results: The unit that set up the title evaluation committee shall publicize the evaluation results for not less than 5 working days and accept social supervision.
5. Confirmation of evaluation results: those who pass the evaluation after publicity without objection shall be confirmed by the administrative department of human resources and social security or the unit composed of the title evaluation committee.